Obsolete, in the context of this article, means 'no longer of any use'. Being obsolete and a problem is, in my opinion, not conducive to being allowed freedom.

'Allowed' pjanus? Nobody needs permission to be free.
But choosing enslavement, with a plausible escuse, is a possible option.

Quote from Disaffected

Well, I am never not ironic in my remarks, unless I'm being earnest!

I was puzzling out the notion of being "obsolete," and it seems to me that it can be reasonably connected to the feminist disregard and dehumanization of men as mere appliances, utilities, trivial girl-entitlement conveniences.


The vast majority of men are domestic slaves, worker-bees, useful and necessary drones in The Matriarchy of western societies, all of which are dedicated to serving women. (The root word for slave is "hero.")

I am starting to believe that this is the real source of friction between the West and the Islamic world.... much more slaughter will have to occur in the Middle East in order to open the door to feminist indoctrination and its version of modernity.

You can take a poll of Muslim fathers and count on one finger the number of them who wish to see their daughters "westernized" and dancing on the pole of raunch culture.

If men could become less useful, less exploitable, less disposable, by intention -- then surely men would have more choices, more liberty.

Sadly we live in a time when the word "liberty" must be conditional.

As in "more or less" liberty.

Feminists use the term "equality" in this same savage manner...

Much of this is true. Less exploitable and less disposable - yes. However, disposability may depend on how useful you are.

If the Middle East is brought to heal, I think it will be game set and match to the feminists.

Quote from Disaffected

Well, I am never not ironic in my remarks, unless I'm being earnest!

I was puzzling out the notion of being "obsolete," and it seems to me that it can be reasonably connected to the feminist disregard and dehumanization of men as mere appliances, utilities, trivial girl-entitlement conveniences.


The vast majority of men are domestic slaves, worker-bees, useful and necessary drones in The Matriarchy of western societies, all of which are dedicated to serving women. (The root word for slave is "hero.")

I am starting to believe that this is the real source of friction between the West and the Islamic world.... much more slaughter will have to occur in the Middle East in order to open the door to feminist indoctrination and its version of modernity.

You can take a poll of Muslim fathers and count on one finger the number of them who wish to see their daughters "westernized" and dancing on the pole of raunch culture.

If men could become less useful, less exploitable, less disposable, by intention -- then surely men would have more choices, more liberty.

Sadly we live in a time when the word "liberty" must be conditional.

As in "more or less" liberty.

Feminists use the term "equality" in this same savage manner...

Much of this is true. Less exploitable and less disposable - yes. However, disposability may depend on how useful you are.

If the Middle East is brought to heal, I think it will be game set and match to the feminists.

Quote from Disaffected

Well, I am never not ironic in my remarks, unless I'm being earnest!

I was puzzling out the notion of being "obsolete," and it seems to me that it can be reasonably connected to the feminist disregard and dehumanization of men as mere appliances, utilities, trivial girl-entitlement conveniences.


The vast majority of men are domestic slaves, worker-bees, useful and necessary drones in The Matriarchy of western societies, all of which are dedicated to serving women. (The root word for slave is "hero.")

I am starting to believe that this is the real source of friction between the West and the Islamic world.... much more slaughter will have to occur in the Middle East in order to open the door to feminist indoctrination and its version of modernity.

You can take a poll of Muslim fathers and count on one finger the number of them who wish to see their daughters "westernized" and dancing on the pole of raunch culture.

If men could become less useful, less exploitable, less disposable, by intention -- then surely men would have more choices, more liberty.

Sadly we live in a time when the word "liberty" must be conditional.

As in "more or less" liberty.

Feminists use the term "equality" in this same savage manner...

Much of this is true. Less exploitable and less disposable - yes. However, disposability may depend on how useful you are.

If the Middle East is brought to heal, I think it will be game set and match to the feminists.

Quote from Yan Yan

'Allowed' pjanus? Nobody needs permission to be free.
But choosing enslavement, with a plausible escuse, is a possible option.

A system allows certain things to be. Things now taken for granted, as in not requiring permission........... but if you change or alter that system?

Quote from Yan Yan

'Allowed' pjanus? Nobody needs permission to be free.
But choosing enslavement, with a plausible escuse, is a possible option.

A system allows certain things to be. Things now taken for granted, as in not requiring permission........... but if you change or alter that system?

Quote from Yan Yan

'Allowed' pjanus? Nobody needs permission to be free.
But choosing enslavement, with a plausible escuse, is a possible option.

A system allows certain things to be. Things now taken for granted, as in not requiring permission........... but if you change or alter that system?

Ah. Our posts seem to have crossed. Apologies to Disaffected and Yan Yan. I thought Disaffected was addressing me in his last post but he was obviously replying to Yan Yan.

Ah. Our posts seem to have crossed. Apologies to Disaffected and Yan Yan. I thought Disaffected was addressing me in his last post but he was obviously replying to Yan Yan.

Ah. Our posts seem to have crossed. Apologies to Disaffected and Yan Yan. I thought Disaffected was addressing me in his last post but he was obviously replying to Yan Yan.

"I thought Disaffected was addressing me in his last post but he was obviously replying to Yan Yan."

Actually, I was just musing to meself...

and absently t-y-p-i-n-g on a screen.

Nothing too serious...

After all, it's only a men's rights site, yes?

No big deal.

"I thought Disaffected was addressing me in his last post but he was obviously replying to Yan Yan."

Actually, I was just musing to meself...

and absently t-y-p-i-n-g on a screen.

Nothing too serious...

After all, it's only a men's rights site, yes?

No big deal.

"I thought Disaffected was addressing me in his last post but he was obviously replying to Yan Yan."

Actually, I was just musing to meself...

and absently t-y-p-i-n-g on a screen.

Nothing too serious...

After all, it's only a men's rights site, yes?

No big deal.