It is not merely wish and ideology, however, that lead feminist science to such muddled thought; there is a tradition, embodied in semiotics, hermeneutics, and certain forms of phenomenology that feminist science is reflecting (or perverting, depending on one's assessment of the tradition). This tradition tends to deny that there is such a thing as truth and to see perceived truths as merely shared cultural meanings that could, with proper redefinition, be converted to their opposites. It tends to deny underlying realities that set limits on what may be perceived as truth.

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...43/ai_11597161