When/Why don't women speak/extenuate their selfish minds?

Oh my "uppity males" - they must be put down!

This uppityiness has no place in the selfish-cunterations of their gynocentric socially extracted contrived expectation.

A man with an opinion, why that's just not allowed in this selfish ideologically driven festering panderance to a cuntoid perspective that so gynocentrically prevails society!

Hmm, how does a social beginning best exemplify a expandance of what is "deemed" socially right?

Robert Rebadow (LG), great to "see" you're back!

You've been missed brother!

It is refreshing to get away from the mainstream and hear real questions from real people, though I fear censorship may not be far away

I guess Rush Limbaugh deserves credit for fighting against the politically correct media through radio, which set an example for the internet (I don't know the situation outside N America) - and homeschoolers are providing an alternative to state-run education, though not every family can do this

AOL/Warner-owned TIME Magazine has nothing to say on misandry in popular culture. It even had an article on work-colleague nuisances, which centred on the male-specific terms "jerks" and "No Asshole Rule".. Is it likely that we would hear a the female-specific term "bitch" in such a context?

It will take any opportunity it has to print sugar-coated, reality-denying PC-speak on "issues of gender". Take this Letter to the Editor on the Don Imus storm in a teacup:

As a black woman, I am bothered that Imus went too far, that he's been allowed to spew his garbage virtually unchecked for decades, that the Rev. Jesse Jackson and Sharpton are hypocrites and that too much hip-hop degrades women. But I am even more disgusted that Imus' defenders try to trivialize his remarks by citing his charity work. Philanthropy is not a license to discriminate or to disrespect me, my race or my gender.

Renee Newbold, NEWPORT NEWS, VA.

The funny thing is not the idiocy and hyopcracy argument, but that the US mainstream media is so filling to print such "garbage" without any attempt of a counter-balance or counter-argument.

I am aware that the days of being able to freely surf and post on the internet, if that was ever truly the case, may be limited in the future..

I know of many folk who have been banned for mere words..

and hosts that bend to the authorities..

There is not really the freedom on the net that we like to think..

Quote from Robert Rebadow

...unlike the mainstream media it actually allows dissenting opinions to be heard, it seems;



Look at this. A few comments on the internet (!!!) that called her heroines "twits" and "opportunistic idiots" and she and her ilk already feel oh so threatened by this "menacing tide against women who speak their minds", this "vitriol" these "shifting sands".

Shows how used they are to having total control and dominance over anything that gets published.

Internet is the only and therefore also the biggest threat to them, because they can not totally control it (yet).

The "shifting sands" comment is recognition that the men's movement is gathering steam and is unstoppable. They have only themselves to thank for the poison they have been spreading for decades....

It's payback time and the bitches already know what's coming...

And it's not going to be pretty...