No need to explain women worship, it is feminism in action with some chivalry mixed in.

However, some might wonder what I mean by child worship.

I mean this idea that children should always come first and the constant use of the "it's for the children" card anytime someone wants to justify an injustice.

Both are bad for society but is one worse than the other long term?

I voted woman worship as worse, because children cannot be held accountable for adult decisions made on their behalf. Whereas woman worship depends on the woman in question taking advantage of being treated like a child, despite being an adult. She should be accountable for her actions and decisions, but chooses to deny herself that right.

I voted child worship BECAUSE a child cannot be held accountable.

You see, that lack of accountability means that there is no limit to how bad, bad can get.

Children are scapegoats for everything political and it has gotten way out of hand.

Why should a child come first in a custody hearing? There are a min of 3 people involved and all 3 should have rights. We see how the children have been used against men. Perhaps if we were as nasty as the feminists we could use them to our advantage but that just isn't our style nor should it be.

Finally, this child worship turns out bad kids. "It's all about U" is a slogan used in schools and is entirely sending an entitlement message to children which they are too young to fully appreciate the effects of. Child worship also refers to the "helicopter parenting" style that has become so commonplace. Parents give children no freedom or independance and parents act as if a bored child means they have failed as a parent.

You've seen these kids in public who act like terrors, they practically CONTROL the parents and as adults, where will they end up?

You have some valid points, and of course, those 'all about me' children grow up into adults, and the women have already been indoctrinated in the art of 'all about me', while the men have indoctrination changed as they grow... It starts off all about them, by the time they're in 3rd year of school, they've been taught about gays and how women are superior.

Right and since spolied women of today are unlikely to change, we might start looking to prevent the next generation from becoming like them.

I look at it this way.....

There's nothing wrong with placing great importance upon the interests of children. The problem is, nobody seems to have the slightest clue as to what the best interests of children really are.

To begin with, any state involvement in their lives is not in their "best interests". A child's best interests are to be raised in an unspoiled environment by BOTH his/her parents and taught accountability and values of real worth.

Parents (mothers in particularly) mess things up all the time by thinking they should neglect their marriage and spouse in exchange for the child's best interests when, in fact, putting their spouse and marriage at the forefront of their priorities would be the very best thing they could do for their child. Generally, if mom and dad are happy and love each other, the children are going to be happy and feel loved.

True Kim, this "the children always come first" attitude does put a major strain on marriage. You are right, parents should enrich their marriage/relationship to provide the best environment for the child and that means putting the child second. Parents should have a united front because children know how to play parents against one another. Children thrive when there is no confusion about what is expect of them and a united front helps alot in that area.

The schools also seem to use the children against parents. Do you spank your child? Be careful that the school doesn't find out, they might report you for child abuse. They push "call 911" on kids and sometimes kids use 911 against parents. This pits kids against parent and don't even get me started on a child coming home telling a parent how they am bad because they smoke!

With the goddess Cybele, and others worshiping of women, it is always first led by the goddess and then followed by worship of children in their wake. It is the same now in our present western culture, as women's "affection beneath" means more to her and her sisters than that towards institutions, laws, codes, ideas of mortality and more . The need to have children around the goddess becomes very important like a politican kissing babies. Youthful young women give her power, and young men get mistreated as they represent threats to her power as they move from "affection beneath" to wanting to break away from her power. Goddess Cybele demanded her husabnd and son deball themselves physically (which lead to all males who followed her doing so, which were called her Galli)

Such leadership of goddesses are always marked by covert actions leading the fall of the society in the long run.

For details: http://www.honornetwork.com/Roots_Of_Medusa.html

Ouch, are you saying we are on the path of de-balling all men?

Yes, it is true that the child worship came from the female worship. Will stopping the female worship stop the child worship though or are we too far in?

Unlikely, as you can see when one surrounds oneself with children and one says: you are for the children and all your actions are for the children, that it becomes very hard to dislodge the worship of the goddess for you must attack the use of children as pawns. You will be put up as a hater of children. Most will jump off that ship as many manginas jump off the idea that to give men more balanced rights you must take away some from women. The only way for this to end is an outside threat that burns Rome, or a inside one that is likely to seriously upset the cart. Half measures will never do, as the establishment will copy any moderate organization and place their head with more cash to control the change to half measures, thus weakening the movement.

Fox leadership takes it methods from covert goddess ways. Cybele didn't de-ball her husband and son herself, she got them to prove their love for her by getting them to do it for themselves, or got her Galli to do the deed for her against the wishes of the husband and son. Pulling strings is the only way of such types.