The Vulnerabilities of Girls - Community

let me refute some especially gay parts:

Yes, females of our species are not as strong, pound for pound, as males, but other than that, seriously, what is the difference?

There are no comments yet for this article, but you just know that the bitch is going to get flamed for this line. Here are some predictable responses I expect:

1. "I am stronger than most guys I know"
2. "Women actually are as strong as men pound for pound, it's just that men are bigger"
3. "Men are stronger because society encourages them to be active and eat more"
4. "Women are as strong as men pound for pound of lean muscle mass. Mens muscles are no stronger than women's muscles"

In fact, let's do an over under: Will the Femiwhores who respond to this particular cunt bring up 3 or more of the items on my list or will they only bring up 2 or less?

Let me illustrate using two powerful animals as examples: The American Black Bear and the Cougar. The bear is twice as heavy and almost three times as strong, and despite its bulky appearance, surprisingly fast and agile. But when confronted, cougars (even females!) have been known to severely injure and even kill black bears to protect themselves, their territory, their kills, or their cubs. Sometimes they even start the fight. Just because cougars are not as strong as bears does not mean they pose no threat to bears.

Horiffically stupid comparison. Cougars are killing machines with claws and razor sharp teeth. Women have long finger nails and sharp tongues, hardly comparable.

Statistics notwithstanding; I'm talking biological differences, here. There is almost nothing so physically or mentally different between young/tweeny girls and boys that makes one more able to protect themselves (or make more reasonable decisions) than the other side.

I would say statistics are a pretty big deal when assessing risks, you dumb whore. And boys are told to be cautious too, but there are more predators looking for young girls.

Every game, book, movie, or song I've ever come across that claims to be about "what it means" to grow up female and "what it takes" to "become a woman" strikes me as just another artistic/commercial reflection of a mentality whose sole purpose is to reinforce the "second-rate human" status quo: you're a girl, so there are special dangers for you; males are out to molest you, better watch out; but better watch those pounds, or no one will want anything to do with you when you're actually looking for a mate. Conversely, vilifying men is just as damaging; kids so often grow up to be what they're told they are.

This sounds a lot like MRA speak, which is why MRA's drive me up the wall. They frequently don't realize how Feminists their complaints are which makes me sometimes wonder if they are in the right movement.

There are special dangers for girls/women coming from men. That's reality. Fuck anyone who seeks to deny that, be they MRA or Feminist. We are not equal.

Now, before anyone starts in with "but it does apply to a lot of women! You're just an exception." --No. No, I am not. Estrogen-saturated though my body may be, my brain is basically the same as everyone else's

False, men and women's brains are significantly different.

The conviction that a nerdy, video game-loving, technologically oriented, good looking woman,

Have to stop you there, you are not good looking. I can say that without having ever seen you.

who likes jet fighters,

Jet fighers? What about rocket ships? Do you like those too? What are, fucking 10?

computers, fart jokes

Oh wow, you like fart jokes, you are so cool. There is nothing less funny than a fart joke but you are so dumb and want to be a man so bad that you can't see that.

and big explosions, who is not and never has been a victim of violence, who can and has successfully defended herself from larger aggressors

So you have or have not been a victim of violence? Which is it. And no, you cannot defend yourself from larger aggressors.

--that someone like that is an exception, or unusual, or necessarily lesbian, is a prime example of the kind of stupidity I'm talking about.

Truth=Stupidity. Got it.

There is no reason for girls or women who aren't vulnerable, technologically ignorant, or passive to be seen as a deviation from the human norm

Yes there is.

I've been e-lynched for saying this before, but I seriously would not be surprised if it turned out that many rapes came about in part because the girl or woman felt powerless to even attempt to defend herself.

No.

We tell women not to fight back

Who tells them that?

We live in passive fear of the other half while men are less likely to feel intimidated by the idea of engaging a woman in physical conflict because they've been told all their lives we can't fight them

False, men have been told all there lives by the media and by culture that women can fight and beat them. Men just know that it is bullshit. Women, however, are not quite intelligent enough to see through the propaganda.

Now she is talking about what if you were a different sex

Here is the part that maybe you didn't know: Pretty much everything that makes you who you are would stay the same.

Uhm... I would think that your sex is a fairly big part of who you are. If you were a man and became a woman you would in fact become vastly weaker, vastly smaller, slower, more moody and somewhat dumber. Those a pretty huge differences all by themselves.

Screw this fallacy of feminine fragility and unchallengable masculinity: If women were less afraid to fight and to think, they'd be harder to victimize, and if men were better educated, they'd respect the injury women could potentially inflict on them in spite of lesser muscle mass, so even the jerks among them would think twice about picking fights

Okay, so men who victimize women do so because they don't know the true nature of girl power. Uh huh.