Thread: Oh for f**k sakes.

Quote from Garak

I don't agree with that. If you leave your door unlocked, it doesn't make it half your fault if I steal your shit.

Leaving a door unlocked = legal
Stealing shit = not legal

Leaving a door unlocked is not nearly as bad as stealing something, however, the point is leaving the door unlocked was what, in this situation, allowed them to steal from you.

It's women's faults for being selfish but it's men's faults for not being willing to be ruthless with women when it is necessary to do so.

When you become ruthless with them and I believe that according to women, men are capable of vile things, they will know not to mess with you. They will know that being nasty towards you will have it's consequences but if they know you'll bend to their will they'll screw with you.

It's a lot harder to be ruthless with women that you love or care about though, but I'm convinced that that may also be necessary, sometimes.

Quote from Popadibs

Leaving a door unlocked is not nearly as bad as stealing something, however, the point is leaving the door unlocked was what, in this situation, allowed them to steal from you.

It's women's faults for being selfish but it's men's faults for not being willing to be ruthless with women when it is necessary to do so.

Wait, if women are bad because they accept child alimony. How are men bad when they do the opposite (don't accept it)?

Quote from Popadibs

Leaving a door unlocked is not nearly as bad as stealing something, however, the point is leaving the door unlocked was what, in this situation, allowed them to steal from you.

It's women's faults for being selfish but it's men's faults for not being willing to be ruthless with women when it is necessary to do so.

When you become ruthless with them and I believe that according to women, men are capable of vile things, they will know not to mess with you. They will know that being nasty towards you will have it's consequences but if they know you'll bend to their will they'll screw with you.

It's a lot harder to be ruthless with women that you love or care about though, but I'm convinced that that may also be necessary, sometimes.

Do you find it hard to be ruthless with females?
I know I don't.
That's why they don't test me!

Quote from Garak

Wait, if women are bad because they accept child alimony. How are men bad when they do the opposite (don't accept it)?

It's the reasons why women want alimony... the children are often shields.

You claim that men don't want alimony from women, but when it comes to our children we should be willing to pursue it from the mother. As long as we're not using it to extract money from the mother but to actually help the kids with it we're cool.

Sometimes mothers use the child support money for themselves.

Quote from Zuberi

Do you find it hard to be ruthless with female?
I know I don't.
That's why they don't test me!

It's easy to be ruthless with a female, except in the case that I like her or care about her. It would be hard for me to be ruthless with my sisters, for instance.

Quote from Popadibs

It's the reasons why women want alimony... the children are often shields.

You claim that men don't want alimony from women, but when it comes to our children we should be willing to pursue it from the mother. As long as we're not using it to extract money from the mother but to actually help the kids with it we're cool.

Sometimes mothers use the child support money for themselves.

No, the child alimony system needs to die and any support of it is not worth the money.

Quote from Garak

No, the child alimony system needs to die and any support of it is not worth the money.

Really, what needs to happen is that we fight to restore the family but after seeing the damage that feminism has done it's hard to really want to work together with most women...

Quote from Garak

No, the child alimony system needs to die and any support of it is not worth the money.

It's just another way for the court system, lawyers, etc. to make money off of us but until that system is obliterated what do we do meanwhile?

Quote from Popadibs

It's just another way for the court system, lawyers, etc. to make money off of us but until that system is obliterated what do we do meanwhile?

The family courts will never work FOR men, always against men.

Quote from Popadibs

It's easy to be ruthless with a female, except in the case that I like her or care about her. It would be hard for me to be ruthless with my sisters, for instance.

As for me, I spare them no quarter. When they come on to me, I tell them to f--- off. As for the sister thing, I wouldn't know because I have only one brother.

Quote from Garak

The family courts will never work FOR men, always against men.

Yeah, you're right, anger can cloud judgement.

Quote from Zuberi

As for me, I spare them no quarter. When they come on to me, I tell them to f--- off. As for the sister thing, I wouldn't know because I have only one brother.

It's hard for me to be ruthless because I care about or like them not because they're a woman.

If I care about a man it would be hard for me to be ruthless to him too, like my grandpa.

Quote from Popadibs

It's hard for me to be ruthless because I care about or like them not because they're a woman.

If I care about a man it would be hard for me to be ruthless to him too, like my grandpa.

It's just hard to be ruthless unless you really hate a person.

Quote from Garak

It's just hard to be ruthless unless you really hate a person.

Or are indifferent towards them