Quote from Yan Yan

I fear, CD, that the point of my anecdote is totally lost.

You saw it as a anecdote, i'd insist an antidote, a remedy neutralizing/counteracting the poison of politically correct assimilation.

Quote from Yan Yan

Surely it's far better to discuss why men. the inventors and providers that feed the ever-gaping maw of worldwide feminism, see up/down toilets seats as a major issue

We don't, but women do - extensively, and religiously!

For women, securing something as seemingly insignificant as "rights" regarding something as petty as 'toilet seat politics' transcends a power dynamic which will dominate the proceedings for the rest of their life regarding relationships with men, and how they 'control' them!

Why should men resist a gynocentric indoctrination procedure, and see it as a major issue?

Silly men resisting any gynocentric theme!

Quote from Yan Yan

Perhaps the purpose of these insular debates is to forget about how real people all over the world live their lives. The victims of wars in the Middle East and the starving millions in Africa need to be reminded that we have more important things to think about - like whether the toilet seat is up or down?

Nice brother. As much as I'd like to wave a magic wand and make starvation a myth, we're stuck with the reality.

Only so many miracles can be performed on one day brother (it's the law!).

I do as best I can "morally" to better others around the world. However, I'm only one man.

The purpose of the site is primarily 'mens rights.'

"The betterment of Brothers, and sisters worldwide is a righteous concern."

However, we can only do so much. To ensure a modicum of success is to specialize, ie: mens rights.

We can't fight all the wrongs at once, and expect to win.

Thereby embracing moral "worldwide" introspection dilutes our conviction, and in turn our cause.

The advert in question is one of a series, all of which portray home life and male-female relationships as conflict-ridden. In every one of the adverts shown thus far the man is beaten into submission by a woman. The latest has a woman in her late fifties or early sixties berating her husband.

[ame="http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-2397956778187101996"]MFI 'Toilet Seat' TV advert[/ame]

Quote from Ted Bundy

In every one of the adverts shown thus far the man is beaten into submission by a woman.

This is a 'marketing ploy' which panders to the "innate" spite of women who represent the majority of consumerist spenders. Advertising agencies understand this implicitly.

Male-bashing adverts aren't necessarily misandrist. It's just business, that is, it's just appealing to womens spiteful, vindictive and nasty "inherent" nature, and in turn profit is accrued.

Most women, more so than men, are sheep. Their easily 'herded' into an idea, and expansions beyond that (ideology). The majority of adverts are directed towards the most gullible, and the most influential consumerist spenders = women. It's just business primarily!

Although, the reality of a gender 'power dynamic' remains within the absurdity of 'toilet-seat politics.'

Quote from Celtic Druid

You saw it as a anecdote, i'd insist an anitidote, a remedy neutralizing/counteracting the poison of politically correct assimilation.

Aaahh!! So you did mean 'antidote'. Good point CD

Originally Posted by Celtic Druid
You saw it as a anecdote, i'd insist an anitidote, a remedy neutralizing/counteracting the poison of politically correct assimilation.

YanYan replied:

Aaahh!! So you did mean 'antidote'. Good point CD

Damn!! I hate making spelling mistakes. Aggrrhh!

You 'blaggard' (old English) YanYan.