40 days - 40 nights - rape scene

**felixblue** · 22nd-May-2012

Anyone who knows what is what with the female sex drive will be aware that it is very different to the male sex drive. It is the main power a woman has over men and even if she is not conscious of how she is using it (women hardly ever are, but the facts and statistics tell the story well as any man who has recently married and noted a sudden decline in her interest once she has "achieved her goal" will attest.. And that doesn't just apply to the wedding ring, it applies to major purchases, etc.. They have one tool to achieve pretty much everything they can get from a man, and they use it with impunity and men usually succumb to it..)..

Do women need sex more or less than men?

Arguably, they need it much more..

Every good worker needs their main tools..

It is well established that men do not NEED sex at all.. As many of the mostly celibate MRA's will tell you..

By the way, how is good old fred x doing these days?

Surely he must have resurfaced somewhere eh?

**The Possible Human** · 22nd-May-2012

I got in a ferocious argument with some young feminist women at work over this film. They kept on insisting that the man wasn't raped because he got an erection and had an orgasm. I blasted them with having an orgasm does not mean it was consensual. Repeatedly, I asked "Did the man give consent for sexual intercourse??". The twits said he did by getting an erection, to which I countered with: "So it's not rape if a man forces himself on a woman and gives her an orgasm during the act, right? That is YOUR logic with the genders reversed."" OMG, did they hate that comparison, but a couple actually said "it could be construed as rape". So it was or it wasn't. Other men at work were of the same opinion as me, and they let the young femininazi's know exactly what they thought.

Of course the young feminazis won't even speak to me or some of the other guys which is perfectly fine by me.

**felixblue** · 22nd-May-2012

A man wakes with a solid boner on.

A woman mounts him in his sleep..

Is that not rape?

In have had much experience of women doing that to me..

I they dont usually press charges though..

**Marx** · 23rd-May-2012

Arousal is not consent.

One reason we know this for 100% is because feminists say so themselves.

Part of the shame-factor involved with rape victims is that while their mind said "NO" their body says "YES". In other words, the body will respond accordingly - and that means when a woman is raped she is often damp and thus penetration can occur. Even in just the recent past, it was confirmed that internal bruising from rape & consensual sex was difficult to differentiate.

On one hand, this could be awkward as it could mean a consenting woman then claims rape and has the bruises to 'prove' it... on the other hand, a rapist could insist it was consensual and point to the fact that science has proven little (or no) difference between bruising of rape victims & consensual lovers, thus, disproving her claims.

Either way - what matters is that arousal is NOT considered under rape claims... If the genitals are aroused during rape - it is not pertinent to the fact that the victim did not consent.

Therefore, the character portrayed in this film was most definitely a victim of rape and it is no surprised whatsoever that a feminist would use any logic to 'prove' it wasn't rape purely because it was a male victim.