It's not a bad idea.

Its a great idea I didn't come up with, its been kicked around for years I'm sure. Imagine if we could get it to happen and show the lesbians and the pussy whipped leaders that bow down to these feminazi's pigs, what its like not to have use around to actually get the work done.
I don't want my son and daughter raised to believe the brain washing that happens in school. I don't want to have to work for a women just because there are quotas.
I want fairness and the only way to make it happen is to let them do all the work, for a change.
I'm willing to work hard on this if there are any men that want to help and try this to see what happens.
encryptionone on skype
and here as well.

i am in

your email doesn't work---"undeliverable message"

I hate to pour cold water on your enthusiasm, guys, especially since in concept a male strike is a brilliant idea. However it is just not going to work as you envisage. Let me tell you what would happen, even if you managed to get a strike off the ground.

Firstly, about 99.99% of the female population will immediately switch into full-on innocent victim mode. They will pose as hurt and abandoned by those cruel, heartless men who refuse to do anything for them. And they will lose no opportunity to push the image of suffering children straight into the foreground. A split second later, about 98.99% of the male population will dutifully take their cue and switch into full-on chivalric hero mode, and surge to the rescue of those poor suffering women and children. You see, it's what real he-men do. Any job not being done by a striking man will be done instead by a non-striking man; and if there is any woman in need of help, it will be provided for free.

The strike will fizzle out like a damp squib; women will sing the praises of their heroic rescuers; the non-striking men will bathe in that praise in the forlorn hope that it might actually translate into a bit of pussy; and the men who went on strike will be universally condemned by women, the government and the MM (in other words the only people who matter and whose voice will be heard) as misogynists and pathetic losers.

The next day, everything will be back to normal.

This is not defeatism, it is realism. You have to get a grip of what you can do, and what you cannot do. The objective is still very real and very desirable: to impress upon an unthinking and misandric world that all the real jobs are being done by men, that without us the whole edifice would come crashing down, and that we are not the useless lumps of shit they make us out to be. But you have to choose better methods of hammering that lesson into them.

Whoops. Should explain that in my last post, I should have said MSM - main stream media. What the MM - men's movement - will think, is another matter.

It would be like those "don't buy gas on XX day" boycotts.

You still need the same amount of gas so you just buy more the day before or the day after. It's pointless.

Employers would be aware of this boycott and schedule accordingly to have the least impact, the next day...everything is back to normal. Pointless.

It's a good idea though, it's just that it has to be on a much bigger scale. I don't have the answer (outside of MGTOW) but I don't think a single day out of a year will matter much.

Quote from outdoors

your email doesn't work---"undeliverable message"

yes it works encryption1@ymail.com

Quote from paul parmenter

I hate to pour cold water on your enthusiasm, guys, especially since in concept a male strike is a brilliant idea. However it is just not going to work as you envisage. Let me tell you what would happen, even if you managed to get a strike off the ground.

Firstly, about 99.99% of the female population will immediately switch into full-on innocent victim mode. They will pose as hurt and abandoned by those cruel, heartless men who refuse to do anything for them. And they will lose no opportunity to push the image of suffering children straight into the foreground. A split second later, about 98.99% of the male population will dutifully take their cue and switch into full-on chivalric hero mode, and surge to the rescue of those poor suffering women and children. You see, it's what real he-men do. Any job not being done by a striking man will be done instead by a non-striking man; and if there is any woman in need of help, it will be provided for free.

The strike will fizzle out like a damp squib; women will sing the praises of their heroic rescuers; the non-striking men will bathe in that praise in the forlorn hope that it might actually translate into a bit of pussy; and the men who went on strike will be universally condemned by women, the government and the MM (in other words the only people who matter and whose voice will be heard) as misogynists and pathetic losers.

The next day, everything will be back to normal.

This is not defeatism, it is realism. You have to get a grip of what you can do, and what you cannot do. The objective is still very real and very desirable: to impress upon an unthinking and misandric world that all the real jobs are being done by men, that without us the whole edifice would come crashing down, and that we are not the useless lumps of shit they make us out to be. But you have to choose better methods of hammering that lesson into them.

Sorry it is defeatism, it will work if not this year then the next, or the next.
Name one event that gets worldwide coverage that is about men's rights????
There are none, this could be it. The femzillas won because they lived their beliefs, which are lies.
Ours are really, but men will not live them. That is why the lesbian left has won , SO FAR.

Quote from Garak

It would be like those "don't buy gas on XX day" boycotts.

You still need the same amount of gas so you just buy more the day before or the day after. It's pointless.

Employers would be aware of this boycott and schedule accordingly to have the least impact, the next day...everything is back to normal. Pointless.

It's a good idea though, it's just that it has to be on a much bigger scale. I don't have the answer (outside of MGTOW) but I don't think a single day out of a year will matter much.

ITS CALLED PRESS, get the message out.
Stop helping women the other 364 of the year.
I'm sure with all our contacts we could get the ball rolling now and get some great coverage whick is needed.

Quote from encryption1

ITS CALLED PRESS, get the message out.
Stop helping women the other 364 of the year.
I'm sure with all our contacts we could get the ball rolling now and get some great coverage whick is needed.

Yes the gas boycotts got press but did it change anything? NO, no one cared and if gas (which everyone uses) can't get people interested, why would this?

Quote from Garak

Yes the gas boycotts got press but did it change anything? NO, no one cared and if gas (which everyone uses) can't get people interested, why would this?

Gas is something you can't fight. Its the biggest mafia in the world.
Fighting feminist and wimpy political leaders is something that we could actually do and win.
For every bitter ripped off man, like everyone on this board, we all have brothers friends mothers fathers co-workers........ that are aware of what really goes on in society and family courts and in hiring practices. I would even be so bold as to say that we all together make up 50 % of the population.
So don't you think with a little planning and a few rules we could get a worldwide strike on the underway.
I'm getting responses already, I 'm going to get as many people here with the same info to mail it all out to friends and the media.
See if we can get a ball rolling. I'm still in

Its a good idea. I have brought the same idea up many times.

I dont understand folk who moan "but 99% of men wont take it up"...

So what?

What harm does a day off work do those who partake in it?

None, so why be defeatist about something that is so easy to do?

Will be good to play "spot the mangina"..

I had an idea too.

If 1000 MRAs sent me $1000 each, I would be a full-time organiser for the MRM for the next five years.

Pretty cheap !