Feminist writes stupid article claiming animals aren't Patriarchal

**Otis the Sweaty** · 20th-April-2009

The Feminist Agenda: In the Grip of a Patriarchal Picture

Here are select chunks from her shitty article:

Most people still believe that primates tend to form social groups comprised of one "alpha male"

and his "harem," who all mate with him exclusively and whom he dominates completely through physical force, right? That's the picture you were taught in 8th grade biology class. The thing is, this picture turns out to be completely inaccurate for almost all primates. Even in primates who do form social groups like this, the females are generally very promiscuous. They sneak off and mate with whatever males are lurking around all the time. In fact, recent DNA tests have shown that it's often less likely that an infant in the group will be the offspring of the alpha male than of a peripheral male. This is explained as an evolutionary strategy in which the female can increase the chances that a new male who manages to successfully challenge the "alpha" male will accept her child as his. If she's slept with all of them, then they're more likely to believe that the child is theirs.

Oh, so the females are total sluts. Just like human females. How does this disprove that the men are dominant?

So why did it take so many years for scientists to become aware of this whole range of female primate behavior?

For the same reason it took Dr. Jane Goodall over a decade to realize the the chimps she'd been observing daily were not gentle as they appeared, but were instead genocidal brutes; because the study of animals in the wild takes a long fucking time to paint a truly accurate picture.

A couple of things. Science has been a male-dominated field for a long time

Oh, yeah, ofcourse. That's us men all right, keeping women down by innacurately describing the mating patterns of primates. It really was a brilliant plan before chicks late Rachel in WY figured it out.

Thus the common pop mythology that men have a "biological imperative"

Not a myth. Totally obvious and easilly proven fact.

So as science has changed, and more women have entered the field, more of the female behavior has become visible. Of course, female scientists have also been socialized in a patriarchal culture, so much of their observation and interpretation of animal behavior will conform to the patriarchal picture as well.

It's true, there is no escape from the Patriarchy! We set this system up damn well.

This crap article comes from Rachel in WY, the biggest cunt who posts on Feministing, which is saying a lot. She says that her massive height (5'10!) allows her to physically intimidate men and that growing up, boys always found her attractive. I have seen a picture of her, she is not attractive at all and was deluded to feel that boys were into her in any large numbers.

**Incognito** · 20th-April-2009

It never ceases to amaze me how some masculists and feminists compare animals to humans in regard to human social structures and biological traits. Humans are not chimps, or any other sort of animal. Supposedly we have much greater intelligence. But sometimes I really do wonder...!

**Zuberi** · 20th-April-2009

Let me put it to you this way!!!

Animals and humans are not the same!
The person who wrote that article is a fucking clown!!!!

**TheOldOligarch** · 20th-April-2009

So this fool's entire point is that since the females sometimes manage to sneak out of their harems and mate with other males besides the alpha, that alpha males do not exist? Obviously the females will follow their own interests even when they are at odds with those of the dominant male in the group, so long as they can get away with it.

No one ever said that the alpha male was completely successful in securing all the females for himself, that he should fail at times (or even often) should not be a surprise. Also, nobody, as far as I am aware, claims that the alpha male dominates the females with his physical strength, he dominates and intimidates the other males with his physical strength.

You'll also notice defective female logic at work here:

''In fact, recent DNA tests have shown that it's often less likely that an infant in the group will be the offspring of the alpha male than of a peripheral male.''

An irrelevant comparison. It is not whether the alpha male is more likely to be the father than all the other beta males combined that is important, but whether he is more likely to be the father than any one of the beta males, which is obviously the case. If the alpha male is fathering 20% of the young in a social group containing 10 males then he is still doing the best out of the bunch.

**dad_savage** · 21st-April-2009

She says that her massive height (5'10!) allows her to physically intimidate men.

