According to the author of the
Anti-Porn Feminists blog, 'triple anal' is supposedly commonplace in mainstream pornography.
By 'triple anal', I think she means a woman being anally penetrated simultaneously by three men (assuming such an act is even physically possible?).
In her most recent
blog entry, she mentions 'triple anal' twice:
Quote:
|
Every sexual image you see in pornography has to happen, for real, to a real woman, whether it’s a woman being subjected to a triple anal, or being penetrated by ten men in a row then thrown in a dumpster in an alley, or being penetrated while having her head flushed down the toilet.
|
Quote:
|
With pornography, the risk, the violence, the damage, is not an unintended consequence of the work, it is the work. A woman is not subjected to a triple anal without condoms by accident, because there was a temporary slip in h&s standards, she is subjected to it because it is the work.
|
The author is staunchly opposed to pornography, and yet her knowledge of mainstream pornographic content is clearly woeful.
Either that, or she is promoting this myth purely for propaganda purposes.