outdoors wrote;
Being charged and being guilty are two differen't thing's.

Of course being male there is no chance of innocence.

I suppose that the Genius support's putting men's name and faces that are possibly falsely accused of rape on the front page also,before they even get to trial to defend themselves?

I agree with the naming and shaming,I will never agree with naming them untill they are proven guilty.

Of course destroying a man's life is just fine,just because of an accusation he must be guilty.

Teacher cleared of sex charges unsure of future

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/ ... ching.html

Judge allows Duke lacrosse lawsuit to go forward
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/03/31/ju ... ws#content#ixzz22fkL09Aj
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/03/31/ju ... ws#content


In both instances(there are many more) the accused have had their names and pictures published before they were guilty of anything.

Their lives are over regardless of innocence.

Of course the feminist argument to this is;

"Men falsely accused can learn from the experience"

Vandilay

There are a lot of examples of men not being treated fairly but I know of a case where a couple seperated in Dryden, the father took the only child to Alberta, drained all bank accounts, sold the house and took every dime. This woman hired a lawyer who billed her over $10000 and then told her to hire an Albertan lawer as he could not help her. She moved to Alberta, got a job and hired another lawyer. After 2 years of fighting and paying a new lawyer she finally has the legal right to see her child but unfortunatly the child has been brainwashed into hating her and does not want to see her. The child will be at an age next year where the child can deside who gets custody. On top of all this the mother pays the father child support. If you are truly evil and know how to work the system like this man, you too can screw any woman over if you put your mind to it This is a post I made in another thread a long time ago. I do agree that alot of men do not get treated fairly but this case is still going on. This man has still not given her a dime and she pays him child support. If she misses a payment she can not see the child. Sounds crazy but it is true. I garrantee some people in this forum know these people. It goes to show that true evil can win out regardless of the law

outdoors wrote; I remember when you posted this straw-man argument. The fact is that women win over 90% of all custody. I am dealing with 2 father's at this very moment who are not allowed near their children. One asked ,"where are my right's?" and that was it...he hasn't seen his kid's in two years. His ex has ignored 12 court order's with absolutely no repercussion's. The other called the anti-family CAFS when he was being physically attacked by his significant other,the CAFS called the police who then aided the violent female in kidnapping the children then taking them all to the hosh house to live with the drug addict's and other feminist manhater's. The CAFS also lied to the police saying it was the woman that called for help,so now the real victim is being victimized again and has had his children stolen. While the violent female is free to do as she pleases. Dryden is the misandry capitol of Canada. On top of all this the mother pays the father child support Why? Is it only fair if the father pays? Welcome to the world of part-time equality.

Guinnessgenius wrote;

Outdoors1 with these statements

outdoors1 wrote:
police who then aided the violent female in kidnapping the children then taking them all to the hosh house to live with the drug addict's and other feminist manhater's.

The CAFS also lied to the police saying it was the woman that called for help,so now the real victim is being victimized again and has had his children stolen.

and

outdoors1 wrote:
Dr

yden is the misandry capitol of Canada.

and as a cherry on top of this sundae

outdoors1 wrote:
Of course the feminist argument to this is;

"Men falsely accused can learn from the experience"

You lose all credit and start sounding like a right-wing conspiracy "nut" sorry to use the word "nut" but it was the best I could come up with. Of course now with this unintentional insult you will attempt to blame me and other people who do not share your views as the reason why this country and many others have so many social disorders.

Also and I must use another quote and potentially a quote within a quote.

outdoors1 wrote:
Quote:
On top of all this the mother pays the father child support



Why? Is it only fair if the father pays?

Welcome to the world of part-time equality.



Well you see in this world of "part-time equality" as you put it, I should point out that it is very hard for women to get the same level of pay at some jobs as men, yes you do see female lawyers and doctors who earn more, but that is due to years and years of education. If a woman and a man were to start work at a company...ANY COMPANY at the exact same time. What are the odds that the man would earn slightly more than his female counterpart. I do politely ask that you put some thought into this and not go and pull up some link from Fox News (that's in America, there are some different rules up here) and Sun News (which is opinion based and I have yet to see any real attempt at journalism there) to prove your claim(s).

