Thread: BBC misandry..

Quote from Exposing Feminism

OK, so I'm just searching for some evidence of misandry at the BBC to prove a point in a discussion I'm having, and I appear to have hit paydirt..

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/if/3545831.stm

It's astonishing that an institution that is legally required to be politically impartial can get away with this garbage.

DEFINITION

impartial: --> Supporting the Politically Correct agenda and platform.

Yep
ExposingFeminism -misandry in the BBC
You will find plenty of it in their archives.
The phenomenal suicide rate of men in the uk imust surely connected to the general misandry and hostility to men? This theme of men being redundant is born from real and deep hatred it pervades the media in much of it output

Lets be plain about it the media have been to the fore in promoting misandry. Imagine a programme or "Are Women no longer needed? "a book titled
"Are women necessary?"
No even putting forward such a fascistic question - it just would not have entered my head . Morally I feel bound from even responding in similar kind because its irrational not to say downright EVIL!
The American media feminist Maureen O Dowd has no such moral qualms and has a book out "Are men necessary?"
I note one comment mentioned the deep seated desire many women seem to have to dominate men. I have noticed the bossy tendencies in too many women and I find them utterly tiresome. I just walk away without responding. Such women are a dime a dozen in the media where attention seeking reigns supreme.

Avoid these ike the plague because they get very vindictive when thy dont get their own way and in the workplace - guess who gets the blame in any conflict.

This idea is very prevalent in the feminist dominated media - that men are "surplus to requirements"
Very bad karma . I really avoid hate speech like this Why because I am firmly of the belief that what goes around comes around. We gentlemen are now used to all this cast a cold eye on it all and be on your way let the media rot. Dont be around them. Leave them to it.
For they willl look around some day soon and find it is they who are redundant....amidst whatever cosmic tragedy the next few decades must surely witness.

I just walk away without responding.

I feel like that sometimes, but then my dander rises and I won't.

We must all repond, immediately. Its an easy one. Just ask, loudly (so everyone around hears), "Would you say that about Jews or Abos? Bigotry is bigotry, it doesn't matter which group is the target of your ignorant hate-speech. So fuck off".

We must all repond, immediately. Its an easy one. Just ask, loudly (so everyone around hears), "Would you say that about Jews or Abos? Bigotry is bigotry, it doesn't matter which group is the target of your ignorant hate-speech. So fuck off"

LOL ...
Percy I will keep that in mind....I am like my logo very very mild mannered.
I am not afraid of any women .What I do fear is my temper which is very bad.
Thats why I walk away.
"making a woman feel threatened" in my staff manual is enough to get you sacked. No mention of men of course. I will have to work on the above but with controled anger. YTou are right we should challenge bigoted statements.


More BBC misandry here "The Future is Female" well well RIP BBC cuase I dont know how the f*** they think their shabby outfit will be run by women only.Not to mention all the disaffected men out there who may have other plans.The articles like these have a strong whiff of junk "science" (I hesitate to denigrate the mighty word science as such) about them:


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6518241.stm

note the folowing setence too:
"Although men do work in roles requiring such interpersonal skills, they are dominated by women."

Had the job in question been mostly staffed by men the femibeeb would describe it as "male dominated"

Quote from Dr David Banner

Yep
ExposingFeminism -misandry in the BBC
I have noticed the bossy tendencies in too many women and I find them utterly tiresome. I just walk away without responding.

So do I .....but not before I have chucked the contents of my wine glass into their faces before I storm off!

The entire BBC is so misandrist you wouldn't believe it if it wasn't so plain and obvious. You even hear the occasional snide anti male comments from some of the continuity announcers when advertising forthcoming programs.

The Archers is on the BBC - say no more!

Quote from Ledburian

So do I .....but not before I have chucked the contents of my wine glass into their faces before I storm off!

The entire BBC is so misandrist you wouldn't believe it if it wasn't so plain and obvious. You even hear the occasional snide anti male comments from some of the continuity announcers when advertising forthcoming programs.

The Archers is on the BBC - say no more!

Yep, BBC is as misandrist as CBS, NBC, CNN, and FOX

Blessings

Bob

It's ironic how not only the supplanted ideologically-driven media origins of feminism took an insidious root - in the fertile corrupted regions of media -- The BBC. But we the public, began, or rather was forced to pay for their middle class arrogant political petulance of thought irregardless - of personal choice.

Ironically feminists in (1914-15) unleashed several bombs outside of the now BBC (as then!), alongside conducting over 200+ acts of treason, arson (several royal palace fires) and a conspiracy to murder the then prime minister Herbert Asquith!!!!!!

Genuine Misandry is synonymous (fashionable) with the very constructed disgusted essence that flows "unchallenged" throughout the 'vibrant' rat-runs of the ideologically-driven - misandric - western - media.

