Double Standards: False rape accusers

**FalseRapeArchivist** · 2nd-July-2008

http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com...alse-rape.html -- News alert: Joresa Diondra Jefferson, the false rape accuser whose lie touched off a manhunt across the Portland area and led to a "person of interest" submitting to a DNA test, is still on vacation, visiting relatives.

Did you get that? Do you think that a suspected rapist would be permitted to finish out his vacation before he is charged? The question scarcely survives its statement. But so what else is new? Double standards abound in the area of rape and false accusations.

Depending on the jurisdiction, rape can carry a life sentence. In contrast, false rape accusers, who are able to put innocent men away for life or at least decades (if the lies have their intended effect) typically are only subject to a maximimum sentence of six months to two years, depending on the jurisdiction -- if they are charged at all (and they often are not charged at all). Think about that: she can put an innocent man away for 30 years, but the most she can get is two years. Exactly how does that punishment fit the crime? There is a gross absence of proportionality in the sentencing statutes.

Moreover, while many U.S. states are extending and even abolishing statutes of limitations for rape, false reports are often subject to a limited statute of limitations that will bar most claims if the lie was sufficiently effective to send a man to prison. If a man serves -- for instance -- 10 years for a rape he didn't commit due to a woman's lie, it is only because the lie had its intended effect. If the lie is only then finally discovered, society should not excuse the liar from prosecution on the basis that the statute of limitations has run out. That only rewards her for being a good liar. The goal should be to punish especially the good liars, should it not? Thus, the statutes of limitaiton should start to run only after the lie is revealed.

And then there is the issue of anonymity. When will we, as a society, realize that there is something terribly wrong with a culture that allows virtually any female to claim she's been raped and, before a single fact has been adjudicated, cause a male's life to unravel for the world to see? She, of course, retains her anonymity while his humiliation and the complete destruction of his reputation often is a national news story. Even if the claim is found to be a lie, it is impossible to "put the toothpaste back in the tube," and he will never regain the reputation he lost. For what other crime do we hand one class of private citizens (generally young women) the unbridled power to destroy the lives of any member of another class of citizens (e.g., virtually any male, but generally young men)?

These double standards are merely manifestations of the fact that the crime of making a false rape report has become so embroiled in the feminist sexual assault milieu that it has been largely, and improperly, removed from the public discourse about rape and subsumed in a mishmash of policies that seek only to protect female and child rape victims. Men and boys falsely accused of rape are nothing more than collateral damage in the war on rape. My Web site is devoted to the false rape epidemic: http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/

**RedRooster** · 2nd-July-2008

An excellent blog, Sir!

The links above are improperly formated, anyone have the ability to edit these?

Should be: http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/

**Marx** · 2nd-July-2008

Quote from RedRooster

The links above are improperly formated, anyone have the ability to edit these?

Well spotted, and amended.

To second RR's comment, that is indeed excellent. Great stuff.

**FalseRapeArchivist** · 3rd-July-2008

Thanks, gentlemen. Means a lot coming from you.

**byslexic_danana** · 3rd-July-2008

Any woman found to have made a false accusation, should be imprisoned for a similar amount of time to how long the man would have been, had he found guilty; she was prepared to see an innocent man be imprisoned for years, so let the punishment fit the crime.

But because men obviously don't have feelings, the only crime in the eyes of many, when it comes to such women, is that such false allegations are disrespectful towards genuine rape victims; anything to make women seem the victim, and to ignore men's feelings.

**Dylan MacVillain** · 3rd-July-2008

Great blog and excellent quote, FRA:

The Judge’s reaction is typical: Although false reporting of rape is a crime whose victims are almost exclusively male, it has become so embroiled in the feminist sexual assault milieu that discussing it as a potentially significant problem for men is verboten because such view does not conform to the feminist rape metanarrative.

In fact, this crime may be unique among all crimes because virtually the entire public discourse about it is dominated by persons who insist it is not a serious public threat. At least not to men. If it is a threat at all, it’s to women, they insist.

As I and many others have said repeatedly, false rape accusers, in addition to getting a rapists prison sentense, should be forced to register as a sex offender everywhere they move to.

**Percy** · 3rd-July-2008

As I and many others have said repeatedly, false rape accusers, in addition to getting a rapists prison sentense, should be forced to register as a sex offender everywhere they move to.

First part would be difficult except in cases where a falsely accused man has recieved a sentence. Those that have been exonerated at trial don't have a sentence. The False accuser should still be jailed for a time, but no one has come up with a Just time.

What do you suggest, AKUUS?

The second part - sex offenders list - I agree.

**Ledburian** · 6th-July-2008

This refers to the Double Standards thing.....

From one of yesterday's UK newspapers 05/07/08:

SPARED JAIL, THE MODEL WHO TRIED TO TURN THE CLOCK BACK....

A vain model who lied about her age in an attempt to make it big in Hollywood almost (note that bit, guys...almost!) ended up in jail after she went to extreme lengths to hide the truth.

