8Likes Open Question: No more need for marriage because of Feminism?
This is a discussion on Open Question: No more need for marriage because of Feminism? within the Chit chat (MAIN) anti misandry forums, part of the Introduction to anti misandry category; Open Question: No more need for marriage because of Feminism? From Yahoo Answers Now that the feminist movement has made ...
- 12th-August-2009 #1
Open Question: No more need for marriage because of Feminism?
Open Question: No more need for marriage because of Feminism?
From Yahoo Answers
Now that the feminist movement has made it acceptable for women to sleep with whomever they want whenever they want, do you think this is responsible for dropping marriage rates? Now men can live single and get laid with tons of women without the responsibilities and costs of marriage. :)
- 12th-August-2009 # ADS
Advertisement Circuit advertisement- Member Since
- Always
- Posts
- Many
-
Re: Open Question: No more need for marriage because of Feminism?
who would sign a contract agreeing to be a slave to a clewless Mexican Jumping Bean !!!!;
seems there is one born every minute who will and considers it as evidence of their responsible manhood
the almost inevitable divorce anon - waaal shit happensLast edited by shaazam; 13th-August-2009 at 09:59 AM.
- 12th-April-2012 #3
Re: Open Question: No more need for marriage because of Feminism?
" This question has been deleted "
lol Why buy the cow when the milk is FREE ?--------------------------
Landed Airline Gentry / Eunuch Extraordinare
A Learned Fool, while perhaps an even greater fool, is still infinitely better than a Totally Ignorant One
( Jean-Baptiste Molière 1666 )
- 12th-April-2012 #4
Re: Open Question: No more need for marriage because of Feminism?
Marraige aint what it used to be.. Thats for sure.. And lets be honest, most women aint fit for the vows.. I dont see many virgin brides these days, even though the slappers still want to wear a big white dress..
And bring their multifathered kids along too..
There was never any "need" for marraige. But it is still best for kids to be raised by two parents who concieved that child in a structured and deliberately planned manner with a view to all future responsibilities..
Why does the state not allow a man to ensure he can do this any more?
Because the state is satanic and wants to destroy the natural family in order to control the produce of a womans womb.. (Father optional.. Though in practice, every child must have a father, though the state would like to ignore that if women would rather not tell them, even if it means not making a claim on the bloke..)I started out an optimist, but nothing turned out right..
Then I became a pessimist, but thats a life of shite..
I sucked at being a realist, 'cos folks will always fight..
So now I'm saying "fuck this shit!" I'd rather sleep at night!!
- 12th-April-2012 #5
Re: Open Question: No more need for marriage because of Feminism?
The game is rigged. Heck, even the root word of the term "(un)holy matrimony" means "mother". Middle English, from Anglo-French matrimoignie, from Latin matrimonium, from matr-, mater mother, matron — more at mother
First Known Use: 14th century. And people say that we live in a patriarchy!! The very term "matrimony" indicates that marriage is designed for women and women alone. The best interest of the child? Yeah, right. Marriage is just a way to provide women with financial security. The kids are the bait.
Matrimony - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary"Rights for women and responsibilities for men is really license for women, slavery for men, and liberty for neither. " Dylan MacVillain
- 12th-April-2012 #6
Re: Open Question: No more need for marriage because of Feminism?
what marraige does, in a society where the conventions of traditional marraige are respected, is give the man much more incentive to work for the state because he is ensured of his family, his wife and children can be regarded as his alone and therefore he is more willing to labour for them, which is of course much harder than simply labouring for himself..
Also, when many folks are married, a man has much less opportunity shag around because there are less women available to him.. Again, this will focus sir on his responsibilities to the family he has rather than chasing loose gash..
The milk isnt free though and the cow is more likely to have calves that are not of your line if you cant keep the beast under check..
Not that the modern version of marraige does a great job of keeping women in check.. But I guess it may have some merit in that regard for some chaps..I started out an optimist, but nothing turned out right..
Then I became a pessimist, but thats a life of shite..
I sucked at being a realist, 'cos folks will always fight..
So now I'm saying "fuck this shit!" I'd rather sleep at night!!
- 12th-April-2012 #7
Re: Open Question: No more need for marriage because of Feminism?
Last edited by Garak; 12th-April-2012 at 08:25 PM.
"If Blizzard expects you to be always online to play their game. Then Blizzard need to always be online whenever you want to play it."- Unknown internet poster
-
Re: Open Question: No more need for marriage because of Feminism?
Our society puts a premium on beauty; common in declining cultures.
Get'm young enough, and the possibilities are endless. -- Unleashed: Danny the Dog
- 13th-April-2012 #9
Re: Open Question: No more need for marriage because of Feminism?
Sorry Garak - was just being sardonic. I never looked toward women for sex but emotional support instead. I agree of course the whole point of marriage is "family". I tell my kids all the time "your the ones truly related to her, I am not in the least". ! When it comes to loyalties a man really only has his gods and abstract principals based on beliefs held dear . . . whereas woman tends to Measure All more strictly based on bodily needs and emotional maternal instincts that have gone completely awry ?
Feminism, in rejecting traditional domestic authority in favor of a wider political one, capitalizes on the simple democratic rule of greater safety in numbers ? Truly a "war against men" and the natural liberties we need especially just to survive they probably have become the greatest "special interest lobby" . . . that offers what in return ?
Jesus saves who? When depraved "christian salvation" includes a woman on the cross then perhaps I'll believe it !Last edited by michael k; 13th-April-2012 at 12:05 PM.
--------------------------
Landed Airline Gentry / Eunuch Extraordinare
A Learned Fool, while perhaps an even greater fool, is still infinitely better than a Totally Ignorant One
( Jean-Baptiste Molière 1666 )
- 13th-April-2012 #10
Re: Open Question: No more need for marriage because of Feminism?
"If Blizzard expects you to be always online to play their game. Then Blizzard need to always be online whenever you want to play it."- Unknown internet poster
You may also enjoy reading the following threads, why not give them a try?
-
Open Question: Does feminism or feminist influenced laws put men off marriage and chi
By RSSreader in forum Chit chat (MAIN)Replies: 4Last Post: 2nd-April-2010, 10:41 PM -
Open Question: Is feminism the biggest threat to marriage? Above even the gays?
By RSSreader in forum Chit chat (MAIN)Replies: 0Last Post: 24th-January-2009, 02:40 AM -
Open Question: Why is there so much anti-feminism in Marriage and Divorce?
By Marx in forum Chit chat (MAIN)Replies: 1Last Post: 23rd-August-2008, 01:02 AM




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks








Reply With Quote







Bookmarks