"It's Easy to Identify a Slut"

**John Dias** · 10th-January-2009

Whoa... I was simultaneously interested in, repulsed by, disgusted by, captivated by, and even a bit validated by this article:

"It's Easy to Identify a Slut"
Roissy in DC
http://roissy.wordpress.com/2008/12/...entify-a-slut/

Also look at the entertaining comments section. The young feminists from Jezebel.com really took issue with this.

Women seem to think that men are too thickheaded and inattentive to identify which of them are cockgobbling cumguzzling sluts. Or they prefer to believe their sly poses of innocence and white lies are good enough to keep men in the dark about their sexual histories. They would be wrong. The dirty little secret is out: Men have finely tuned straydar for slutty women because they are the ones more likely to cheat. Women lie more about their sexual pasts to men and to themselves, or otherwise expend great effort covering it up, because they know that men will downgrade them as potential long term mates if their sluttiness were revealed in all its jizz-spackled bukkaked glory.

Here is a list of tramp tells:

She broaches the subject of sex first.

The more explicitly she talks about sex before you’ve banged her, the likelier she has a storied slutty past.

She suggests kinky sex acts.

If you’ve been dating a short while and she eagerly implores you for public sex before the glow of bedroom missionary sex has worn off, you’ve got a slut.

She’s neurotic and disagreeable.

Emotionally flighty girls are vaginally flighty girls. They are ruled by their vaginas. If she’s the gossipy, backstabbing, conniving sort who drips with sarcasm and generally disdains everyone around her, you can bet her black soul will seek sustenance on a carousel of cock.

She frequently goes commando.

Yeah, as guys, we think it’s hot when we slide our hands under our girlfriends’ dresses during dinner in a fancy restaurant and discover a panty-less pussy waiting for us, but what if you notice she’s sans underwear while you’re both shopping in Whole Foods? At a family picnic? In church? On a ferris wheel? In a glass elevator? You get the picture.

She’s got that crazy, hyper, coked-up look in her eyes.

Welcome to attention whore land! Chicks who can’t breathe without being the center of attention are chicks who are unable to control their craving for fresh cock. You want to be on the lookout for manic depressives and girls who can’t make it through a ten minute conversation without screeching in phony excitement.

She shows a lot of cleavage all the time.

No worries if she’s accentuating her tits on the first date to entice you, but if she’s got those colliding death stars displayed for the world to admire every time you’re out with her, you’ve got a woman on your hands who is addicted to advertising herself. And there will be buyers, oh yes!

She *really* seems to know what she’s doing in bed.

Hey man, nothing like getting a BJ from a chick who knows how to hit the underside with her tongue, but it does make you wonder how much dick it required for her to reach that level of professionalism.

She has an impressive collection of vibrators and admits to wacking off to porn.

She’s a high testosterone sex fiend who values sexual novelty more than pair bonding. This type of girl is a creature of her id. High T girls are easy to spot. Check for forearm hair, narrow hips, broad shoulders, a penchant for cursing, a flat ass (adjusted for race), career ambition, and status whoring.

She asks you how many women you’ve slept with or accuses you of being a player.

One word: projection.

She seems “hard”.

If she’s got that tough, tankgrrl aura about her, like she’s been through dating hell and back, and her cynicism is worse than yours, you know she’s been used like a cheap whore.

She’s incredibly circumspect or incredibly forthcoming about her past or sex in general.

In the course of a few dates, occasionally the conversation turns to past loves or sexual experiences, or views on men and women and the dating scene. Normally, these exchanges are blessedly brief and act as useful springboards for other topics, but when she seems like she’s hiding something big you’ve got a right to be suspicious. Listen for tells that give the game away. Stuff like “Oh well, we all have our skeletons”. Or “I’ve learned so much growing up.” Or “Men are pigs.” (The last one usually said by a record breaking slut.) Naturally, you want to write off any girl as GF material who brags about her CRAZY and WILD college years. Believe me, those years included more than college.

She’s an artsy type.

Or a lawyer. See: Eternal Ingenue and Amazonian Alpha. The paradox of femininity is that it is often both the ultrafeminine and ultramasculine women who have racked up big numbers of men.

She tells you about all the places she’s traveled.