If you decide to you can take a personal shot at me it will further prove to myself and others on this forum that you have no case but just a rage issue and a misogynistic view of the world that refuses to conform to your draconian and archaic ideals. Seems like the easy route but I urge you not to provoke The Credible Hulk. You know who I am, and I have ways of finding out who you are.

So now I am a misogynist and am being threatened with exposure.

.

Seems I am nothing but a f'n misogynist for not agreeing with everything this person say's.

Seems to me the only one getting mindfucked is this guy himself.

"If you decide to you can take a personal shot at me it will further prove to myself and others on this forum that you have no case but just a rage issue and a misogynistic view of the world that refuses to conform to your draconian and archaic ideals. "




If you decide to you can take a personal shot at me

Standard schoolyard bluster, not worth responding to, then

further prove to myself and others on this forum

more of the same, plus she's got friends, so...

you have no case

so why trouble with the threats and innuendoes?

rage issue

Great schoolyard minds think alike, and switch easily from law ('No case') to psychoanalysis, to

misogynistic view of the world

cultural anthropology to

draconian and archaic ideals

political dialectics,


and all in one sentence.

Sure you're up to takin on these mental giants, OD?

Does this person even know what misogyny means? Nowhere have you posted anything suggesting you 'hate women'.. the fact you point out women gain custody 90% is 'hateful' of you? That you asked if they felt it only fair when men are made to pay is somehow 'hateful'?

What the hell?

I think this prat needs a dictionary.

I think his biggest issue was that I disagreed with putting someones name to the public without a trial and an actual guilty verdict which he wholeheartedly endorsed doing.

He discarded the links I provided as american and right wing garbage.

He also implied I was nuts for quoting the deranged feminist that said men can learn from the experience of being falsely accused.

He is a young man,I will see if there is anyway I can open his eye's to his lunacy and maybe make him change his opinion.

I have made a few posts that I have not posted here since then,he has been logged on but has not replied as of yet.

he also states ;

yes you do see female lawyers and doctors who earn more, but that is due to years and years of education.

I guess men don't do the same years and years in school.

Besides,female doctor's and lawyer's actually make less than men,because of children and family,don't work the same length of hours and don't generally like shift work.

I dunno how to even reply to this shit.

OpenSoundOff • View topic - Public Safety starts with the release of names

From OpenSoundOff • View topic - Public Safety starts with the release of names

Quote from Marx

Quote from Guinnessgenius

Outdoors1 with these statements

Quote from outdoors1

police who then aided the violent female in kidnapping the children then taking them all to the hosh house to live with the drug addict's and other feminist manhater's.
The CAFS also lied to the police saying it was the woman that called for help,so now the real victim is being victimized again and has had his children stolen.

and

Quote from outdoors1

Dryden is the misandry capitol of Canada.

and as a cherry on top of this sundae

Quote from outdoors1

Of course the feminist argument to this is;
"Men falsely accused can learn from the experience"

You lose all credit and start sounding like a right-wing conspiracy "nut" sorry to use the word "nut" but it was the best I could come up with. Of course now with this unintentional insult you will attempt to blame me and other people who do not share your views as the reason why this country and many others have so many social disorders.

Wait a second, how is his credibility sounding like 'anything' when these things DO happen.. and frequently? And what has the word 'nut' got to do with anything? You seem to be grasping at straws to put words in outdoors' mouth... If you google, you will see that the quote he gave isn't some conspiracy fuddy-duddy-stuff, but quite genuine. It's not his fault if feminists have said such things.

Quote from Guinnessgenius

Also and I must use another quote and potentially a quote within a quote.

Quote from outdoors1

Quote:
On top of all this the mother pays the father child support
Why? Is it only fair if the father pays?
Welcome to the world of part-time equality.

Well you see in this world of "part-time equality" as you put it, I should point out that it is very hard for women to get the same level of pay at some jobs as men, yes you do see female lawyers and doctors who earn more, but that is due to years and years of education. If a woman and a man were to start work at a company...ANY COMPANY at the exact same time. What are the odds that the man would earn slightly more than his female counterpart. I do politely ask that you put some thought into this and not go and pull up some link from Fox News (that's in America, there are some different rules up here) and Sun News (which is opinion based and I have yet to see any real attempt at journalism there) to prove your claim(s).

