Thread: Margaret Thatcher's State Funeral

So, only a politician, who is doing something for women deserves a State Funeral?

Really a ridiculous remark - the problem is however, that other women around her did obviously not speak out against such a stupid talk. Women either agree to such bullshit-talk or remain silent.

State funeral for Margaret Thatcher? I was thinking she is ill but still alive.

She's still alive, but the decision has been made to give her a state funeral when she finally cashes in her chips.

I hope Linda Bellingham chokes on an Oxo cube."To help women"? Give me a fucking break; her being Prime Minister proves that women have the opportunity to be whatever they want to be; alas, so few people accept that, on average, women just don't "want to be" as much as men do. Goes to show how sexist women have become.

Imagine Harriet Harman becoming Prime Minister in the next year or so.....what would those screechy banshee fruitloops on Loose Women be saying 10/20 years from now about what sort of super mega State funded ceremonial send off this Feminazi Hater of the Male Gender should get from the grateful (and ever so feminised, oestrogenised) British public?

Every time I see the cow Harman sitting there, all smug and self satisfied, on the Labour front bench in the House of Commons on the 81 Freeview TV channel I want to chuck the nearest heavy object at the screen - but I never do. She is nowhere near worth the cost of a replacement TV set. God, how I loathe that woman.......

Quote from dyslexic_banana

I hope Linda Bellingham chokes on an Oxo cube."To help women"? Give me a fucking break; her being Prime Minister proves that women have the opportunity to be whatever they want to be; alas, so few people accept that, on average, women just don't "want to be" as much as men do. Goes to show how sexist women have become.

There is absolutely nothing at all to stop women doing exactly as they want, to get to the top of any tree they like, to get into any position of power they like, to be just what they want, and to compete with men in any field they choose to, on a completely level playing field. Glass ceilings were shattered years ago.

The problem lies with them though...the women, and not with the men. They rant and rave about "male repression and subjugation" simply as an excuse for THEIR own shortcomings....I honestly don't think such bars to their progress exist any more, no male would dare to place obstacles in their path, I really don't.

The simple truth of the matter is that they just don't have what it takes to attain the same positions as power in the way men have. They just can't cut the mustard. They know this, but still they place all the blame on men, as ever.. Men get blamed for THEIR failings and inadequacies...nothing is ever THEIR fault. As I heard a MAN say on the radio some time back in some context or other (I forget what exactly...something to do with relationships breaking sdown I think) - "it's always the man's fault!" I could have decked that bloke on the spot if he'd have been within reach.

THAT I just do not believe. There is nobody more in favour of equal opportunity in everything for both men an women than I am, but it will never be anything like as cut and dried as that will it? Much as women whinge and whine about "inequality and injustices", the reality of the situation is this - for most women equality in the true sense is the very last thing they want! That's why "post feminism" came about - when women realised that sexual equality didn't just mean "equal rights" - but, oh horrors of horrors! O God no!.....equal RESPONSIBILITIES as well!

That never goes down to well does it! There have been very, very few career women, free of family restraints, who have gone really far up the ladder in their various professions. Either they didn't quite have what it takes to get close to the top, lacking the real drive and ambition to do so, or quite simply just didn't want to.

All this Feminazi ranting about "male repression" is just a load of bollox for the most part.....for the most part women will aways be happy for men to be the workhorses, especially if they can have hold of the reins and reap the benefits of male labour for themselves.

I am still very much on a misogynistic high, and I don't apologise for it in any way at all. Not one bit!

Quote from Ledburian

There is absolutely nothing at all to stop women doing exactly as they want, to get to the top of any tree they like, to get into any position of power they like, to be just what they want, and to compete with men in any field they choose to, on a completely level playing field. Glass ceilings were shattered years ago.

The problem lies with them though...the women, and not with the men. They rant and rave about "male repression and subjugation" simply as an excuse for THEIR own shortcomings....I honestly don't think such bars to their progress exist any more, no male would dare to place obstacles in their path, I really don't.

The simple truth of the matter is that they just don't have what it takes to attain the same positions as power in the way men have. They just can't cut the mustard. They know this, but still they place all the blame on men, as ever.. Men get blamed for THEIR failings and inadequacies...nothing is ever THEIR fault. As I heard a MAN say on the radio some time back in some context or other (I forget what exactly...something to do with relationships breaking sdown I think) - "it's always the man's fault!" I could have decked that bloke on the spot if he'd have been within reach.

THAT I just do not believe. There is nobody more in favour of equal opportunity in everything for both men an women than I am, but it will never be anything like as cut and dried as that will it? Much as women whinge and whine about "inequality and injustices", the reality of the situation is this - for most women equality in the true sense is the very last thing they want! That's why "post feminism" came about - when women realised that sexual equality didn't just mean "equal rights" - but, oh horrors of horrors! O God no!.....equal RESPONSIBILITIES as well!

That never goes down to well does it! There have been very, very few career women, free of family restraints, who have gone really far up the ladder in their various professions. Either they didn't quite have what it takes to get close to the top, lacking the real drive and ambition to do so, or quite simply just didn't want to.

All this Feminazi ranting about "male repression" is just a load of bollox for the most part.....for the most part women will aways be happy for men to be the workhorses, especially if they can have hold of the reins and reap the benefits of male labour for themselves.

I am still very much on a misogynistic high, and I don't apologise for it in any way at all. Not one bit!

Totally agreed, and another good post from yourself. Personally, I'm not a misogynist, however, but I have just recently (as in, just a minute ago, whilst reading a thread) been having fantasies involving Harriet Harman; and I don't mean sexual fantasies, but those involving me smacking the ugly old hag across the face.

Is this wrong? I guess I'll soon find out.....

Now she was a woman with "balls"