one should not look for common sense from a hysterical dogma like feminitism !

feminit lexicon morphs to suit wimyn's purpose ie - freeloading at the expense of men

it is a bit like a delegation going to a gold mine and freeloading the gold but leaving their fecal deposits behind for the miners to do what they will

Because many of them have degenerated into entitlement whores who expect to be pampered for the rest of their lives.

Because women are greedy, self centered and aroagent to think that just because they have a 3 inch slit between their legs and two bags of meat hanging off their chests that they are better then men and other women.

Quote from Kargan3033

Because women are greedy, self centered and aroagent to think that just because they have a 3 inch slit between their legs and two bags of meat hanging off their chests that they are better then men and other women.

No one should be surprised that I want nothing to do with women's twin lumps of fat and ugly axewound. I don't trust women enough to believe in loving one of them.

Because they know they can pussify dumbass men into sex-servitude

Gawd, and I thought this might get some legitimate responses... instead it's just misogyny.

Women expect it because society and feminists say that they deserve to be treated like princesses. Through out history, laws have been put in place to make womens' lives easier. The best example I can think of is the chivalry the Knights would display towards females and treating them with respect. Women saw that and want to feel that, yet they want to be treated like equals. People in the media, movies and music can help fuel these ideas of entitlement.

Also, while I understand the anger in here, don't you all think you are taking your comments far?

If a feminist had said anything towards men, like you have from above, all of you would be mad and claim her to be a troll.

Fighting misandry with misogyny isn't going to help us win against them..

All of you sound like a male version of Andrea Dworkin, which is quite bad.

We must act mature and strong, not like a child

Quote from haute macabre

Also, while I understand the anger in here, don't you all think you are taking your comments far?

If a feminist had said anything towards men, like you have from above, all of you would be mad and claim her to be a troll.

Fighting misandry with misogyny isn't going to help us win against them..

All of you sound like a male version of Andrea Dworkin, which is quite bad.

We must act mature and strong, not like a child

exactly.

Isn't it a rhetorical question posed before energy is wastingly invested in highlighting the obvious as a response? The state facilitates bad behaviours by certain social groups in it's attempts to wield and solidify power. Women are no more guilty than any other group that have been manipulated historically upon high to furnish wider elitist agendas. Our true struggle is a power issue with the state, not being sidelined by engaging in unnecessary and distracting animosity generated within the sexes.

I believe equality should be applied in all cases across the board. However, women want equality when it suits them and to be treated like a woman when that suits them.

And thus the eternal struggle for men is revealed.

How do we deal with cognitively dissonant loonies on a daily basis without going crazy ourselves?

The answer was so surprisingly simple I'm amazed no one else posted it yet.

We (men) learned long ago that women as a gender are pretty much batshit insane (with exceptions, of course), and as a coping mechanism we simply ignore them.

That's it.

Think about it, how many times have you seen a woman out in public doing something no man ever would; like going at a man twice their size, driving like a blind epileptic who'd dropped a lit cigarette in his lap, or any other manner of behavior that left you scratching your head in wonder.

And how many times upon seeing that did you return to what you were doing beforehand as if nothing had happened?

That's what I thought...

Quote from Marx

Gawd, and I thought this might get some legitimate responses... instead it's just misogyny.

No kidding!

No one should be surprised that I want nothing to do with women's twin lumps of fat and ugly axewound.

Breasts are just lumps of fat and pussies are ugly?? Not where I live.

How do we deal with cognitively dissonant loonies on a daily basis without going crazy ourselves?

I don't know about 'cognitively dissonant' but they do think differently and are heavily influenced by their emotions. Knowing that in advance gives us an edge.

I agree with CD, the havoc wrought by feminism comes via the state, not individual women. If it was men who were told they could "have it all", a good many of them would be tempted.

Chivalry was invented because men were too stupidly sexist back in the days. It applies back then, but not today. The women who want special treatment want it and use this conservative standard. Who do these women think they are, deserving special treatment because they are women? By this logic, it's either we men should get special treatment as well, or women should be devoid of this special treatment and be treated the way they treat us men. I believe we should have special treatment too, or women should not get special treatment unless with a valid reason (being a woman is NOT a valid reason.
To men and women: Use logic, not tradition, to determine treatment. Girls do not deserve special treatment because they are girls. Neither do men get special treatment because they are men. Treat each other equally, and society will be better (e.g. men pay 1/2 of the date bill, and women pay the other half). I say this proudly as if speaking in a podium.

Because they are worth it..

Those delightful melons and that sweet honey pot are all it takes to impress most men..

I have no idea where those foul mouthed chappies got their language from when describing the fair sex and its main qualities and the reasons that men love them so much..

Quote from Soldier of Fortune

Who do these women think they are, deserving special treatment because they are women? By this logic, it's either we men should get special treatment as well, or women should be devoid of this special treatment and be treated the way they treat us men. I believe we should have special treatment too, or women should not get special treatment unless with a valid reason (being a woman is NOT a valid reason.

Conversely, women's special treatment is actually dependent on men being badly treated (you'll note the same prejudicial pattern repeated throughout history in virtually all social hierarchies). You can't have one without the other. They are two polar opposites of the same thing!

A more fairer and inclusive solution would be to find a practical grounding somewhere in the middle of the two extremes. But that would be too worryingly similar to what feminists fraudulently advocate, but never actually deliver upon!