What jobs can legally pay women less than men? Piece rates perhaps, where men who work faster or lift more than a woman???
If a woman and man start work at a company... ANY COMPANY at the exact same time. What are the odds she will a) do less hours per week than the man? b) take more sick-time away from the company than the man? c) take more holidays than the man? d) leave a little-earlier than most others to do various jobs? and e) take time off for a pregnancy in which only she has the power to decide?
And that's why women earn less... Let me guess, you prefer to blame the mystical patriarchy? What were you saying about conspiracy nuts?

Quote from Guinnessgenius

If you decide to you can take a personal shot at me it will further prove to myself and others on this forum that you have no case but just a rage issue and a misogynistic view of the world that refuses to conform to your draconian and archaic ideals. Seems like the easy route but I urge you not to provoke The Credible Hulk. You know who I am, and I have ways of finding out who you are.

What has this entire topic or anything said thus far got to - even remotely - with 'hating women'?
Outdoors has pointed out that women gain custody 90% of the time. No hate there.
He pointed out he is currently engaged with two fathers struggling to see their children. No hate here either.
He pointed out that these safe-homes are often occupied by drug addicts and misandrists, both well documented realities for a lot of such-like homes. No hate there.
He then told a story about how CAFS misrepresented a call to the police resulting in the wrong person being arrested. No hate there.
He then asked whether the other poster felt it only fair if men have to pay women. No hate there.


So where's this 'woman hating' you're accusing him of?


While we're on the subject, precisely what is so draconian and archaic about wanting men to have equality as parents or to be treated with equality by the police?




I look forward to your reply.

OpenSoundOff • View topic - Public Safety starts with the release of names

Quote from Marx

Does this person even know what misogyny means? Nowhere have you posted anything suggesting you 'hate women'.. the fact you point out women gain custody 90% is 'hateful' of you? That you asked if they felt it only fair when men are made to pay is somehow 'hateful'?

What the hell?

I think this prat needs a dictionary.

Perhaps an enema that reaches all the way to the brain......

I am no getting into petty little sidetracked subjects,this is my latest comment;

mensrightshelp wrote:
Come my friend and debate your views on my site, you are always welcome.

He cannot stay on the same subject long enough to debate.

He is to busy fishing for something else.

He is a liberal supporter,the type that laughs at the thought of men having any right's or even equal right's,such as equal representation in government.

He would rather see women married to the government and being their new husband and protector.

I know this thread is getting a record amount of views,so I want to say to all the lurker's,especially the male friend's of this Genius.

When some of you get married and/or have kid's and then at least half of you get divorced(over half of you will) and you are forced to hand over your children,your income and your homes just remember;

It's not the politicions,it's not the judges and lawyer's,it's not just feminist's.
It is the white knight feminist's such as Genius that support the bias against you,remember him when you are being railroaded through a system designed to destroy you,financially and emotionally, just for useing it.

These type of guy's are your worst enemy and are traitor's to their own gender in their never-ending quest for female approval.

A comment from a friend of mine that seems to sum up these types very well;

Guinnessgenius is most likely a disingenous, self-serving ***** who is just trying to score brownie points with women. He might be dumb enough to believe the outdated rhetoric that he's hurling out, but the likelihood is he's just playing the game so he can elevate his position in the social ladder.

Whenever a man stands up and speaks a bit of truth about radical feminism's infiltration into government, academia and media, there will be a pandering mangina rubbing their hands and licking their lips, because they believe it's a golden opportunity to get into women's good books. Manginas want women to view them as their saviours, but they don't want to stand up and do anything courageous. They just sit back and create boogeymen where none exist, then hope that some dumb, amoral broad will come along and fall for the bait. You could say that manginas have very little respect for women. They're nothing but PUAs.

And for all you feminist and non-feminist women that are also watching this,I urge you to watch big gimpin's vid.I especially like the first few sentences,they seem to refer directly to Genius and his strategy.

Feminists are Misogynists (Women Destroyed Family)

Women have done more to hurt women than anyone else. I can't think of anything more misogynistic than spitting on the feminine role as nurturer and mother of the next generation. If a woman cannot be a wife and mother, then what use can a man have of her except sex?

Feminists are Misogynists (Women Destroyed Family) - YouTube

Did this topic ever get out of hand.... OpenSoundOff • View topic - Public Safety starts with the release of names