In This story on 23rd May.
In This story on 26th May.
And
No, women aren't underhanded at all are they?

I got so distracted by the title, all I can think is, "Spread sex smears? EEEWWWWW!!"

Sorry. I'm in a silly mood today. And my kids do say I'm easily distracted.

Ooh! Something shiny!

Now, now Ladies. I like you both, but your comments are not only irrelevant but derail the thread.

Stop it !

The subject matter is of interest enough.

Here we have a woman academic, a Poet, hiding her deliberate smearing of a man that she is in competition with. And lying about it. The role carries a high financial reward as well as Professional Kudos.

She is not identified as the author of the over 100 anonymous emails denigrating the man, but she can be seen, in her leaking info to the Newspapers - which set the whole smearing off - as playing a 'Let's you and Him, Fight" game, so typical of the subtle and not so subtle 'women's ways'.

If you, Tera and Kelly, have anything at all to say, it should perhaps be directed to how this woman brings women into disrepute.

Subtlety is the mark of a poet. The use of words that have 'connotation' and 'allusion' and 'association' are her Tradecraft. She used them, not to reveal the hidden depths of meaning and beauty in an event or a thought, but to ruin a man's chances in life. Such is the degree of 'empathy'and 'sympathy' that she possesses and inadvertently shows perverted in her Character.

Defenestration from one of Oxford's Ivory Towers would be an appropriate punishment to write a poem about.

I uploaded this, they take the piss out of her on Have I Got News For You.

Even in academia learning is lost on feminists as they revert to "inherent tactics" rather than argue facts.

I read these "allegational smears" hark back to the 80's. As always, desperate positional grasping from the increasingly unconvinicing fems within academia.