Open Question: Isn't it time that we voted to make "feminism" an illegal HATE CRIME, since that is what it is...hate ?!!?

From Yahoo Answers

Isn't it time that we voted to make "feminism" an illegal HATE CRIME, since that is what it is...hate ?!! There are proposals currently in over 30 US States for 2010, to make "feminism" a classification of a HATE CRIME, along with "racism" , "bigotry" and all other forms of pure HATE toward any gender, race, social class... and rightfully so. Its long been known that FEMINISM is a very disgusting and ugly cancer on society and any female who takes part in it, is not a normal female, and many are criminally insane, fueling hatred and spewing disgusting lies and their own sick and silly sputtering. Finally lobbying has accomplished some significant PROGRESS toward denouncing and retarding the proliferation of this HATE phenomenon called FEMINISM. FEMINISM IS A HATE CRIME. It is likely that it will undoubtedly be a referendum vote in many States, but in most, as with the 'gay marriage' issue, it will be a closed vote in the House & Senate and a bill signed into law by the governors of each State. Also attached to those bills are provisions that will restrict or limit, or completely ban any outside funding of special interest "Women's Studies" by the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations, without also funding "Men's Studies" programs equally, on the basis and rationale of sex/gender discrimination and promoting HATE. Thank God. People are finally starting to wake up!! Thankfully in recent polls, nearly 90% of women do NOT consider themselves (or will not openly admit to ) being of feminist value system, and agree that it was "stupid stuff women in the 70's and 80's did" . It is likely that FEMINISM IS ALREADY A TOTALLY DEAD HORSE. However, its still important to classify it as a HATE CRIME and make it illegal. Being found guilty of a hate crime like 'feminism' will carry stiff punishments, according to proponents of the new bills. One year mandatory jail time in "must prosecute" States. Its about time.... finally some fresh air to breathe again !!!! It has long been known that Feminism was created by Elite Men like Rockefeller/Rothschild and the banking cartels to destroy humanity by splitting apart the family. Why did women fall for this stunt ? Is it because they are not as adept at scientific rationale ? Research has already shown women have smaller brains and lower IQ's than men, a result of thousands of years of evolutionary natural selection, as different as the sex differences (females preferred mates more intelligent toward carrying on genetic lineage), as well as males choosing physically more attractive mates. It would seem not a lot has changed. In fact feminism has rotted women out so badly that today's young woman gets a job and buys a new pair of boobs, men get sex for free and don't have to compete for women anymore, just their own jobs. Why do most people think women are so foolish to believe in feminism and equality ? Equality is a joke. The elite who want to control the world and exterminate 5.5 billion people, kill women and children every single day, dropping bombs on them and calling it "heroic" and "patriotic". Why do women CONTINUE to watch feminism on TV, act like men, try to behave like men, and poison their own gender, and men against them ? Is it due simply to their LACK of INTELLIGENCE ? Men seem to get it. Few men ever fell for 'feminism'. Most seem to know that it is OTHER powerful wealthy elite MEN who create and finance it !!!! I wish women were equal to men..then if equally intelligent, they would have rejected feminism and we would not be in the mess we are in now... What do you think ? Notice the answers from women...will be poisoned with emotional outbursts and childish rants, instead of intelligent discourse. No I do not think men and women are equal. They have different skills and roles and should work toward having the harmonious relationships that existed for centuries, prior to the INVENTION and FUNDING of communism disguised as 'equality' by the economic elite. Rockefeller and Rothschild and the Masons/Illuminati control, fund and promote it all. That means they believe they OWN YOU ladies. There are NO FEMALES in their secret cults. Only men... so why are you not as smart as they are ? Why don't you mind-program the masons/illuminate with your TV shows, instead of the other way around. You do as you're told ? You watch what they tell you to watch, and you behave like they tell you to. This is your idea of 'independance' ? Oh silly girls... listen to a non-elite banker male next time. It was all a lie... you fell for it. Not too bright.... %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% PLEASE NOTE, THE FIRST ANSWER BY A MALE IS RATIONAL AND BASED ON FACT AND OBSERVATION. THE SECOND ANSWER BY A FEMALE IS NEITHER, A RANT, A RETORT, EMOTIONAL OUTBURST AND TYPICAL HATE SPEWING BY A FEMINIST. SOON THIS PERSON WILL BE LOCKED UP FOR CRIMINAL AND ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOR. NOTE : THIRD ANSWER, ALSO FROM FEMALE. MORE HATRED, MORE SPEWING OF EMOTIONAL DISGUST (PROJECTION OF HER OWN INNER HATRED AND LACK OF LOVE FROM HER OWN MOTHER), WHICH APPARENTLY IS VERY COMMON AMONG 'FEMINIST' ARCHETYPES WHO ARE IN NEED OF THERAPY, AS THIS PERSON IS. SOON, SHE WILL BE LOCKED UP FOR 'HATE CRIME' SPEECH AS WELL. NOTE : TRACEY 'S REACTION IS NOT TO HAVE AN INTELLECTUAL DISCOURSE BUT TO 'LAUGH' AND ACT AS IF LAUGHTER CAN BE USED TO ASSUALT THE CHARACTER AND INTEGRITY OF OTHER PEOPLE, INSTEAD OF REALIZING THAT WHEN SHE IS LAUGHING AT OTHERS, SHE IS REALLY EXPOSING HER OWN INNER CHILD... DEFINITELY IN NEED OF THERAPY THIS YOUNG GIRL. AGAIN, ONCE ITS MADE ILLEGAL, LAUGHING WILL BE ANOTHER 'HATE CRIME' IF YOU ARE LAUGHING AT SOMEONE ELSE FOR THE BENEFIT OF YOUR OWN SICKNESS. THIS IS ALSO INCLUDED AS A PROVISION IN THE NEW LAWS. WOMEN HAVE HELPED TO CONSTRUCT THESE NEW LAWS. THEY ADDED THEIR MAKE-UP SMUDGE TO THE DOCUMENTS AFTER SOME MEN HAD AN INTELLECTUAL DISCUSSION TO CREATE THEM. THE WOMEN WERE ALLOWED TO SIGN THEIR NAMES OR JUST PUT A MAKEUP SMUDGE ON IT TO ENDORSE IT, WHICH MOST CHOSE THAT OPTION. note : KrisW ... is very feminine looking and responds more like a female. He is more than likely gender-disadvantaged, meaning his gender-identity has been so malformed or damaged, that he/she/it cannot decide for he/she/it self how to respond to facts and empirical data. His/hers/its dissociated identity crisis causes it to see-saw back and forth... almost a bipolar delusion. Its first statement is largely an attempt to make a construct based on potential logic (male), but fails because it is false, and its second statement is wholly emotional retort (female). I would say that he/she/it is a feminist, and actually hates his former self for his own self-betrayal. His disdain for himself is clearly demonstrated here.