As an aside from this, I'd like to set up a public misandry vs misogyny debate. With this firstly, more importantly - we will introduce the words misandry, misandric and misandrist to the world.

Until now, feminists, appeasers and the weak willed have inadvertently moulded literary political existence to greater extents. That is, until concepts of male hatred are accepted and "defined" across society, these words will remain an alien language in society and therefore misunderstood.Time for some influential change that will introduce these well 'overdue' - "politically pregnant" - definitions!

I thought this quote out of the comments for the programme was so good I'd archive it here:-

The stark truth is that war isn't fought between the sexes - it is between armies. Ask the Tutsis, ask the Croatians, ask the victims of Pol Pot or Hitler.
Like it or not the main factor that determines the survival of your genes is how good your men are at fighting wars - and that depends upon how readily philosophy/religion or shared paranoia binds men and women together in a common purpose.
The battle between the sexes is a side-show, an entertainment that has been made possible by the surplus wealth that has been the product of the stability that has been derived from the long term military success of the liberal West. If you give enough people enough money, they will fight over anything - or even nothing.
Most of the world's population are struggling to acquire the basic things in life - and the most important of those is security, not sexual equality.
Mark Thomas, Redhill

Quote from Dr David Banner

Yep
ExposingFeminism -misandry in the BBC
You will find plenty of it in their archives.
The phenomenal suicide rate of men in the uk imust surely connected to the general misandry and hostility to men? This theme of men being redundant is born from real and deep hatred it pervades the media in much of it output

Yes, the BBC, Hollywood and all other media are killing men at worst and helping to destroy the prospects of a generation of boys at the very least (gang culture being just one manifestation).

Quote from Dr David Banner

Lets be plain about it the media have been to the fore in promoting misandry. Imagine a programme or "Are Women no longer needed? "a book titled
"Are women necessary?"
No even putting forward such a fascistic question - it just would not have entered my head . Morally I feel bound from even responding in similar kind because its irrational not to say downright EVIL!
The American media feminist Maureen O Dowd has no such moral qualms and has a book out "Are men necessary?"

This is why I so long for the day when the artificial womb and the shaggable, beautiful, female android arrive: just so that women will understand at last what redundancy feels like and how men have felt for decades: UNNECESSARY

Quote from Dr David Banner

I note one comment mentioned the deep seated desire many women seem to have to dominate men. I have noticed the bossy tendencies in too many women and I find them utterly tiresome. I just walk away without responding. Such women are a dime a dozen in the media where attention seeking reigns supreme.

Avoid these ike the plague because they get very vindictive when thy dont get their own way and in the workplace - guess who gets the blame in any conflict.

Women are so aggressive these days. Even just walking in a crowded street they expect you to totally make way for them. None of this 'I'll move a bit and you move a bit and we'll pass without coliding' nonsense. You have to totally make way for her, even if she marches out of a shop without really looking you have to duck out of her way, because she's a superior being right? Just like drinking pints and not being able to cook are political, feminist, statements, so too is automatically disrespecting men.

part of a comment from Chris from the bbc link:

Surely this is the very antithesis of equality? This situation as proposed by the BBC merely represents a reversal in "traditional" gender roles and as such reflects the problems that women faced with equality some 20-30 years ago, but this time it is being imposed upon men.

I don't actually think there ever was a time when men proposed that women were redundant and worthless. There was never institutional hatred of women, they were always loved and valued. What men are going through is completely different.

The BBC are VERY guilty of blatant misandry.

A few instances, all BBC, come to mind.

One time, on BBC breakfast news, they had a woman on promoting her charity, which was specifically for women with lung cancer. First of all, this was clearly discriminatory against men, so shouldn't have been promoted in the first place, paid for by the license money, half of which comes from men. Secondly, this woman was not challenged once when she stated "Sure, it's sad when a family loses a father to lung cancer, but it's even more devastating for a family to lose a mother to lung cancer, which is why I set up my charity". Utterly despicable that this trollop was ever given air time.

Just a few weeks ago, they had a report about domestic violence, I posted a thread about it here: http://antimisandry.com/more_dv_bs-t11521.html
While discussing it, they had a huge poster in the background of a woman curled up in fear (of who I wonder?), and they had 2 women on to talk about it, one was from a women against violence campaign, the other was a domestic violence victim who claimed she didn't have enough "confidence" to leave. Absolutely no mention whatsoever of women being violent in relationships, they were totally painted as the victim, when the violent person was mentioned, it was always him/his/he, totally disgraceful.

It was probably about 5 years ago, but they done a report about how boys were doing better in schools, and it was reported in a way that suggested that something should be done to help the girls match the boys.
Fast forward a few years, and it's the opposite way around, the girls are now smarter, but they don't report it the same, it's reported more in a way that suggests that girls are just better than boys, not a mention of helping the boys catch up, it was all reported in a celebratory fashion, sickening.

