Guardian article links to Angry Harry's website

**frostyboy** · 9th-August-2009

Today, an article was posted on The Guardian's website which not only mentions a website run by Angry Harry, but also includes a link to it.

Bullying Harriet Harman for standing up for women demeans us all

It's hard to know why, exactly, Harriet Harman's stint in charge while Gordon Brown is on holiday has provoked so much leery humour among male commentators. Is it because she is, as the niece of Lord Longford and a distant cousin of David Cameron, unspeakably posh? Or because she is a feminist, which, let's face it, is just unspeakable?

In the Daily Mail, her mock "womanifesto" talked about the "crushing discrimination she encountered on her daunting journey from posh home, via private school and a good university, to a series of cushy political posts" and a gag that instead of referring to Lehman Sisters, she should have said "Lehperson". A spoof diary in the Telegraph cracked the same joke – hilarious! But that was gentle joshing compared with Rod Liddle in the Spectator, who accused Harman of vacuous feminism, a reflex loathing of men and of being either "thick" or "criminally disingenuous". Liddle riffed about how he "wouldn't" with Harman, even after a few beers or, for that matter, with any other Labour woman, apart from Caroline Flint. There is even a website for Hatty-haters, harrietharmansucks.com. Well, call me a humourless harpy, but I'm not laughing.

According to Alexa.com, the Guardian's website is the 276th most popular website on the entire internet, so that link to harrietharmansucks.com should bring in some considerable traffic to the site.

**Celtic Druid** · 9th-August-2009

How can Harman's state-sponsored jihad against men be remotely construed as standing up for women?

Yeah, she's standing up all right, whilst she viciously tramples men's rights underfoot at every conceivable opportunity.

Good to see Angry Harry get a mention.

**haahoo** · 9th-August-2009

The guardian is nothing but a feminist bogroll..

**Feminist_Scum** · 13th-August-2009

Quote from haahoo

The guardian is nothing but a feminist bogroll..

Just like all newspapers then.

**haahoo** · 13th-August-2009

Quote from Feminist_Scum

Just like all newspapers then.

Pretty much, but the very name "the Gaurdian" suggests that they do consider themselves to be the Paper of the ruling class who know better than the rest of the infantilised tabloid sheet-shit readers..

It's Yes Prime Minister. second series Ep 4. "A Conflict of Interest"
http://www.jeffooi.com/2009/03/yes_p..._the_press.php

Hacker: Don't tell me about the press. I know exactly who reads the papers:

* The Daily Mirror is read by people who think they run the country;
* The Guardian is read by people who think they ought to run the country;
* The Times is read by the people who actually do run the country;
* The Daily Mail is read by the wives of the people who run the country;
* The Financial Times is read by people who own the country;
* The Morning Star is read by people who think the country ought to be run by another country;
* And The Daily Telegraph is read by people who think it is.

Sir Humphrey: Prime Minister, what about the people who read The Sun?

Bernard: Sun readers don't care who runs the country, as long as she's got big tits.

**johnkimble1** · 14th-August-2009

Quote from Feminist_Scum

Just like all newspapers then.

Sorry but this statement does a terrible disservice to the absolutely astounding collection of man haters the Guardian has assembled, both contributing to the paper and in particular blogging on their site.

No other paper or media outlet comes anywhere near the Guardian for misandry, it's no contest whatsoever. I'm not just talking about causal half arsed man haters either, just take a look at the site , there really are some quite evil and very disturbed people to be found writing there, all very much who clearly beleive all men are sick rapists etc (and that's on a good day!).

**Zuberi** · 14th-August-2009

Quote from Celtic Druid

How can Harman's state-sponsored jihad against men be remotely construed as standing up for women?

Yeah, she's standing up all right, whilst she viciously tramples men's rights underfoot at every conceivable opportunity.

Good to see Angry Harry get a mention.

You don't see it do you?

Harridan Harman is just doing what the serpent is telling her to do!
DIG HER OWN GRAVE!!!!!!!!!!!

**Celtic Druid** · 14th-August-2009

Quote from Zuberi

You don't see it do you?

Harridan Harman is just doing what the serpent is telling her to do!
DIG HER OWN GRAVE!!!!!!!!!!!

Great, she'll have lot's of volunteers to fill in that grave.

**CaptDMO** · 14th-August-2009

I don't get it...

Well, call me a humourless harpy, but I'm not laughing.

Um..OK, You're a humorless harpy then.

Kinda' like our Presidents recent astonishing gaffe about UPS, FedEx, and the Post Office.
Do these Guardian folks write for US Vice President Joe Biden as well?

**Zuberi** · 14th-August-2009

Quote from Celtic Druid

Great, she'll have lot's of volunteers to fill in that grave.

Damn straight!

**Percy** · 14th-August-2009

Good to see the MSM inadvertently encouraging our good work.

Well done Harry.

Publicity works, no matter who is doing the publicising.

The Guardian is too thick to realise that any mention of the MRM is useful to us.

I look forward to the day they publish the headline -

20 million British Rapists By-pass Harriet.
'Why aren't I getting any" says Deputy PM.

**Feminist_Scum** · 14th-August-2009

Quote from johnkimble1

Sorry but this statement does a terrible disservice to the absolutely astounding collection of man haters the Guardian has assembled, both contributing to the paper and in particular blogging on their site.

No other paper or media outlet comes anywhere near the Guardian for misandry, it's no contest whatsoever. I'm not just talking about causal half arsed man haters either, just take a look at the site , there really are some quite evil and very disturbed people to be found writing there, all very much who clearly beleive all men are sick rapists etc (and that's on a good day!).

It's all shit, just some of the piles stink more than others.

**Zuberi** · 14th-August-2009

Quote from johnkimble1

Sorry but this statement does a terrible disservice to the absolutely astounding collection of man haters the Guardian has assembled, both contributing to the paper and in particular blogging on their site.

No other paper or media outlet comes anywhere near the Guardian for misandry, it's no contest whatsoever. I'm not just talking about causal half arsed man haters either, just take a look at the site , there really are some quite evil and very disturbed people to be found writing there, all very much who clearly beleive all men are sick rapists etc (and that's on a good day!).

You shouldn't worry about garbage like them!

People like the ones you mentioned crawling around that site are raving psychotics who have no direction in life!
Its quite obvious, "misery needs company" that's why they contaminate that site with that much misandry.
They take pride in bashing mens' faces in because they have to feel better about their pathetic lives, some how!