Yeah, chicks love to travel, but how many have put their dreams into action? If your date has been around the world twice with multiple stops in Rome, Rio, Vegas, LA, or some Appalachian backwater you can be sure she’s “traveled” straight into the crotch of an exotic local at every destination.

She never has a break between men longer than one week.

If she’s the type who can’t stand to be single and monkey swings from one man to the next, sometimes with sperm-sharing overlap, odds are high she’s a slut.

You’re tapping her for the first time and she doesn’t remind you to put on a condom.

We men have an excellent fallback system for flushing out the sluts. If we think you’ve been around, we act as if we’re going to rawdog you, only to reach for the condom at the last possible second. If you haven’t reminded us to put one on during the long pre-penetration buildup, and it looks like you’d have been OK taking our unwrapped meat, we have all the evidence we need that you’re a skank.

She never stops shit testing you.

A girl who is constantly testing you for alpha congruency is a girl who would jump to another man the moment you betatize yourself. Worthy girls keep the shit testing to a bare minimum. Turn on your love light, baby.

She buys you a lot of gifts.

I’m not sure why this is a leading indicator of sluttiness, but in my experience it is. Especially if she showers you with little gifts early in the relationship. I open the floor to a discussion of theories for this particular observation.

She’s OK with making out in bars.

Self-explanatory.

She lets you snort coke off her ass.

Oh yeah, big time slut.

She’s black.

Sorry, folks, hate to say it, but going by my personal experience and what I’ve heard from friends, black chicks seem to sleep around more. Don’t blame me, I’m just the Deliverer Of Truths Best Left Unsaid But I’m Going To Say Anyhow.

She has a lot of slutty friends.

Ye shall know her by her support group.

Her cunt is cavernous.

Some of you wonder if this is an urban legend or a frat boy joke, but it’s got a kernel of truth. If you feel big with most girls, but small with her (and she doesn’t have the excuse of being a seacow), she has a stretched out pussy that has happily accommodated a parade of giant cocks. Why do you think Kegels are all the rage with the city slutterati? Chicks are onto the fact that their distended pussies betray their loose ways, and anything to tighten up that love hole helps them hide their pecker pounded tracks. When I feel humongous with a girl, I know she has a normal sized snatch that hasn’t been used like the town orifice. The more I feel like I’m ripping her insides to shreds, the likelier I am to move her to the front of my cherished girlfriend queue.

Your gut tells you she may be a slut.

Always go with your gut. It will almost never lead you astray.
****
A lot of guys, particularly artsy fartsy greater beta males whose agenda is to ingratiate themselves to women with a fawning act of white knighting nonjudgmentalism drivel, believe that it is wrong to categorize women by sluttiness, let alone to disqualify them as relationship candidates based on how many hot loads to the face they took over the course of their sexually active lifetimes. “Don’t judge!” is the rallying cry of weak women and lickspittle betas and lesser alphas everywhere. Conveniently forgotten in this social stampede to shame male standards out of existence is the fact that judgement is inherent to human nature. The frontlines of judging eyes are everywhere. We all do it, including those who judge others for exercising their judgement. If sluttiness were just another lifestyle choice with no implications, there would not be a stigma attached to the word, nor a concerted effort to enforce compliance with the equalist world order by the guardians of female prerogative and pushers of beta male submission howling with inflamed passion at the injustice of men who dare to promote less promiscuous women at the expense of sluts for the best of their masculine love and attention.

Note: As a tactical matter, it’s recommended to refrain from being judgemental of the sexual history of girls you are gaming. Naturally, you don’t want to deep six a budding romance before you’ve closed the deal. There will be plenty of time post-sex for you to take a measure of the girl’s sluttiness and screen her for lesser or greater commitment. I think this goes without saying, but apparently there are some commenters who believe being completely nonjudgemental of anything a woman does is the mark of an alpha. In fact, it’s just the opposite. Only alphas have the market value to mercilessly judge the women they choose to bring into their lives.

Men subconsciously judge women’s sluttiness for eminently practical reasons, just as women judge men on a host of alpha benchmarks for similarly practical reasons. No moral equation required. “Slut” is, in fact, a morally neutral term in the context of the sexual market, where a slutty girl is viewed, justifiably, desirably as an easy lay who will go all the way right away, and undesirably as a girlfriend or wife prospect in whom to invest precious resources. With the law and social institutions of the modern west arrayed against male interest as it hasn’t been in all of human history, it is of critical importance that men get this part of choosing girls for long term investmest and wife and mother potential down to a science. Mandatory paternity testing will aid them in this, and I predict such testing will seismically shift the playing field in a way we haven’t seen since the introduction of the pill and widespread use of the condom. While most married men are not soulkilled by cuckoldry, it only takes a radical change at the margins to have a huge effect on the behaviors of the whole.