And let's not forget the programme they aired an entire series of on BBC 2, remember, men pay for a TV license as well as women, the programme was called "How To Train Your Husband", it was an old woman explaining how to henpeck your husband, it was totally out of order, as they would never have shown a programme that suggested women needed to be "trained".

I know Eastenders is only a soap opera, but the way one of the characters on that show was basically hailed as a heroine for smacking her husband in the face with an iron, knocking him out, was absolutely sickening. Her character was called "Little Moe", the "Little" added to her victim status, and her husband was abusive, as in "shouted at her" abusive.
It was always on the news as the story went on for days, and BBC news always advertise BBC shows by talking about them, but the way it was done was truly annoying, "he deserved it" they said, "he had it coming" they said, and of course they would have said those same things about a female character who was struck with an iron for shouting at her partner, wouldn't they?

I hate the BBC, and haven't ever paid for my TV license, my TV works fine without it, they can whistle for the money, I don't pay to be painted as a violent moron who deserves to be mistreated, I'd sooner give my money to a bunch of man-hating lesbians than I would the BBC, oh wait, they're the same thing.

Quote from 6ame

I hate the BBC, and haven't ever paid for my TV license, my TV works fine without it, they can whistle for the money, I don't pay to be painted as a violent moron who deserves to be mistreated, I'd sooner give my money to a bunch of man-hating lesbians than I would the BBC, oh wait, they're the same thing.

I hate them too. Every single drama they produce is a reverse sexist, man hating, piece of garbage. There's even a formula they follow: each drama should include a strong, morally superior, woman; a member of at least one ethnic minority (if a man, he will be weaker than the woman but stronger than any white men, or will at least be morally superior to them); and finally at least one very weak or weak/evil white man. Even if it wasn't so outrageously unjust and hypocritiical, it's just so bloody BORING.

The BBC......Radio 4

Tune in between 19:00 -19:15hrs Sunday to Friday evenings.
Repeats 14:00 -14:15hrs Monday to Friday
Omnibus edition: Sunday 10:00 - 11:15hrs

Program: THE ARCHERS
The world's longest running radio soap opera.
The program was the brainchild of a MALE and the first episode was broadcast in January 1951
Basically the story was meant to be about a farming family and life in a small village in the Englsh country side. In other words "An Everyday Story of country Folk"
Scripts written my MALES
Producer and Directors were MALES
Storylines were basically related to the average life of farming people, involving normal working and leisure issues of such people in rural England....some happy, some sad, as in all lives.

The prgram has continued to run and looks set to un until the end of time, BUT.............................slowly but steadily the WOMEN began to take over the whole show.......the original MALE scriptwriters either retired or died off, as did the producers and directors, and in recent years the males were replaced by WIMMIN, and I mean WIMMIN, as more and more they changed the whole tenor of the program and more and more the storylines took on very strong feminits themes, and small as this mythical village of AMBRIDGE is supposed to be the new FEMALE writers brought in a whole range of really stupid story lines, and involving practically every kind of social, politically correct issue under God's sun.

Male characters were gradually replaced by female characters - from the vicar, to the lawyer, to the doctor, to the vet and to company bosses....women took over, and step by step those male characters who remained were, step by step, increasingly portrayed as either flawed in some way, or adulterous, or just plain stupid, or inadequate, or a cheat, or a liar, or a loser of some kind, and even a rapist in one case. And in another case a man in his 80s is portrayed as a "difficult case of Alzheimers prone to outrageously unpredictable and confusing behaviour" - he is seen as a great trial for his wife, and all the sympathy is heaped on her not him, the real sufferer.

Even a baby BOY of just 2 years is seen made out to be a "selfish self seeking little brat".

Meanwhile, this strange village is full of unselfish, virtuous, industrious, long suffering (due to male behaviour) victimised WOMEN, in which [practically every episode shows them suffering from the actions of all the "idiot" males making their lives to "difficult".

The entire BBC now runs according to Feminits rules and agendas.

End of.

Tune in sometime and see for yourself.

Quote from brian44

I hate them too. Every single drama they produce is a reverse sexist, man hating, piece of garbage.

Hi Brian44,

In actual fact there is no such thing as 'reverse sexism' any more than there is such a thing as 'reverse racism' - these clumsy phrases have been purposely constructed to convey political thought - in this case, the idea that it is usually white men who are sexist and/or racist.

We refer to this here as 'Cultural Marxism' . Cultural Marxism can be seen as a decendent of 'Critical Theory' , a communist devised political science designed to influence public opinion.

I hope you don't mind me pulling you up on this!

Yours in fraternity,
E F