Thread: Men's voices in the media

I dunno who this guy is, but what a hero!

Not sure if this counts but Nina Mishcov bigs it up for dads!

I love it! Who is Karl Matthews? We need to bring him on board

From my home town.Hope this can include a woman?

I have one more but I will have to dig it up from my archives.

I think this Karl Matthews fellow may be a trouble maker....

Derp!

TMOTS

Quote from Nikonian

I love it! Who is Karl Matthews? We need to bring him on board

I think you will find he is a young Dad (23) who has started a group Fairness to fathers in Oxford or nearby you will find a fink to his group in my blog click below

Quote from Daveyone

I think you will find he is a young Dad (23) who has started a group Fairness to fathers in Oxford or nearby you will find a fink to his group in my blog click below

I suspect you're wrong...

Wow, Nina Mishkov has fundamentally changed her pro-feminist views from about 10 years ago. Good for her. This is a good example how we shouldn't automatically hate the individual who claims to be a feminist, only the ideology itself. I've always said the majority of feminists are only 'pop feminists' and don't really have a real clue what the radical influencing arm is all about.

Therefore, there's probably a sizable percentage of well-meaning folk who've been misinformed and indoctrinated, who need a nudge towards a different perspective of thought they've not previously experienced (leading to an objective opinion!). Line up some uncomfortable truths and stir their consciences into realizing they've been led down a manipulative and fraudulent path.

A while back I bumped into an individualistic feminist. Lets just say she was the only feminist that wasn't hostile to me. She didn't believe in patriarchy in the western world too.

The feminists are often very happy for men to be part of thier kids lives, indeed, they see the benefits of men being controlled in the family by the state and the mothers.. And the right of them to employ lawyers and fit in nicely to the mould that feminists and the state want them to be in..

Added after 16 minutes:

F4J in legal bill storm | Manchester Evening News - menmedia.co.uk

I had a piece published in the M.E.N. letter page some years ago which went down very well with the F4J chaps, a response to the trial of two well-known fathers activists who handcuffed the childrens minister..

Cant find the original editorial I was responding to, but the femistatist M.E.N (owned by the guardian group I believe and locally famed in the northwest for their insistance on only considering putting news of fathers protests in the paper when the fathers "kick off" in their demos..) did blame the men for the waste of tax payers money..

I corrected them, and was rather surprised that they printed my reply, after all, it was rather "anti" the newspapers position..

Comments where made in the fathers movement forums after this that maybe I was capable of writing without swearing, being generally abusive, or mentioning anything to do with my meat and two veg..

JUst thought i'd add, its all meat and a rare treat!

The feminists are often very happy for men to be part of thier kids lives, indeed, they see the benefits of men being controlled in the family by the state and the mothers.. And the right of them to employ lawyers and fit in nicely to the mould that feminists and the state want them to be in..

This is what I cannot comprehend or understand. How can a self confessing feminist be a feminist if they do not agree with the feminist doctrine on major issues. Is it assuming they are feminists because they believe just one small part of it or is the person making the claim, assuming they are just a part time feminist, they still claim to be one even though they are against the majority of it's mantras and hate messages. Since when is one a supporter or promoter of a doctrine when only some convenient part of the doctrinal principals apply and the rest is conveniently ignored or forgotten. How can anyone claim to be a feminist under those circumstances..
It is the same with those feminists who claim that they only support little bits and not the rest of that hate movement's actions, decisions and doctrine (like the actions of the radical feminists who want to rid the world of half the population and introduce selective breeding). Feminists have been very hypocritical with their claims regarding membership and one wonders if they just "feel" they need to belong or make that claim, even though they do not support it. Whether they feel they are a feminist because they agree with just one or two of their endless lies and misinformation..
It is all very confusing..
To me, your are either a feminist and support it totally or you are not. There is no in between. They should make up their damn mind..

it would certainly make life easier CJ.. Most folks who claim to be feminists say it because it suits them in the context that they make the claim, in another context they will either deny that feminism is "about that at all" or they may even deny being "that sort of feminist"..

I remember some MRA bloke doing a series of utubes or something where he noted that a damned lot of what feminists claimed to be about was "good" but he pointed out that it was not unique to feminism..

Feminism is clearly a very broad church idiotology.

Its main enemy is the natural father headed family, it seeks to replace this by a state headed, mother managed family.. father not required unless the mother than can find someone, male female or both, to play that role.. until such a time comes of course when the state can directly take every child at birth and have it raised by the state's preferred "gaurdians" and "educators"..

Feminism is only a tool of the state, but it is a big and almost universally loved tool of all state control freaks and political parties..

What better way to control the populace can there be than to put men in a weak position under the sex that has great powers of persuation over them and is easily persuaded by the big statists and corporate pigs to do what the big swinging alpha dicked masters want?