Antimisandry.com mentioned in The Guardian

**Dr David Banner** · 15th-February-2008

LOL howdy Celtic Druid....I am surviving, just about ..what flotsam and jetsam are you expecting washed up on antimisandrys golden shores?
I suppose we can expect some trolling etc.

If the press were free and democratic and open minded they would have more debate. The paper princesses are used to pontificating not getting answered back.

We see only propaganda from them and these guardian feminists have insulted lied and slandered about men for decades.Now we can get a word in edgeways they are not too pleased....
Julie Bindel hates men and says so openly in a headline her column .No man would get away with openly proclaming he hated women in his newspaper column not in any newspaper.

Yet here we on antimisandry have even urged men not to return the injustices hatred we have received for decades.

This is plain for all to see anyone who reads this site will find mostly its temperate. Keep firing insults and slander its well only human that we respond in kind now and then.Once in a while I lose my temper and return fire at women making the usual misandrist statements. I take no pleasure in this. I have offered the olive branch to feminist and lesbians I have met only more injustice and slander.

Feminists always return to personal attacks.They select your words out of context to demonise you further. We cannot reason with them.

We will continue to tell the truth and MRN if the left try and silence us it will be their undoing.We will more loudly and forcefully tell it like it is. We know we speak the truth and we are confident that feminism will be defeated and to be exposed as the evil hate movement it is.
Bye bye feminism.

**Male-Rights-Network** · 15th-February-2008

We will continue to tell the truth and MRN if the left try and silence us it will be their undoing.We will more loudly and forcefully tell it like it is.

Yes, but the only trouble is most of this discussion is happening online, because as you say the media is run by paper princesses, admen and politically correctoids. I think it's fair to say that there was no proper reaction to feminism and misandric laws from men until the Internet. Even with a growing awareness among men of men's rights issues, the media still won't touch the subject with a bargepoll; it's still more gynocentric propaganda. Criticising feminism or caring about men would be unacceptable in any serious political party. So if our (feminist) Governments tied up the Internet, they could potentially silence most of our discussion. And we all know how much most women/all feminists hate critical discussion of their "equality" movement.

**Alexandra** · 15th-February-2008

Is that a man or a woman?

These feminist claim to be "pro-woman" (whatever that means anymore) yet don't mind looking like men. Seems to me such "womyn" are the real misogynists.

**bachelor tom** · 15th-February-2008

Quote from Alexandra

These feminist claim to be "pro-woman" (whatever that means anymore) yet don't mind looking like men. Seems to me such "womyn" are the real misogynists.

I agree. Radical feminists seem to hate being women, in particular everything connected with child-bearing.

**Male-Rights-Network** · 15th-February-2008

I don't know if I'd say that they're misogynistic. Above all they are greedy, vindicative and uncaring people.

**Feminist_Scum** · 16th-February-2008

I dunno, they do seem to hate women in their most natural form. What could be more misogynistic than that?

**Alexandra** · 16th-February-2008

My point exactly.

This is more to the feminazis' liking:

**Feminist_Scum** · 16th-February-2008

As a straight man, it's very depressing. I love really feminine women, but today's women are disgusting. There are some who are nice, but they're becoming like disgusting messes. It's disgusting. Feminists like that, are women in their most disgusting form. I want a REAL WOMAN, not some total mess which disgusts me.

**Dr David Banner** · 17th-February-2008

Agreed FS..
I wonder what you all think what qualities makes a good woman.
I certainly know the qualities I admire in a woman - which to me are warmth gentleness sensitivity and intelligence (arent these things actually strengths?)

State this today and of course you will be told you "want a doormat"- which is nonsense - surely most true realtionships are built on putting the other first- man or woman?Notice that you cant help what you admire in the opposite sex its the way we are made.You certainly are not forcing a single personality type on anyone by being attracted to certain qualities.So why the hostility to these qualities?

What they call nowadays "attitude" or "fiesty" I think of as loud and arrogant and repulsive, and for the record a man acting this way is just as obnoxious.
I have met giants of men with the strength of an ox who were gentle and polite and respectful to others -and thus loved by all.

Ask our feminist journo "charmers" in the Guardian what makes a good man there answer would be the only good man is a dead man.But hey I never buy any papers any more because its the same script I read twenty years ago from journos who just dont do reason or objectivity. The two pillars I would have thought that make a good journalist.
We can predict the typical feminist response to a post
eg.

What they call nowadays "attitude" or "fiesty" I think of as loud and arrogant and repulsive

this was at the antimisanrdy website sistas they want us wimin as slaves

This is how feminists quote As KM showed
FEMINISM IS A LIE

**LukeSkywalker** · 17th-February-2008

Quote from KellyMac

This just makes us seem to be the misogynists they paint us to be. Uncool.

Don't worry about it. Seriously, don't. Even if people genuinely have a problem with something misogynist that we wrote, then we can just point to the scum manifesto and all will be well

**Celtic Druid** · 18th-February-2008

I'd like Cath Elliot or any other 'concerned' lesbian to contribute to this thread (or start another) regarding the taboo subject of lesbian domestic violence.

Or is protecting a flawed ideology above protecting the physical wellbeing of many lesbian women, who's voices and safety "seemingly" go unnoticed in the mainstream perception, and protected/enforced by law?

I'd be most interested in ascertaining as to when a woman is being beaten senseless by her female partner, whether she's 'silently' bearing the bloody brutality for the "cause" or more realistically she'd just like it to stop, and, see her assailant rightfully punished for her barbarity!

I know their are a few small fringe organizations which are run by a few brave women that offer help to lesbian victims of domestic violence, but they are routinely shunned by a culture of silence within the general lesbian community that refuses to accept this endemic reality.

Just as with a cult, ideology overides the rights of the individual. It supplants free thought with a fearful adherence to a tainted doctrinal thinking.

Time for change!