Sakia Porter, 36, had received an offer of a modelling job in the united States. Convinced she would have to pretend to be in her late twenties, she forged her birth certificate, changing the date from 1971 to 1979.

She used it to get a replacement UK Passport after telling the authorities the old one had been eaten by her dog!

Then she sent her new passport to the US Embassy with a visa application, Southwark Crown Court in London was told.

However, Porter had not reckoned on the American authorities checking out her details. They checked her new passport against their records which showed she not only travelled to the US in the past but that her date of birth had been eight years earlier. They promptly alerted the UK Passport Office in Glasgow. Porter was called for an interview in London, police were called and she was arrested.

The Court was told that she was desperate for this modelling job in America and that no issues regarding to terrorism were involved in the case, neither were illegal immigration or cross border crimes. She was solely prompted by a desire for employment in modelling in the US.

Porter pleaded guilty to making an untrue statement in order to obtain a UK Passport and possessing false ID documents.

She was sentenced to nine months in prison suspended for a year and ordered to pay £350 prosecution costs.

The Judge said it was a "serious matter" that carries an immediate and automatic jail term but in this case there were exceptional circumstances. He said (now get this!): "It is a woman's privilege not to tell the exact truth about her age, but that does not normally apply when you are completing details for a new passport. A case such as this would normally attract immediate imprisonment, but in the case of this LADY it was motivated by nothing more than vanity rather than for any nefarious reason........."

So she was released with no incarceration at all - just a wee bit of a hole in either her purse or some poor sap of a bloke's wallet, more than likely.

Would a bloke have got away with a vanity cop out? As if.........

PS: The article included a very seductive and alluring looking pic of this woman...no doubt the defence counsel made sure it was shown to this muppet of a Judge - who was, of course, male.

**khankrumthebulgar** · 7th-July-2008

A month ago I met Mark in Dallas. Mark was a Subprime Mortgage Banker, and formerly spent 8 years with Bank One prior to its merger with Chase Bank. He had been through two marriages and Divorces. And is now a confirmed Bachelor. He told me about his last debacle. He met five years after his Second Divorce a younger Trophy Girl friend. She was incredibly beautiful and a wild Animal in the sheets. She to put it blunt, had his hid spinning. But she was as unstable and crazy, without any impulse control as she was a stunner.

She drank like a Sailor, flirted with other Men, swore like an Iron Worker. In short she has some self control issues. They tried to make a long term relationship out of a fling. She moved in with Mark. But soon demanded insane levels of spending, a huge diamond etc. He came to his senses. And told her it would not work out. So they split up. He thought like adults and in a reasonable manner. He asked his Mother to house sit his house. And he left on a Business Trip. He was arrested upon his return for Rape, and Domestic Abuse.

He spent upwards of $100,000 on his defense. At the Retrial she finally stated she had lied about the Rape and Domestic Abuse. She just wanted to get even. For his breaking up with her. She also got his hostile Second Wife to come and testify against him. A little icing on the Cake so to speak. He has not dated in three years.

This is the second such story I have heard like this. Nothing happened legally to his ex Girlfriend. Nothing.

**Dylan MacVillain** · 7th-July-2008

Quote from khankrumthebulgar

A month ago I met Mark in Dallas. Mark was a Subprime Mortgage Banker, and formerly spent 8 years with Bank One prior to its merger with Chase Bank. He had been through two marriages and Divorces. And is now a confirmed Bachelor. He told me about his last debacle. He met five years after his Second Divorce a younger Trophy Girl friend. She was incredibly beautiful and a wild Animal in the sheets. She to put it blunt, had his hid spinning. But she was as unstable and crazy, without any impulse control as she was a stunner.

She drank like a Sailor, flirted with other Men, swore like an Iron Worker. In short she has some self control issues. They tried to make a long term relationship out of a fling. She moved in with Mark. But soon demanded insane levels of spending, a huge diamond etc. He came to his senses. And told her it would not work out. So they split up. He thought like adults and in a reasonable manner. He asked his Mother to house sit his house. And he left on a Business Trip. He was arrested upon his return for Rape, and Domestic Abuse.

He spent upwards of $100,000 on his defense. At the Retrial she finally stated she had lied about the Rape and Domestic Abuse. She just wanted to get even. For his breaking up with her. She also got his hostile Second Wife to come and testify against him. A little icing on the Cake so to speak. He has not dated in three years.

This is the second such story I have heard like this. Nothing happened legally to his ex Girlfriend. Nothing.

What an adolescent little tart! The whore should have to pay for his legal defense. It should be mandated by law that anyone found to have lied about you leading to your going to trial should have to pay all of your legal defenses plus punitive damages.

**lolintertubes** · 7th-July-2008

Quote from Percy

First part would be difficult except in cases where a falsely accused man has recieved a sentence. Those that have been exonerated at trial don't have a sentence. The False accuser should still be jailed for a time, but no one has come up with a Just time.