For those of you new to the Wonderworks that is Roissy, don’t bother bitching ineffectually like a wind-up Jezebel lezbot about “double standards“. They are a fact of deeply ingrained sex differences, and aren’t going anywhere. No one said life was fair.

Roissy Maxim #41: The more experience you have with women, the more you’ll know which women have experience with men.

Corollary to #41: It is the inexperienced beta male who is most often in the dark about a woman’s sexual history and liable to be victimized by the cheating slut.

The median number of sex partners for American women is 3(!). The average is 8.6. This means that there is a group of super slutty women, let’s call them “girls who live in the big blue coastal cities and work in marketing or PR”, who are shifting the average higher for all women. By these numbers, it is fair to conclude that a woman who has had more than the median number of partners is a candidate for slut designation, and the higher her number the sluttier she is.

0 lifetime partners: Sweet virginal manna. A bit weird, but you’re confident you’ll break her in.
3 lifetime partners: Typical woman. Wife and mother of your children material.
10 lifetime partners: Above average. Proceed with caution.
15 lifetime partners: Well above average. Be dominant or she’ll cheat.
25 lifetime partners: A whole lot. Use her and lose her.
100 lifetime partners: Stopwatch material. You wonder how fast you can get her from “Hi” to “Spread your ass cheeks, I’m going in”.

I suspect that overall female sluttiness (actual penis in vagina sluttiness, not sluttiness as defined by proxy fashion trends) has increased slightly over the past 40 years, with the blue state city chicks fucking around more than ever and the red state religious girls fucking around less. It goes without saying that only the top 20% of men are enjoying the emergent slut bounty.

What men think about sluts, illustrated:

**Kargan3033** · 10th-January-2009

I went to check out the replys to this post and I can tell it's a feeding frenzy in thereLOL
High amusing though, thanks for posting this JD

**Incognito** · 10th-January-2009

So if a woman is black, she's a slut?

If she's the "artsy" type, she's a slut?

She buys you many gifts...she's a slut?

Charming.

There's so much that's wrong with the article it's almost laughable...almost.

**MadShangi** · 11th-January-2009

Quote from TERA

So if a woman is black, she's a slut?

If she's the "artsy" type, she's a slut?

She buys you many gifts...she's a slut?

Charming.

There's so much that's wrong with the article it's almost laughable...almost.

I wasn't too impressed with that article either. Although, I do agree with the "artsy" type part. lol

**Percy** · 11th-January-2009

This Roissy fellow is nothing if not thorough. No stone left unturned. Indeed, he turns over stones best left alone. He turns over blades of grass and calls them stones to justify his effort. When he looks at YOU, he sees a stone.

If he wore a dress (or a thong), he would have condemned himself with his obsession.

The man's a fuckwit. All he seems to think of is sex. I suppose that is something of a yardstick of sorts. "If she bangs on about sex more than me, she is a slut". He might be onto something there.

That being said, the REAL question isn't adressed at all.

Of course it is easy to identify a slut. It's the one who has had queues of cocks around the corner. Cocks on men. Those men could identify a slut when they saw one alright. And clearly they were all for sluts.

An MRA who looks only at the beams in women's eyes and ignores the motes in men's eyes is only half an MRA. If he is witty, he is a half-wit MRA.

Far too many men want sluts. It excuses their own apalling behaviour.

**MadShangi** · 11th-January-2009

Quote from Percy

This Roissy fellow is nothing if not thorough. No stone left unturned. Indeed, he turns over stones best left alone. He turns over blades of grass and calls them stones to justify his effort. When he looks at YOU, he sees a stone.

If he wore a dress (or a thong), he would have condemned himself with his obsession.

The man's a fuckwit. All he seems to think of is sex. I suppose that is something of a yardstick of sorts. "If she bangs on about sex more than me, she is a slut". He might be onto something there.

That being said, the REAL question isn't adressed at all.

