http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6970516.stm

Wow, this is pretty shocking really. Hope those 3 bitch skanks get some serious time in prison for this.

What are the chances of that happening?
I doubt this story will even get much coverage in most of the media, it'll just be ignored by most newspapers...

Because they were female it wasn't called rape or even sexual assault. And four whole years for that it's disgusting.

My oh my, this kid was 'lucky' right?

This was worse than normal rape, they actually tortured him in the process.

Let's hope they meet some big fat butch lesbians in prison who'd like to make bitches out of them.

By detention do they mean staying after class?

Now now naysayers, I am sure that these detention terms ranging from 2-4 years for the sexual assault of this man will indeed be quite harsh. They may even be forced to write, "I will not sexually assault young boys" on the blackboard a couple of times.

Once again, feminism has made women everything they say that they hated in men, only worse.

Yeah, they got detention, what does that even mean?

HOME DETENTION CURFEW

Some prisoners can be released early from jail and electronically tagged for the rest of their sentence under the home detention curfew scheme.
Most offenders sentenced to at least three months but less than four years can be freed up to four and a half months early, following an assessment of the risk of them reoffending and whether they would comply with a curfew.
The prisoner is under curfew in their home for no less than nine hours a day, usually overnight. A breach of curfew sees the person returned to jail.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1869485/posts

1,000 danger convicts are set free without tags
By JAMES SLACK - More by this author » Last updated at 22:00pm on 20th July 2007

Out: An early-release scheme prisoner leaves jail
Nearly 1,000 criminals freed early to ease the prison overcrowding crisis had previously been rated too unsafe to be let out with an electronic tag, it has emerged.

They were ordered to remain behind bars because governors rated them a high risk of re-offending.

Despite these fears, they have been freed under Labour's controversial early release scheme announced as an emergency measure last month after the prison population hit a record 81,000.

The 951 criminals were among the first batch of 1,400 inmates released from the end of last month, 18 days before the end of their sentence. Each was given £172, to make up for the loss of bed and board in jail.

Yesterday's revelation is yet another blow for the early release policy which the Conservatives described as 'potentially highly dangerous'.

The party's justice spokesman Edward Garnier said: 'If they were not safe to be let out on tags, why are they safe to be let out with taxpayers' cash in their pockets but no tags on their ankles?

'Some 225 of these inmates were serving sentences of between one and four years which suggests they had committed very serious crimes.

'The Government are letting out utterly unsuitable offenders early without proper checks, at least six of whom have simply grabbed the cash given them on release and gone out to commit further offences. This scheme is potentially highly dangerous and undermines public safety.'
Ministers insisted all inmates set free would be properly assessed to ensure there was no risk to the public.

But opposition MPs questioned how this could be the case if 951 of those freed in the first batch had been denied their freedom under the separate home detention curfew scheme.

The scheme, introduced by Labour shortly after coming to power, allows inmates sentenced to four years or less to be freed up to four and a half months before they reach the halfway point - the usual release date - wearing an electronic tag.

Violent and sexual offenders are normally turned down, along with anybody rated at risk of reoffending or who does not have a suitable home address. Having been rejected, the 951 offenders were considered only a few weeks or months later for the panic early release scheme - and allowed to walk free despite the past concerns.

It suggests the hurdle for the early release scheme, despite ministerial assurances, is dramatically lower than for the home detention curfew scheme.

Of all the inmates given early release - including those who had not previously applied for the home detention curfew scheme - at least six have reoffended.

The total number freed under the scheme stands at 1,700. They include 344 convicted of violence, along with 24 robbers, 149 burglars and 65 drug offenders

Thirty are back behind bars after breaching their release conditions. A further 18 are 'unlawfully at large' after failing to stay in contact with probation officers.

Despite the early releases, prison numbers are already beginning to rise again.

The jail population has returned to almost 80,000. Privately, officials fear that by autumn they could be facing a fresh overcrowding crisis.
A spokesman for the Ministry of Justice said the early release and home detention curfew schemes had different eligibility criteria, reflecting the longer period - up to four and a half months - for which prisoners had to comply with conditions under the latter policy.

Those ineligible for that scheme might therefore pass the criteria for release 18 days early under the plan to ease prison overcrowding.

I wonder if these girls fall under this system - under curfew, living in their own homes - having to sleep in their own beds at night (with electronic tags), and free to do as they please during the day?

2 of my sisters violently assaulted a man on a bus, and one of them got tagged. She actually took the box which interacts with the tag to the pub with her once I'm told.

It's fucking useless.

Put those bitches in prison with Big Betty where they belong.