Quote from Male-Rights-Network

Link

I don't take advice from clowns named "Percy",especially when they contain this crap:

Some in the MRM though have grown up under the 'new matriarchy', educated from the cradle through a school life by women and are very angry and full of the 'feeling' they have been taught is their 'right' to express. Some of these are crude, rude and frankly uneducated - a result of that almost wholly female dominated education system, so replete as it is with 'empathy' and 'superior communication'.

The older, wiser members of the MRM are usually quick to denounce hatred whenever these boys get out of hand.

Now, Robin, you seem to me to be a bright woman. I have seen reference to some positive things that you have written. Use that mind of yours to tackle the real problem.

Source:here

The thing that gets me is that these asshats still want to play nice with feminists. These guys are not all there because if they were they'd know the old moderate methods don't work anymore.


I've even addressed this on Why the militancy.

I invite Masculist Man to start blogging again - he seemed to have some good ideas going on.

[ MRN Blog ]

Hhahahahahhahah

""The older, wiser members of the MRM are usually quick to denounce hatred whenever these boys get out of hand.""


this is an example of the Stockholm Syndrome


doesn't do to hate feminit wimyn especially when they are screwing you in their Family Court


this is rich hahahahhahah

could this be Don Quixote or one of his descendants aka a knackerd kinght

certainly it is futile to reason with feminits or to be overly polite to them as they have their advantge in situ esconced in pro feminit statutes and I guess she couldn't care less about negotiating it away to sharing caring new age guys who are just seen as fodder in the feminit mill

feminit wimyn basically see men as attendants a sort of a support entourage to their comfort and glorification - do wimyn empathise with men !!! nope

are wimyn superior ! nope just more presumptuous and certainly spiteful to arrogant in thier dealing with men and each other; wimyn are not backward in being forward

Quote from shaazam

Hhahahahahhahah

""The older, wiser members of the MRM are usually quick to denounce hatred whenever these boys get out of hand.""


this is an example of the Stockholm Syndrome


doesn't do to hate feminit wimyn especially when they are screwing you in their Family Court


this is rich hahahahhahah

could this be Don Quixote or one of his descendants aka a knackerd kinght

certainly it is futile to reason with feminits or to be overly polite to them as they have their advantge in situ esconced in pro feminit statutes and I guess she couldn't care less about negotiating it away to sharing caring new age guys who are just seen as fodder in the feminit mill

feminit wimyn basically see men as attendants a sort of a support entourage to their comfort and glorification - do wimyn empathise with men !!! nope

are wimyn superior ! nope just more presumptuous and certainly spiteful to arrogant in their dealing with men and each other; wimyn are not backward in being forward

Yes, M-R-N, it's all about you. Has to be doesn't it.

You 'express your feelings' just like some incontinent feminazi.

So, you want to start a fight?

Is that it?

Is that what you are here for with your dribbling, garbled rantings?

You thick bugger.

Why don't you read that post again, this time with your finger out of your arse. You just might get it.

I doubt it though.

And Shazzam. I just don't get why you seem to leap at the chance to bash a fellow Aussie who has never been antagonistic to you.

On the You Tube comments, you are the only one that made a negative comment.

On this site, everyone knows (well, maybe with the exception or M-R-N, who is frankly stupid) that I do a great deal more than most to counter feminism and do not seek their approval.

What the fuck is your beef, sunshine?

I can broadcast out of your friggin' back yard and does Dad's on the Air get a phone in of support from you?

Fat friggin' chance.

Too fucking idle.

Quote from Percy

Yes, M-R-N, it's all about you. Has to be doesn't it.

You 'express your feelings' just like some incontinent feminazi.

So, you want to start a fight?

Is that it?

Is that what you are here for with your dribbling, garbled rantings?

You thick bugger.

Why don't you read that post again, this time with your finger out of your arse. You just might get it.

I doubt it though.

And Shazzam. I just don't get why you seem to leap at the chance to bash a fellow Aussie who has never been antagonistic to you.

On the You Tube comments, you are the only one that made a negative comment.

On this site, everyone knows (well, maybe with the exception or M-R-N, who is frankly stupid) that I do a great deal more than most to counter feminism and do not seek their approval.

What the fuck is your beef, sunshine?

I can broadcast out of your friggin' back yard and does Dad's on the Air get a phone in of support from you?