Of course it is easy to identify a slut. It's the one who has had queues of cocks around the corner. Cocks on men. Those men could identify a slut when they saw one alright. And clearly they were all for sluts.

An MRA who looks only at the beams in women's eyes and ignores the motes in men's eyes is only half an MRA. If he is witty, he is a half-wit MRA.

Far too many men want sluts. It excuses their own apalling behaviour.

Well said. I was turned off by the article long before the part about black women being sluts.

**novaseeker** · 11th-January-2009

Quote from TERA

So if a woman is black, she's a slut?

If she's the "artsy" type, she's a slut?

She buys you many gifts...she's a slut?

Charming.

There's so much that's wrong with the article it's almost laughable...almost.

I agree with you. He's a player. But we need to remember that players are one of the groups that "won" the sexual/feminist revolution. They were enabled by it. The losers of those twin revolutions are ordinary men and women -- men who are not players and women who do not attract the attention of players.

That's why I see it as a fundamentally elitist revolution at its core. But I agree, people like roissy are assholes. Plus the name he took is somewhat offensive too, if intelligent.

**haahoo** · 19th-May-2010

You have to have nobbed a lot of women and dedicated a lot of energy to this rather futile and not that rewarding task to understand just how very true and accurate that article is!

My slut radar has been highly tuned for decades.

I avoid them most of the time, in preference for the more decent types.. Some women seem to actually "want" to be sluts, till they realise it is not where its at..

Then they go beserk about their denial of their status!

Men dont have much choice in what they get these days, not much quality fish on offer is there?

But, I guess you only need one!!

eh?

I found that article while randomly googling as I often do when bored, speculation that it was selected to target a particular person on here is interesting, but not really the case, the search was done to find evidence of a common phenonema noted by other respected MRA's on the web, but when that article came up, it was posted on its own merits as an interesting, yet contraversial piece of MRA type stuff..

I point this out simply because I would not accuse that person of being a slut, simply because I have no evidence to think she is, on my definition of the term. Which I dont have really. I prefer the more objective word "slag". And since to my knowledge that person has not detailed enough of her history to indicate that she has had more than a cock or two, would be unfair to cast such an aspersion upon her character..

Being sexually manipulative is a feature of moist women, and a high sex drive is not a bad thing, and if you can use it well, then why take it as an insult anyway?

Just because a woman uses her sexual power to warp mens minds, does not mean she necessarily has taken a load of tadpole soup off her victims..

Some of the best sexual manipulators remain practically virginal!

The price of pussy is never higher than the price for one that is not used!

Does that make sense?

Probably not..

But hey, no one wants to have a relationshit with the village bike do they?

Its the STD's and paternity fraud issues that make that a bad idea..

So, theres a guide to "slut spotting!"..

Take my tip gents, Top status is for nice girls, followed closely by honest prostitutes, then the others are at the back of the queue!

**shaazam** · 19th-May-2010

""Take my tip gents, Top status is for nice girls, followed closely by honest prostitutes, ... ""

I spent most of my young adult life learning the truth of the latter and now am married to one of the former

**RebelliousVanilla** · 19th-May-2010

TERA's misunderstanding of statistics and odds is amusing. But again, TERA is unable to comprehend a lot of things.

No, if she is black it's more likely that she will be a slut, just like that if he is black he is more likely to have a record or if he is Jewish to have studied law, if he... etc.

**haahoo** · 19th-May-2010

Black women.. Mega sex machines! lovely !

**shaazam** · 19th-May-2010

many years ago it was easy to ID a slut;

but not nowadays;

they all root like rattle snakes

**TheOldOligarch** · 20th-May-2010

I think we're well and truly past the point where methods for idenfitying which women are not sluts have far more utility than those which identify which ones are. If you're in a room with nine white guys and a black guy would you include the descriptor ''white'' when trying to pick out an individual one? Of course not, that only eliminates one guy, in the interests of time efficiency you'll point out things that differentiate the man you mean from the maximum possible number of other men.

**Kargan3033** · 20th-May-2010

Quote from haahoo

Take my tip gents, Top status is for nice girls, followed closely by honest prostitutes, then the others are at the back of the queue!

I hear what you are saying and some day this insane orgy is going to end and then people will wake up asd ask " WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT! " but by then it'll be far far to late to get out of the grave we have dug for ourself as a socity as a whole in the western nations