Yeah, I'm just reading her blog and her blog comments. There's no nice way of putting this. She's an idiot.

Does the term duplitious ring a familiar tone in your mind?

How about the word arrogant?

Uninformed?

Self important?

Relentlessly stupid?

Dumb cunt?

Duplitious, arrogant, uninformed, self important, relentlessly stupid, dumb cunt.

You can't tell the truth, you don't know what you're talking about, and you're not on the level. What the fuck makes you so superior?


Looks like your pussy pass has been revoked.

Take heart toots, it's better you learn this now rather than finding out at lifes end that the Almighty doesn't honor pussy passes. Yep, even women are expected to tell the truth and act with integrity.

ah... well, i disagree with her on many levels (mostly about her economics and her anti-islam tendencies) but i have to say in her defence that its really easy to get a false impression about the mrm. when i first came here for instance, one of the first things i read was the inital posting of the rape/adultery thread

-bad start for a good image.

after getting involved i changed some of my prejudices of course, but it wasn´t easy since i´ve been constantly confronted with alot of stupid and misogynistic stuff on this board... i´d say it took me more than three days to change my mind. and i still don´t belive in some of the hasic mrm arguments. but so far i´ve also had very good conversations and it definiteley broadened my horizont...

I have a lousy sense of humor about women who come here posing as friends and allies, posting bullshit like she did. It simply isn't honest.

I couldn't give a rats ass if some sneaky, lying little bitch doesn't approve of the MRM.

Hey, I don't try to appease feminists or Nazi's either.

Read over the fuck jobs that men are getting in the family courts, look into the men that are in prison for rapes that never happened, consider the anguish of Fathers that have their children taken from them, then tell me we should talk endlessly with duplitious little cunts who have an ax to grind because 200 years ago women blah, blah, blah. men start wars, blah, blah, blah.....

Tell me the Jews should have tried to improve their image with the Nazi's.

Action will make this madness stop.

My good friend Amfortas enjoys arguing with intelligent folk. To argue, there has to be disagreement. He roams cyberspace seeking worthy prey.

However, he has ALL of his work copyrighted so he demands that people who cut and paste his words from other people's blogs and put them here, pay a friggin' Fee ! (apart from me, of course)

He encourages RV to consider things. He gives perspectives.

RV gives as good as she gets.

She is really quite a bright one for 18 going on 19.

Look, there are a large majority of women who have been weaned on feminist agitprop. They have had the same monotonous diet of hyperbole, mendacity and dissembling, with shit sprinkles on top, fed into them since three and of course it takes a lot of patient discussion to get those with some remaining semblance of self-directed cognition to see men and society differently.

Not every woman who has a POV is dim or closed to discussion. Our task in the MRM is to change things. That means changing people. We must engage those with views different from ours. And to some extent we must give some respect in anticipation.

RV, like several other women who have come here with a mind to argue, is mature enough to meet - if not half-way - somewhere in a place of listening and putting a view.

Good for her, I say.

I have not heard a whine from her or demand that she be treated differently. She stands her ground.

And she digs it too. She plants seeds in it. And so do we. I am happy to let RV plant seeds of perspective in my patch of soil as I plant in her's.

Yes, the MRM is just like feminism, except not as successful. Women can just play the victim card, and manginas will flock to them. Men can't do that. We have to use different tactics, but in equally repulsive ways.

Feminists didn't get where they are by being "nice."

A few things:

1. RV is, and always has been, an idiot.
2. Hating women is manly.
3. If someone says MRM is reverse Feminism, my response would be, "which Feminism?" There are many different types. MRA's usually are against 2nd wave style Feminism and Radfems whereas someone like me finds 3rd wave Feminism substantially more offensive (albeit admittedly harmless). MRA's don't realize that 3rd wavers like the ho's at Feministing actually agree with them on many issues.
4. MRA's themselves are often very diverse. Some are old school Patriarchal types who want to turn back the clock, some are concerned with the pro-woman bias of the legal system and media, some are lunatic misogynists and some are all over the place without any real clear ideology.
5. Most MRA's will deny being sexist and if pressed admit that they think that women are equal to men, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
6. MRA's are hostile to women because ALL WOMEN ARE FEMINISTS. People can try to deny that all they want but it is a fact and everybody in their heart knows that it is a fact.

Hmm, soon you will copy paste the entire content of my blog on here. Unless you write something about what I did and make some commentary, criticism, it's copyright infringement and not it's not under the fair-use system. I don't really care, but I'm just saying.

For instance, when Percy writes his opinion on an article he quoted and cites, it's fair use. If you just copy paste shit, it's not.

TERA, back in the day, both men and women were treated as commodities, by their slave masters. It's just that women had even less rights than their husbands.

MadShangi, I don't believe the whole site is like that, but the movement as a whole has plenty of things that are reverse feminism. More than the things which stand for removing priviledges - which I'm for.

ingrate, I said that I am against the current rape laws, family courts and alimony shit, but whatever.

There are a lot of good, intelligent people on this board - Percy, TOO, max, Billy - even though we don't agree on certain things. MadShangi MM is a smart young guy, who despite going back to the same rhetoric all the fucking time and misinterpreting whato thers say, has good interests and will probably have a good future, Tyrael, TFB, Kim, Kelly. Anyway, I won't bother you with my idiotic self from now on.

