Podcast on Prostitution
This is a discussion on Podcast on Prostitution within the Chit chat (MAIN) anti misandry forums, part of the Introduction to anti misandry category; [ Prostitution: The Liberated Woman Is A Whore ] All files are in MP3 format. Each show is approximately 30 ...
- 29th-July-2009 #1
Podcast on Prostitution
[ Prostitution: The Liberated Woman Is A Whore ]
All files are in MP3 format. Each show is approximately 30 minutes long. A text version of the programme is available here.
This is a podcast on prostitution by John Young which gives a whole new meaning to the phrase "all women are whores".
He reveals that in a specific built-up urban area, that 2% of White women aged 20 to 40 were working as prostitutes, and that 6% of White women worked in prostitution at some stage or other by by age 40. These are conservative estimates. Yes, my friends, whoredom is the natural state of woman.
The narrator makes the crucial difference between WHISPER prostitutes and COYOTE prostitutes. These acronyms come from two organisations Women Hurt In Systems of Prostitution, and Call Off Your Old Tired Ethics; who each represent two fundamentally different groups of prostitutes and have different objectives.
WHISPER prostitution consists of women forcibly trafficked and under the ownership of pimps. COYOTE prostitutes, on the other hand, are women working "independently" and of their own volition. Feminists do not make this distinction because they want to pretend all women in prostitution are victims, they want to shroud the industry up in mystery and lies. They want to control the terms of debate.
Feminsts detract all the time from the fact that many women freely enter prostitution, and enjoy the work. Women enter prostitution commonly because it is a part of their spirit, and because sex is meaningless to them. This is the reality that feminists eternally want to deny.
Feminists do excellent work for prostitution by covering it up in a maze of lies, confusing it to no end. What remains constant, however, is that women working in prostitution are always held as innocent, and must in no circumstance be subject to legal restrictions. You could say in a way feminism is the PR mouthpiece, or trade union, for prostitution.
John identifies COYOTE prostitutes typically as young, beautiful, educated women in secure respectable jobs. He says all of them named feminism as their primary influence in entering and remaining in the profession - that it allowed a subversion of Patriarchy and moral codes. One said, "prostitution is liberation for women".
Indeed, this is a statement echoed by countless Internet prostitutes (aka porn stars), including Sasha Grey.
Of the three COYOTEs he interviewed, three grew up without their biological father. However, I believe he puts undue emphasis on this fact and that further investigation would illustrate that biofather presence has in fact little to do with middle-class, educated women entering prostitution.
Podcasts such as this lay out the true relationship between feminists, prostitution and the nature of woman. Podcasts such as this should reveal to you perfectly why I blow charletan frauds like Schopenbecq of TheAntifeminst.com right out of the water. They are talking nothing but nonsense.
Schopenbecq wants us to cheer with feminists and prostitutes themselves in the elevation of prostitution to an acceptable norm, an acceptable "life choice for women". He wants us to fight for the rights of "sex workers" from feminists who want to "restrict the sexual free market". Bull-fucking-shit. He's a liar and a fraud and this audio illustrates that perfectly.
This podcast reaffirms what I have always instinctively known about women and feminists:
1. That whoredom is an essential, natural part of the female psyche, and most women, if given the choice, will enter the profession of prostitution frivilously.
2. That feminism is responsible, more than anything else, for the saturation of pornography and prostitution in our culture, and their elevation to "acceptable career choices".
3. That feminism can accurately be described as the "movement of whores" as much as it can be the "movement of women". Perhaps indeed, there is no "women's movement" without a "whore's movement", and vice versa.
The narrator explores prostitution also from the point of view of the threat it poses to White communities and families. It is up to yourself whether you want to sympathise with this particular point of view. I believe his assessment is correct - that prostitution does indeed contribute to the breakdown of the White families - as it does also to Black, Asian, Muslim families, etc.
This is a well produced, well researched audio that is well worth your time. It illustrates the way things are at the moment, and the way things will continue to go, with feminism being the primary driver and cause of ongoing trends.
The hypersex culture, mass porn, and ubiquitous prostitution, will not end until a stake is delivered into the heart of feminism. Indeed, none of those issues can be understood properly outside of the context of the sexual anarchism of feminism.
The audio will challenge your beliefs on the nature of woman. On feminism, it will either reconfirm your views on it, or force you to revise them. Either way it should reinvigorate your indignation against Feminism and the Matriarchy Movement.
[ MRN Blog ]
Last edited by Male-Rights-Network; 29th-July-2009 at 01:45 AM.
- 29th-July-2009 # ADS
Advertisement Circuit advertisement- Member Since
- Always
- Posts
- Many
-
Re: Podcast on Prostitution
Quote: "Yes, my friends, whoredom is the natural state of woman."
And, "That whoredom is an essential, natural part of the female psyche, and most women, if given the choice, will enter the profession of prostitution frivilously."
Even if the claim that 2 to 6% of women are prostitutes is actually accurate (which is debatable), that hardly sustains the notion that prostitution is a 'natural part of the female psyche.'
What a bunch of ********.
"Civilization can only revive when there shall come into being in a number of individuals a new tone of mind, independent of the prevalent one among the crowds, and in opposition to it- a tone of mind which will gradually win influence over the collective one, and in the end determine its character. Only an ethical movement can rescue us from barbarism, and the ethical comes into existence only in individuals."
"Until he extends his circle of compassion to include all living things, man will not himself find peace."-Albert Schweitzer
- 29th-July-2009 #3
Re: Podcast on Prostitution
Yes, and men are rapists, naturally, right? It's in their psyche. Reverse the gender is hilarious sometimes. lol.
- 29th-July-2009 #4
Re: Podcast on Prostitution
Prostitution has been here around for ages!
There were even people stupid enough to call prostitution sacred!
When you really think about it a whore is a sub-woman!
- 29th-July-2009 #5
Re: Podcast on Prostitution
In some form or other yes.Prostitution has been here around for ages!
But I would say the fundamental differences in the Matriarchal/Feminist Age are Accessibility and Acceptability.
Porn and prostitution are ubiquitous in the Feminist age.
Working in the prostitute industry as a woman is deemed an entirely legal, moral and acceptable choice by society. This was not always the case.
- 29th-July-2009 #6
-
Re: Podcast on Prostitution
Honest Prostitutes are better than dishonest wives!
- 29th-July-2009 #8
- 29th-July-2009 #9
- 29th-July-2009 #10
Re: Podcast on Prostitution
The only reason women had "respect and dignity" in the past is because men demanded it.
There were restrictions on female licence - stigmas, criminalisation, etc. Once these were removed there was only one end. Respect and dignity are not things that come naturally to woman. Whoredom is.
What you see today in the West is woman behaving more or less in her natural state.Last edited by Male-Rights-Network; 29th-July-2009 at 03:19 AM.
-
- 29th-July-2009 #12
Re: Podcast on Prostitution
I don't understand MRAs who defend women's "right to whore".
-
Re: Podcast on Prostitution
Used to be easy in the old days..
There were "nice girls" and there were "dirty women"..
A man wants to marry a nice girl, but he still wants a dirty one now and then..
Such is nature!
Now, we have a lot of dirty women, and they think they are "nice"!
What is a man to do under such circumstances?
-
- 29th-July-2009 #15
You may also enjoy reading the following threads, why not give them a try?
-
Podcast masculiniste
By frostyboy in forum Campaigns & NewsReplies: 1Last Post: 3rd-September-2008, 07:20 PM




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks









Reply With Quote








Bookmarks