Interesting. So despite women claiming to be more compassionate, sacrificial, selfless and nurturing it is the men who would stay and protect the women? With all those traits you would think women should not be allowed in combat because they would care too much about men.


But it is true. Men have an instinct to protect women. Women don't have an instinct to protect men.

And for that reason misandry will NEVER go away.

Yes they should be allowed to fight the front lines!

Why?
So that the whole world can see that all feminists are full of shit!!!

I have pondered this notion before

if a man has a dog and the man is attacked or his space invaded by an intruder the dog will fight for or at least bake to notify the master of the intruder

the dog clearly has a sense of loyalty for its master

however a cat won't ! ! it only is there to lap up the free milk land sardines and will let the owner stroke it as a reward

a cat has no loyalty to its master er host

a cat basically is a parasite

whoever heard of a cat fighting for or alerting the master of an intruder

it just ain't in their nature !!


cats are freeloaders and have been going back to the earliest civilisations - the Egyptians had cats

Quote from shaazam

I have pondered this notion before

if a man has a dog and the man is attacked or his space invaded by an intruder the dog will fight for or at least bake to notify the master of the intruder

the dog clearly has a sense of loyalty for its master

however a cat won't ! ! it only is there to lap up the free milk land sardines and will let the owner stroke it as a reward

a cat has no loyalty to its master er host

a cat basically is a parasite

whoever heard of a cat fighting for or alerting the master of an intruder

it just ain't in their nature !!


cats are freeloaders and have been going back to the earliest civilisations - the Egyptians had cats

To be honest the only contribution women have ever made is to have children.

From what I have read it was men who raised them in the old days.

Quote from shaazam

I have pondered this notion before

if a man has a dog and the man is attacked or his space invaded by an intruder the dog will fight for or at least bake to notify the master of the intruder

the dog clearly has a sense of loyalty for its master

however a cat won't ! ! it only is there to lap up the free milk land sardines and will let the owner stroke it as a reward

a cat has no loyalty to its master er host

a cat basically is a parasite

whoever heard of a cat fighting for or alerting the master of an intruder

it just ain't in their nature !!


cats are freeloaders and have been going back to the earliest civilisations - the Egyptians had cats

Your talking about domestic cats!!
what about the wildcats, the ones that don't hesitate to rip your throat out if you mess with them.

Quote from Zuberi

Your talking about domestic cats!!
what about the wildcats, the ones that don't hesitate to rip your throat out if you mess with them.

yes I was referring the house cat and its parasitic nature with the host to illustrate an idea about the relationship between a man and his feminit "partner"

however even the wildest of cats can be brought to heel - for a while

but their cat nature stays with them

there was a circus act in NZ where the "cat master " was killed by one of his white Asian tigers

cats are cats they never show complete loyalty to their food source

Quote from musicman.2

To be honest the only contribution women have ever made is to have children.

From what I have read it was men who raised them in the old days.

I'm not sure which days you're talking about, but may we not forget the grand old tradition of "send 'em off to boarding school" where, until 30 or 40 years ago, many more teachers would have been men than are now. Does that count as men raising your child for you?

Should women fight on the front line: No, and I wonder why so many feminists seem to be all for "the draft" (or conscription, as we call it in the UK) until someone suggests that women should be summoned to fight?

Quote from Euphemia

I'm not sure which days you're talking about, but may we not forget the grand old tradition of "send 'em off to boarding school" where, until 30 or 40 years ago, many more teachers would have been men than are now. Does that count as men raising your child for you?

Should women fight on the front line: No, and I wonder why so many feminists seem to be all for "the draft" (or conscription, as we call it in the UK) until someone suggests that women should be summoned to fight?

So female privilege it is?

Quote from musicman.2

So female privilege it is?

Of what? The privilege not to fight on the front line or to allow men to raise women's children for them?

I was reading a discussion a while ago on a UK newspaper's website about women on the front line, and one commenter (apparently male) said something like "Women are wives and families, they are the future that men fight to defend." If that's true, somehow I can't see feminists inspiring men to fight ...

Quote from Euphemia

Of what? The privilege not to fight on the front line or to allow men to raise women's children for them?

I was reading a discussion a while ago on a UK newspaper's website about women on the front line, and one commenter (apparently male) said something like "Women are wives and families, they are the future that men fight to defend." If that's true, somehow I can't see feminists inspiring men to fight ...

The first one.

Obviously only women are worth fighting for. Which is probably true since mostly everyone in the military is male. I guess most of life's burdens do fall on men.

And most of lifes benefits as well as the gains from war are given to women.

More on this can be found at www.feministcritics.org

In other news: men are expendable and women are valuable.

what's new.

Quote from musicman.2

The first one.

Obviously only women are worth fighting for. Which is probably true since mostly everyone in the military is male. I guess most of life's burdens do fall on men.

And most of lifes benefits as well as the gains from war are given to women.

More on this can be found at www.feministcritics.org

In other news: men are expendable and women are valuable.

what's new.

Women are valuable but for how long.
In my cuntry they've already given the green light for cloning! I personally don't approve of cloning but they don't care. Someday the feminist clowns and manginas will be dealt a very bad hand, when this happens, I will laugh at their calamity!!!

Quote from musicman.2

More on this can be found at www.feministcritics.org

In other news: men are expendable and women are valuable.

what's new.

Agreed. Thanks for the link.