So the fact that she stands roughly equal the average male height for a white man allows her to intimidate men? I'm sorry but I would have assumed you'd need to be taller than average to be seen as intimidating. Maybe she wears high-heels to give herself a few extra inches, ahh, but then she'll have fallen into our vicious patriarchal trap, since we all know why men make women wear those oppressive foot-shackles.

Score one for the patriarchy.

**Zuberi** · 21st-April-2009

Quote from dad_savage

So the fact that she stands roughly equal the average male height for a white man allows her to intimidate men? I'm sorry but I would have assumed you'd need to be taller than average to be seen as intimidating. Maybe she wears high-heels to give herself a few extra inches, ahh, but then she'll have fallen into our vicious patriarchal trap, since we all know why men make women wear those oppressive foot-shackles.

Score one for the patriarchy.

I don't think any woman who's 5ft10in can physically intimidate the average man. Me myself, I happen to be 6ft3in 275lbs I seriously doubt that I would be physically intimidated by a 5ft10in women! Maybe a mangina would be intimidated by a females' below average height.

**Jack** · 21st-April-2009

Quote from Otis the Sweaty

She says that her massive height (5'10!) allows her to physically intimidate men and that growing up

A legend in her own mind, but likely just a bitch people steered away from in reality

**Kim** · 21st-April-2009

Quote from dad_savage

So the fact that she stands roughly equal the average male height for a white man allows her to intimidate men? I'm sorry but I would have assumed you'd need to be taller than average to be seen as intimidating. Maybe she wears high-heels to give herself a few extra inches, ahh, but then she'll have fallen into our vicious patriarchal trap, since we all know why men make women wear those oppressive foot-shackles.

Score one for the patriarchy.

**Timocrat** · 21st-April-2009

I'm 6' 4" and weight-lift several times a week. Sorry deary your height don't do it for me, if that was even that important.

Pitbulls are middle to small sized dogs and can whoop ass on any other dog or wolf on the face of the earth, and that includes that breeds females. Size can help, but only means more in the effete world of women. Women like basketball players, but they always lost fights to the wrestling team on every occasion I saw them match up. The indirect world of women is more presentation, and so men that look impressive to female eyes, like Peacocks, are tough. In the effete world paper tigers are queen.

Only paper he looks rich, is tall and has weaker and effete boy toy features and is a winner in the girls' world. Yet often such men spend all their wealth on their looks, have coasted on their looks and not worked the brain, and never had to fight because all the manginas were afraid of the tall guy.

3- strikes you are out of luck, when you go by feamle instincts in judging men. Maybe a man who saves his money by not blowing it on the outisde and on women who demand he do to impress them is the one who has money. Just a thought.

Maybe the man that is shorter, has practiced and fought in some fighting arts is a better protector and scares others who know strength by body shape better.

I'm always amazed that women who have been shelter pretty much all their lives, outside of sex and gossip, feel wise enough to tell men how it really is. Fubar! It's like me telling a women another women can give birth better than her because of my crystal ball says so.

Such women are paper-tigers as well!

**RebelliousVanilla** · 21st-April-2009

Lion females on the other hand... Mate with tons. lol

**Otis the Sweaty** · 21st-April-2009

Quote from dad_savage

So the fact that she stands roughly equal the average male height for a white man allows her to intimidate men?

yes

I'm sorry but I would have assumed you'd need to be taller than average to be seen as intimidating.

That's just the Patriarchy talking

**Otis the Sweaty** · 21st-April-2009

Quote from Timocrat

I'm 6' 4" and weight-lift several times a week. Sorry deary your height don't do it for me, if that was even that important

women believe that height=strength and fighting ability. They are very stupid.

**Percy** · 21st-April-2009

I'm always amazed that women who have been shelter pretty much all their lives, outside of sex and gossip, feel wise enough to tell men how it really is. Fubar! It's like me telling a women another women can give birth better than her because of my crystal ball says so.

hahahaha! Good one, Timo.

Humans, female and male, are an opinionated lot.