did anyone watch the opening of big brother last night?

they have a house full of 18 year old women, with one or two others, no men. i think they are going to introduce the males later?

it does show how ridiculously gender orientated british society is, there is no way they would focus on gender in spain.

if ever there was an advert for needing men, then last nights program was it, i sat through the whole thing thinking 'please, please! give us a man'.

the look on their faces when they realised there were no men was funny, all dressed up and nobody to show of too. There were also two older women and one who looked like she was a man (its possible?) they were quickly isolated.

its quite funny watching the older generation of feminists sat watching the egotistical monsters that they have created, and watching how isolated they are from them, and how little they understand what they have created.

You seem to be getting more and more of whats going on FC... Hurrah!!!.

That BB is trashy, manipulative but this as you describe BB ,that is a miniature of what feminists want. BB will send in a hunky guy to stir it up.

They will be deliberately trying to cause all sorts of division and dissension among those women. I would say that BB will some day soon end in tragedy. Do they really care about those young women in there? No they dont, if any of them get hurt BB will put on a display of regret but they really could not care less.


If you teach your daughters, the big picture, that not all men are pigs... if you teach them that evil is not unique to men,that both men and women can be evil. If you teach them clearly right from wrong, and if they find themselves in a society which has alienated or even exterminated most of the men by what ever means(they usually send us of to war or as now - so many young men kill themsleves) they - your daughters will have an advantage of knowledge that most women wont have, because their mother listened to what ordinary men had to say and acted on the truth, however distasteful. All these " isms " wrap their evil in a sugarcoated layer they present some truth, some good but it is only a veneer, the tablet when taken is bitter and is a deadly poison.To lead people astray Hitler Stalin and all evil leaders knew this. They did not hesitate to slaughter the very people who helped them in power.

aMEN to that Dr. Banner!

Maybe BB wont to show that if you fill a house with women it will end in a cat fight as they try to out manipulate each other, and their will be no guys to get on side by the use of ass wiggling demonstrations lol! I personally found the last one farcical and I don't agree that the Shetty woman was bullied. However, she did belong to two special interest groups while the other girls only belonged to one therefore Shetty was more of a "victim" than the others.

i think lots of young people today have stunted emotional development, 18 year olds jumping up and down on sofas like a 2 year old??

Yip.. and I wonder why that is?

Think it takes till they are about the 35 though before they start to consider "growing up" these days..

Of course, women dont need to take that option even then..

They dont need to grow up till they breed..

As a voyeuristic observer of social/sexual dynamics born of an interest in anthropology/history - big brother (ch4) has proven to be an (interestingly chronologically intermittent) "accelerated" microcosm of societys "corrupted" views, stances and misconceptions regarding many topical subjects.

I was writing a piece whilst I tuned into the (mostly) self-concerned/egotistical vacuous twitterings of these utterly BORING women. The conversation revisited an already tiresome subject to which these "one-dimensional souls" sought solace - fashion.

However, for some reason one of the politically-assimilated-correctoids slavishly regurgitated some incomprehensible twaddle about women in Iran being "forced" to wear the burkha.

Amazingly, one of the older women (I think she's a peace campaigner, and a "possible fem" - given that by her own admission has lived at Greenham Common -- a hotbed of feminist militancy) proclaimed: (I'm paraphrasing now) "Actually women in Iran make up the majority of university entrants, they outperform men (oppression before when the reverse was true, empowerment now women prevail in scholarly endeavour?) hold positions such as: doctors, lawyers, professors, businesswomen, scientists etc, that's only what most people hear via newspapers and the media."

Maybe she's read this or a similar site/forum as to her "righteous" enlightenment?

Then the conversation was extensively muted, or deliberately filtered? - thenceforth, with ironically staged deliverance, only the birds were twittering via piped contrived selective deliverance (birdsong is "annoyingly" played within the litigious paranoidal confines of --big brother-- whenever actual live conversation cannot be broadcast)!

she's a typical contrary left wing idiot..

say to her 'you go and live in iran then'

she'll either make up some stupid excuse or growl something at you... they identify with themselves as victims when really they are the oppressors. my mum is EXACTLY the same.

i cant imagine a worse place to live than somewhere were you cant even leave your own home without permission.

I suspect C£ have been told the only way you can run this show is by making grovelling apologies for allowing the previous contestants to argue in a non PC way and by the intervention of diversity advisors to stage manage the show. The mind numbingly boring output at the moment could cause millions to switch off imo. I will force myself to watch the "highlights" on a research basis!

It's also worth noting there are groups of women who defend their right to wear the clothes such as burkha's. It seems, that many women in Iran actually like them... how dare they make a decision that doesn't run with feminist ideals.

Wouldn't the wearing of a burkha (universally) be "logically" -- supposedly -- compliant with not treating women as sex-objects - given that her "folds of joy" can't be seen?

Yet, in a contradictory fashion, she (western women) incessantly markets herself as one, in order to reap all it's obvious extensive benefits?

But then womens own innate thirst contradicts a need to attract the opposite sex?

But with a burkha, most females, and even feminists REALIZE (in the western world) from an early age "inherently" realize their DILUTED POWER over men if this was so!

Point being, the more naked flesh on offer sells whatever crap, be it consumerist products, ideologies or morals - at the betterment of women, and wholly at the detriment of men?

Also, isn't it amazing how feminists and western women "foist" their tainted thinking on other women in parts of the world - given their only "perspective" is what oprah and trisha indoctrinate them with (ie: feminism,
or variants of)?