What do you suggest, AKUUS?

The second part - sex offenders list - I agree.

What about a false accusers list? Same terms as the sex offenders one but at least then people would know what their crime was.

**lolintertubes** · 7th-July-2008

Quote from Ledburian

This refers to the Double Standards thing.....

From one of yesterday's UK newspapers 05/07/08:

SPARED JAIL, THE MODEL WHO TRIED TO TURN THE CLOCK BACK....

A vain model who lied about her age in an attempt to make it big in Hollywood almost (note that bit, guys...almost!) ended up in jail after she went to extreme lengths to hide the truth.

Sakia Porter, 36, had received an offer of a modelling job in the united States. Convinced she would have to pretend to be in her late twenties, she forged her birth certificate, changing the date from 1971 to 1979.

She used it to get a replacement UK Passport after telling the authorities the old one had been eaten by her dog!

Then she sent her new passport to the US Embassy with a visa application, Southwark Crown Court in London was told.

However, Porter had not reckoned on the American authorities checking out her details. They checked her new passport against their records which showed she not only travelled to the US in the past but that her date of birth had been eight years earlier. They promptly alerted the UK Passport Office in Glasgow. Porter was called for an interview in London, police were called and she was arrested.

The Court was told that she was desperate for this modelling job in America and that no issues regarding to terrorism were involved in the case, neither were illegal immigration or cross border crimes. She was solely prompted by a desire for employment in modelling in the US.

Porter pleaded guilty to making an untrue statement in order to obtain a UK Passport and possessing false ID documents.

She was sentenced to nine months in prison suspended for a year and ordered to pay £350 prosecution costs.

The Judge said it was a "serious matter" that carries an immediate and automatic jail term but in this case there were exceptional circumstances. He said (now get this!): "It is a woman's privilege not to tell the exact truth about her age, but that does not normally apply when you are completing details for a new passport. A case such as this would normally attract immediate imprisonment, but in the case of this LADY it was motivated by nothing more than vanity rather than for any nefarious reason........."

So she was released with no incarceration at all - just a wee bit of a hole in either her purse or some poor sap of a bloke's wallet, more than likely.

Would a bloke have got away with a vanity cop out? As if.........

PS: The article included a very seductive and alluring looking pic of this woman...no doubt the defence counsel made sure it was shown to this muppet of a Judge - who was, of course, male.

I saw this in the daily record. I wasn't the least bit surprised that she got off. If it was a male he would of been banged up and accused of terrorism quick as you could blink.

**Ledburian** · 8th-July-2008

I really think that it's now time for an official announcement to be issued to make an obvious situation totally and absolutely and officially clear on the following lines:

There is one rule of law and consequent punishment for men

and

There is one rule of law and consequent non-punishment for women

I don't know why they don't publish this declaration, because sure as eggs is eggs and snow is white that's what the Status Quo is in (not so) Great Britain.

**Feckless** · 8th-July-2008

Quote from Ledburian

I really think that it's now time for an official announcement to be issued to make an obvious situation totally and absolutely and officially clear on the following lines:

There is one rule of law and consequent punishment for men

and

There is one rule of law and consequent non-punishment for women

I don't know why they don't publish this declaration, because sure as eggs is eggs and snow is white that's what the Status Quo is in (not so) Great Britain.

Not only in GB. On a German blog a judge said when he punishes femalse he thinks about what a male would get and then lowers the punishment a bit. He called that the women bonus and is officially saying that. A lot of colleages do it the same way he admited. Makes you sick. (In Germany there is no jury. The judge (or sometimes judges) alone decides what to do)

**Ledburian** · 9th-July-2008

Quote from Feckless

On a German blog a judge said when he punishes females he thinks about what a male would get and then lowers the punishment a bit. He called that the women bonus.... A lot of colleages do it the same way he admited......

Well, I wish these manginas would explain, in plain and simple language, EXACTLY what they mean by the "women bonus"? How is it truly justified in days of so-called equal rights, equal opportunities and (ha!...now this is the funny one!) - EQUAL TREATMENT!

Does it really mean that the possssion of a vagina and a pair of over developed mammaries a guaranteed passport to leniency and an easy ride? Or the possession of a todger and an over-developed Adam's apple a guaranteed passport to harsher sentencing and a rougher ride, even when the male offences are less serious? That's how it is right now, if all the judgments we see on a regular basis are any sort of guideline!

I wish these so called fair and equitable (ha! what a joke!) (in)judicial scroats sitting up there on their high court/crown court/magisterial court benches would furnish us with full details for the reasons for all the discrepancies in the sentencing and punishments they enforce which are so obviously based on gender.

How can this situation be justified when practically every day we hear feminists for ever bleating and squealing like stuck pigs about the female fight for total and absolute equal treatment in all aspects of life. Oh, silly me - if it's males getting all the $hit thrown at them then that's justifiable treatment! Of course it is......silly me.