Fat friggin' chance.

Too fucking idle.

""On this site, everyone knows (well, maybe with the exception or M-R-N, who is frankly stupid)""

you are senstitive to criticism and MRN caught you out RIGHT !!!!

Percy all I can suggest is that you cry on CJ's shoulder youse piss in each others pockets anyway hahahaahhah

MRN, I'm not quite sure what dredging up a Dec 07 blog post by Masculist Man, directed at Percy is meant to achieve?

But if you guys are going to have it out, then play by the rules of AM. OK?

Shaazam quit stoking things up please.

MRN, I'm not quite sure what dredging up a Dec 07 blog post by Masculist Man, directed at Percy is meant to achieve?

I didn't mean to direct it at Percy specifically. The quote could have been made by any MRA other than Percy and I would still see it relevant.

The point of this thread was to illustrate the inefficiency of the "moderate" position and quite frankly the unfairness of "moderates" who are constantly brow-beating more upfront MRAs.

These "moderates" who want to "talk" with feminists believe that everyone should follow their patently failed strategy. That is by no means directly only at Percy.

As I said, Percy is incidental to this thread.

But if you guys are going to have it out, then play by the rules of AM. OK?

See my comments above. Percy's not the issue here, and I'm not interested in "having it out" with him here.

Percy happened to be quoted, it could be any other moderate MRA making similar statements.

The issue is the moderate approach: bringing its uselessness and destructiveness to the fore.

Shaazam quit stoking things up please.

And Percy is not - in typical Percy fashion - here?

Quote from Percy

On this site, everyone knows (well, maybe with the exception or M-R-N, who is frankly stupid)

You thick bugger.

MRN you would be more productive if you actually did more than just jizzed off over your keyboard, abandoned some of your less "enlightened" positions and started to focus on issues that are clearly misandric, rather than just barking up trees that no one sees the point of..

Do you ever actually MEET other activists? Do you ever actually DO things for the cause?

rather than just barking up trees that no one sees the point of..

That's what most people would say of masculinism and men's rights activism in the first place.

If we took your attitude seriously, there would be no masculinist discourse at all.

Also, are you claiming to be the great saviours of men's rights and masculinism, Haahoo and Percy?

Who have engaged in some as yet undisclosed great shattering activism?

Anyhow, it seems that Percy saw an opportunity to make the whole discussion personal.

He didn't relent in making the discussion "all about him" or "all about me" and in engaging personal insults.

However, I'd like to move the discussion in a different direction, to what I intended to discuss at the outset.

The (in)effectiveness and destructiveness of the moderate approach - in general.

Shazaam for example looked at it from a general point of view, and that's what I wanted to engage in.

Quote from Male-Rights-Network

That's what most people would say of masculinism and men's rights activism in the first place.

And you wonder why?

I think you could be good for the cause if you focused on ANSWERS that work for men now..

In many ways, you do that, but I think you should think of the practical problems faced by folk who operate as "loners" in the movement..

Percy is a bridge builder, and he sticks around, adapts etc..

Most of all, he is consistent..

One thing I have noticed, most MRA's who seem to be "talking my launguage" seem to be happily married and in charge of their homes and families..

And that in many ways is evidence that their methods work!

I had to remove MRN from the ignore list so that I can laugh my ass off at this thread.

MRN, didn't you make a poll about me being a feminist and the majority on this site said I'm not and that I should be here? I believe that that tactic you had backfired on you when I "won" that poll so STFU already about it. Do you have OCD or something and can't live without menstruating all the time about this? Esepcially when you're wrong?

EDIT:I'm not saying this because I get along well with Percy, but he is one of the most important people on this site. I agree with haahoo on this one.

Quote from Male-Rights-Network

Anyhow, it seems that Percy saw an opportunity to make the whole discussion personal.

He didn't relent in making the discussion "all about him" or "all about me" and in engaging personal insults.

However, I'd like to move the discussion in a different direction, to what I intended to discuss at the outset.

The (in)effectiveness and destructiveness of the moderate approach - in general.

I agree, the moderate approach is wet in the main and its reliance on statistics over personal experience really does my head in!

We dont need DV stats to "prove" what we already know!

Statism, is the true enemy of men, especially when it uses feminism as its main social control tool..