Quote from frostyboy

But a site connected to Misandry News, called Antimisandry, is filled with unapologetic feminism bashing. In the same way some feminist blame female inequality on an outside group (guys), Antimisandry points the finger at feminism. I’m seeing some parallels here.

How is condemning a hate movement the same as condemning an entire gender?

And it isn't the same thing...

Feminism bashing is based on factual evidence and male bashing is based on allegations without proof or evidence. Think about crimes like abuse, harassment, and rape, what do they all have in common?

They are often allegations made against males without evidence and get males into a lot of trouble and often are used to justify biased laws passed against men. That's why when women make allegations against males without proof I assume that those women would be just as likely to allege rape, abuse, or harassment against a male.

"But a site connected to Misandry News, called Antimisandry, is filled with unapologetic feminism bashing"
they can hand it out-but they cannot take it

(sex-driven Neanderthals parading as men)

i like that-this would be her fantasy

it is a "her"-isn't it?

There is a mind-set that says you cant 'hate' communism just because of Joe Stalin and 40 million murders. And Just because Hitler gassed 6 million and set the whole of Europe on fire there is no call for hating Nazis. Just because our society is falling apart at the seams, families are destroyed daily, our Courts are a travesty for Justice and lies are common currency, is no excuse for 'hating' feminism.

Hello !!

(sex-driven Neanderthals parading as men)



These are the real sex driven neanderthals!.

Did you see that "Woman's Last Stand: Dodge Charger Commercial Spoof" video. I went to the YouTube comments section for that: http://www.youtube.com/comment_servl...%3Dou5Ens-qNRc and left some comments (my YouTube handle is zackzebra). I also gave thumbs up to some comments that seemed sympathetic to men's rights and thumbs down to the especially nasty feminist ones. I'd encourage others here to do the same.

Quote from Meadester

Did you see that "Woman's Last Stand: Dodge Charger Commercial Spoof" video. I went to the YouTube comments section for that: http://www.youtube.com/comment_servl...%3Dou5Ens-qNRc and left some comments (my YouTube handle is zackzebra). I also gave thumbs up to some comments that seemed sympathetic to men's rights and thumbs down to the especially nasty feminist ones. I'd encourage others here to do the same.

Not bad, not bad at all!

"" If we want to stand for gender equality, we have to fight for equality for all genders""

the wimyn part of "all genders"

wouldn't countenance gender equality

I don't know enough about trans genders or men trapped in wimyn's bodies whatever hahah

gender equality is a cant current buzz phrase for the dissembling feminit wimyn; sound altruistic even - something that one might find in the founding constitution of the USA

but !! there is more !! equality is femiit wimyn's code dear to the femnit hegemony but some of the sisters have led the cat out of the bag it is not equality they want it is the elimination of the male of the species en toto

the above article is a specious feminit propaganda come-on promoting gender equality of the feminit hegemony kind or as Orwell coined it some of the animals were a tad more equal than others

But a site connected to Misandry News, called Antimisandry, is filled with unapologetic feminism bashing. In the same way some feminist blame female inequality on an outside group (guys), Antimisandry points the finger at feminism. I’m seeing some parallels here.

The author contradicts the claim of seeing parallels by pointing out (herself?) we target feminism (not all women) and feminists themselves blame men ("guys") generally. Hardly the same is it?

And yes, some of us are defiantly unapologetic in our righteous stance against the tyranny of feminism.

So who cares about the Sexademic website?

It looks like a very minor blog by yet another tiresomely sexist female, and attracts minimal readership.

Don't invest it with more importance than it deserves.

Just as an aside, in the 10th reply on the Sexademic blog someone posted what they described as a "massive discussion about this post going on at MetaFilter: http://www.metafilter.com/89767/Arabian-Goggles

And apart from a varied number of viewpoints, the encouraging thing looking through the many posts was how many times the word misandry was mentioned. And nobody questioned the validity of the word either. Progress.

Quote from Celtic Druid

Just as an aside, in the 10th reply on the Sexademic blog someone posted what they described as a "massive discussion about this post going on at MetaFilter: http://www.metafilter.com/89767/Arabian-Goggles

And apart from a varied number of viewpoints, the encouraging thing looking through the many posts was how many times the word misandry was mentioned. And nobody questioned the validity of the word either. Progress.

She probably only mentioned "antimisandry" to get more hits because when you type up antimisandry this site comes up on the first page.

Quote from Popadibs

She probably only mentioned "antimisandry" to get more hits because when you type up antimisandry this site comes up on the first page.

Maybe, but in her quest to attain more hits we get more exposure in turn.

Quote from Celtic Druid

Maybe, but in her quest to get more hits we get more exposure in turn.

Yep and she's basically shooting herself in the ass!