Thread: Open Question: Why do MRA's say 90% of rape cases are lies?

It may not be 90% but it is surely nearer.

HOLD ON A SECOND!

I have never ever ever heard of an MRA quote of false rape stats even approaching 90%. What the hell?
Seriously, this is a tactic used by feminists all the time! They misquote even out own figures in order to distort our image! It is called projective identification! They accuse us of the very same things that they are guilty of!

Ok, brother I hear you

HOLD ON A SECOND!

I have never ever ever heard of an MRA quote of false rape stats even approaching 90%. What the hell?
Seriously, this is a tactic used by feminists all the time! They misquote even out own figures in order to distort our image! It is called projective identification! They accuse us of the very same things that they are guilty of!

I', happy others see through the reality of what's going on.

I heard a quote, when was the last time you felt good about anything?

I want that again

Angry Harry gets close. He uses a persuasive mathematical arguement that is full of untested assumptions and I am sure is invalid. But he is the only MRA I have seen claiming that high.

Even if there was only 1 false assumption and 1 rape this still would be too much. It is imho more about fairness than oppression olympics.

Quote from Whoever

This is just not true! Most rape cases (about 90% are thrown out because there is no evidence, but most of those women are telling the truth, you just cannot lock a man up on a woman's word (yet).

So, MRAs can't say that 90% of rape cases are false, but you CAN say that most are true? Ah, I'm glad we got that small matter clear.

When considering as to how many accusations may be false, I think to myself "what's more likely? That any given woman would lie about having been raped, or that any given man would rape?".

And given that I see far more male disgust towards men who rape, than I do female disgust towards false-accusers, I'd say that the former was the more likely case scenario.

I once said something similar (although not quite as explicit), and was told "you must be so misogynistic, is you think a woman would like about being raped, like that". I turn it around, and say, "you must be so MISANDRIC, if you think a man would rape a woman, like that".

False-accusers are granted anonymity by the law, and will never be dealt with anywhere near as harshly, as are rapists.

So, yeah, as far as I'm concerned, the false-accusation rate is most probably well over 50%; maybe not as high as 90%, but over 50%.

Whatever the % of false rape cases are, fact is rape is down 75% in the last 50 years.

Quote from Unregistered

Whatever the % of false rape cases are, fact is rape is down 75% in the last 50 years.

And that's a good thing indeed.

Quote from Unregistered

Whatever the % of false rape cases are, fact is rape is down 75% in the last 50 years.

or maybe advances in dna testing, cctv and the like have made it harder for women to get away with their lies.

Quote from scullion

or maybe advances in dna testing, cctv and the like have made it harder for women to get away with their lies.

And then there are these really neato digital recorders that look like a pen that record up to 12 hours of audio. Add to that the ability of smart phones to record audio and video and you get hard core evidence that can be used against a false accuser.

This is just not true! Most rape cases (about 90% are thrown out because there is no evidence, but most of those women are telling the truth, you just cannot lock a man up on a woman's word (yet).

The last word, in brackets, tells me all I need to know about the person behind the post. What a very sinister notion; some sort of twisted relishment of which, she is displaying.

Quote from byslexic_danana

The last word, in brackets, tells me all I need to know about the person behind the post. What a very sinister notion; some sort of twisted relishment of which, she is displaying.