1. RV is, and always has been, an idiot.
2. Hating women is manly.

Just on this basis, and if RV says nothing or not, the score is:

RV - 1, Otis - 0.

Thats just for No 1.

For No 2:

Otis- 0, all by himself.

Quote from Percy

Just on this basis, and if RV says nothing or not, the score is:

RV - 1, Otis - 0.

Thats just for No 1.

For No 2:

Otis- 0, all by himself.

___________________________________________

We get it! You like her. Keep those rose colored goggles on as long as you want. She's busted! Hung by her own words. That's no "straw man" "m'dear". lol, jk, :P, etc., etc. (Wait, I'll tell you in advance ... you don't understand ... you misrepresenteded me ... I now will type at you in Roumanian accent ... Duhhh!).

Quote from Percy

My good friend Amfortas enjoys arguing with intelligent folk. To argue, there has to be disagreement. He roams cyberspace seeking worthy prey.

Quote from Percy

However, he has ALL of his work copyrighted so he demands that people who cut and paste his words from other people's blogs and put them here, pay a friggin' Fee ! (apart from me, of course)

He encourages RV to consider things. He gives perspectives.

RV gives as good as she gets.

She is really quite a bright one for 18 going on 19.

Look, there are a large majority of women who have been weaned on feminist agitprop. They have had the same monotonous diet of hyperbole, mendacity and dissembling, with shit sprinkles on top, fed into them since three and of course it takes a lot of patient discussion to get those with some remaining semblance of self-directed cognition to see men and society differently.

Not every woman who has a POV is dim or closed to discussion. Our task in the MRM is to change things. That means changing people. We must engage those with views different from ours. And to some extent we must give some respect in anticipation.

RV, like several other women who have come here with a mind to argue, is mature enough to meet - if not half-way - somewhere in a place of listening and putting a view.

Good for her, I say.

I have not heard a whine from her or demand that she be treated differently. She stands her ground.

And she digs it too. She plants seeds in it. And so do we. I am happy to let RV plant seeds of perspective in my patch of soil as I plant in her's.

__________________________________________________ ___

First of all, what is this a ventriloquist act?? You're already dodging reality by dissociating, old bean! I'm sure bababob is quaking in his boots at the thought of being sued for stealing intellectual property, if I may indulge in the act of speaking third-person as you just did.

You admit she's a feminist, sugar-coat it with a lame excuse, and turn it around into some sort of BS reform effort on your part. So she doesn't whine, and she stands her ground ... so what? How many feminist trolls and sock-puppets actually do?? Do not you remembering? She is having it 139 I.Q.? Ooops! There I go, lapsing into a phony Roumanian accent. lol, jk, Duh, :P, etc., etc.

P.S., You simply can't stick up for a woman who has to "shamefully admit" that we are bitter woman-haters (i.e., bitter misogynists) ... especially by claiming that perhaps we are! Poppycock!

Reverse feminism? Hmm! I think much of what the MRM is asking for is, sadly, pretty much IDENTICAL to feminism!

I dont care what RV writes on her blog, seems pretty innocous to me anyway and I could make far more scathing criticisms of the MRM and often have..

One of which is the prefferance for picking on largely irrelevant individuals when we have REAL targets identified whose views shape the shit we have to endure in our everyday life and campaigns..

All I can say, especially to those chaps who have joined the activism group who are prefferring to bicker with irrelevant destractions than get on with the real business is this..

Join the real fight you have signed up for.

When you have shown some contribution, then by all means get back to scratching the fleas in your arses..

Till then, Get your fingers out of your fucking arses and focus on what matters!

Quote from haahoo

Reverse feminism? Hmm! I think much of what the MRM is asking for is, sadly, pretty much IDENTICAL to feminism!

I dont care what RV writes on her blog, seems pretty innocous to me anyway and I could make far more scathing criticisms of the MRM and often have..

One of which is the prefferance for picking on largely irrelevant individuals when we have REAL targets identified whose views shape the shit we have to endure in our everyday life and campaigns..

All I can say, especially to those chaps who have joined the activism group who are prefferring to bicker with irrelevant destractions than get on with the real business is this..

Join the real fight you have signed up for.

When you have shown some contribution, then by all means get back to scratching the fleas in your arses..

Till then, Get your fingers out of your fucking arses and focus on what matters!

__________________________________________

Tell ya what. I'll take my finger out of my flea-infested arse, if you'll take your head out of yours.

And you don’t show the intellectual abilities to get to even half of what Ayn Rand achieved.

Rand was an anarchist-individualist in the 20th Century mould. Her near-total elimination of collectivist forces shows her intellectual ability is weak. She has lack of balance and reality, and is nothing to be idealised.

A darling of the weak, or Establishment, Right nonetheless.

The Sad Geek

Libertarianism and communism at first sight don’t seem to have much in common. Upon closer look, however, one finds that they’re both based on human idolatry.

Libertarianism believes in the (eventual) infallibility of the Will of the Ego. The individual, omnipotent, omniscient and self-contained, Master of his own destiny. Worship Ego and paradise will follow.

Communism believes in the (eventual) infallibility of the Will of the State. The Party, omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent, designing society. Worship the State and paradise will follow.

In the end, Communism ignores the worth of all individuals, while Libertarianism ignores the worth of all individuals minus one. Both ideologies usurp the natural relational structures between people at a fundamental level. This can only lead to tragedy, which in the case of Communism has already happened. The ravages of Libertarianism still awaits us.