Open Question: Will a feminist-driven society survive?

Marx · #1 25th-August-2008

From Yahoo Answers

Quote:

why did the male rather than the female always have precedence? The answer is that the female is weak and pathetic in comparison to the male - and this was especially so in more primitive times and places where muscles were almost as important as brains. She also has the children to bear and to look after. Further, females will have spent much of their youth preparing for motherhood and all its ramifications. In other words, females had enough on their plates. And what hope would there have been for any social groupings that gave the most power to those members least capable of using it effectively? Well, they would have been rapidly outgunned by those that didn't do this. And so they would have quickly disappeared. And so it is that, on balance, both the men and the women benefited from the custom that gave the male control of the family's wealth and power. Indeed, even today, those groups that are still very much attached to 'the family' (such as found in many UK Asian communities) and the traditional roles contained therein, are doing exceedingly well in comparison to those where the 'family' is more loosely structured and where the men have, effectively, been disempowered. These latter groups (e.g. as found in many council estates) are failures, and they would disintegrate completely were it not for the fact that they are kept alive by tax burdens placed upon the rest of us. In conclusion, it seems that if in any social groups from the past had handed more power to their women and less to their men, they would, quite simply, have rapidly disappeared. And, indeed, this is exactly what seems to be happening now. Feminist-dominated societies and cultures will soon be washed away and completely over-run by those wherein women prefer to stay at home and have children. Very simple mathematics will demonstrate this. And given that white western women currently make up only some 5% of the Earth's population then, in 100 years time, they will barely exist at all. Feminism is an ideology that promotes self-extinction. It is a cultural and racial suicide pill. It has no hope of succeeding. It has no hope of surviving.

Garak · #2 25th-August-2008

Quote:

And yet, countries with women-friendly policies, have higher birthrates than those without, such as Italy and Germany. So I think the question is, will countries which don't accept feminism survive? :-)

My response on Yahoo:

I think you need to get your facts straight.

On a comparison chart of 221 countries, Italy (8.36 per 1000 pop) is 217 and Germany (8.18 per 1000 pop) is 219. In first place is Niger with a birthrate of 49.62 per 1000 population. Quite a difference eh?

In other words, you are incorrect. You wanna rethink your position?

Source:

http://www.indexmundi.com/g/r.aspx?v=25

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Open Question: How can a woman not be a feminist?	RSSreader	Chit chat (MAIN)	3	2nd-October-2008 07:36 AM
Open Question: Do you consider yourself a feminist? Which gender are you? What does t	RSSreader	Chit chat (MAIN)	1	28th-August-2008 12:43 PM
Open Question: Does Literacy Affect Equality in Modern Society?	RSSreader	Chit chat (MAIN)	3	28th-August-2008 10:21 AM
Open Question: Can I be a feminist if I disagree with the majority of feminist litera	Marx	Chit chat (MAIN)	2	25th-August-2008 12:31 PM

Open Question: Will a feminist-driven society survive?

Open Question: Will a feminist-driven society survive?

Similar Threads