By that logic, I could be an abuser just from passing gas!!

lol, those aren't signs of an abuser. Some are signs of insecurity though.

Quote from RebelliousVanilla

lol, those aren't signs of an abuser. Some are signs of insecurity though.

lol...i know ,but by them it's the signs of an abuser

Quote from TheOne

lol...i know ,but by them it's the signs of an abuser

Remember, good people, that the term "abuse" has now been redefined to mean anything that doesn't fit in with the whims, prejudices and entitlements of the superior sex. Hence any man that does not pander to such whims, prejudices and entitlements is by definition an abuser...

The "abuse industry" has a ravenous appetite, and even as engorged as it is, it's expansionist ambitions requires it's key target, white hetrosexual males, to be 'exclusively' subject to paranoic and discriminatory definitions as to what constitutes "abuse" in order to placate it's oversubscribed base of hysterical female members, and an army of soulless leeches feeding off the male carnage.

I've got a warning sign for you!!

If you pretend that you've been oppressed for all eternity in order to beat the system, you are an abuser!

Spilling his guts to you right away

me

Calls an ex-girlfriend "crazy" or "a bitch" ,Says he hasn‘t been with a woman in a long time and you are the first he has been interested in

me

Still lives with his mother at an inappropriate age

me

and she seems controlling

me

Laughs at things not appropriate to laugh about

me

Changes moods easily

me



Well that's 7, so I guess I'm a likely abuser. Cool.

Ha!

I meet a good third of those, apparently I should be some kind of maniacal berserker, foaming at the mouth as I rend my girlfriend limb from bloody limb then.

All of the mentioned attributes are just as applicable to women as they are to men. An abusive personality is not gender specific!!!!

Yes a lack of appreciation for interpersonal boundaries is a big red flag. If someone is looking though your mail then that is not good. Also wanting to convince you that they have never felt this way about any body else before is a big one too. Abusers always use bate to get the kind of victim they want: someone who is either emotionally dependent by nature or happens to be in a vulnerable state. They want someone that they can abuse with impunity.
Women are just as apt to do these things as men are but the public debate on abusive people is dominated by feminists and women. This needs to change.

if there is no abuser then there is not a victim

but all wimyn are victims of the patriarchy and have been for the last
10 000 years

therefore al men are abusers

ok that is chop logic but equal to the best from the wimyns' black arm brigade who mourn the non possession of all the good things out there but not supplied by selfish men -

equal wages for unequal output, free child care, free UHC,
those remunerative executive positions men attain and have heart attacks by doing so - these should be automatically bequeathed after a wimyns' studies degree, men doing the dishes vacuuming and laundry and hanging the issue out and to ad nauseum

*Checks* yeah, looks like that list has just about every personality trait/eventuality covered; looks like we're all abusers, guys. But then, we knew that already, right?!

Come to think of it, that list reminds me of the 'most rape victims know their attackers' malarkey that feminists spout. Whilst I can't say with 100% certainty that this is not true, it sounds like utter bullshit, it really does; why on Earth would a guy risk raping someone he knows, given the higher likelihood of being caught? It's just the usual rubbish designed to make women fear as many men around them as possible.

That is, after all, feminism's number one goal: to destroy relationships between men and women. It's a sad world, it really is.