I gave up waiting for the page to load.

Try this post then, Percy. Very good, especially for a lad of his young age.

The Report: Men's Rights

Cath Elliot - a feminist who regularly writes for The Guardian newspaper, has written a rude and patronising piece about Reece.

Here is the link: Sticking to the MRA script

My comment to the feminist:

I can’t help but laugh at feminists when they compare circumcision with FGM.
Why?
Well, you see, circumcision is performed in the western world where we have pain killers, santized hospital equipment and the like. FGM, on the other hand is performed in third world countries with no pain relief and no santized equipment.
However, what feminists and other variants of female supremacists seem to magically ‘forget’ somehow, is that MGM is performed in third world countries in the PRECISE same manner as FGM is performed.
How come feminists always, but always manage to ‘forget’ this fact?

What Cath Elliot does is very typical of feminists, she ridicules any idea of men getting treated equally, then plays the victim role, absolutely pitiful, but I wouldn't take anything seriously that the fat flabby-arsed ugly whore says about a 16 year old young man, I mean just look at her tags, the stuff of a 6 year old.

a bit of politics · everyone point and laugh at the MRAs · feminism · health · misogyny · parenting · rape · the Internet · what? · you really couldn't make this shit up

I read it but I don't recall any mention of rape, maybe I'm wrong, but why the "rape" tag?

First, a big thank you for posting the report. It was so much more helpful than having to go to the site and wait for a loading when one has crap internet service and a wood-fired computer.

Second, young Reece gets 9/10 for his efforts, which is damned good for a 16 y/o and gives encouragement for better to come.

It should be noted that Hague was just a lad when he made a big stir at a Tory Party conference being outspoken and blunt and quietly reading the Riot Act to the old fogies.

I think Reece asked some pertinent questions although frankly the circumcision one was trivial. I know it occupies the minds of some MRAs but could never understand why it occupies so much when there are far more cutting matters.

He also needed to get his facts 'exactly' right (Minister for Women) and provided Mr Hague with far more detailed statistics on a variety of matters. They are available on the net as we know all too well.

Mr Hague gave some gratuitous expression of attitude which could have been followed through; for example on mothers being the better choice for having the children after divorce. That could have been followed by a supplementary question as to why Mr Hague thought that and what his 'evidence' was.

But, all in all, it does show some movement in the MRM and an awareness growing in our youthful members. Their's is the furture and young Reece shows that a polite and well presented young chap can get the ear of a senior politician and excite the ire of journalists. And he does us all a service by presenting his report for all to see.

the heartening and significant fact here is that a young man of 16 has discarded the intensive brainwashing of his edification and is thinking objectively about the feminit shell trick and sees the adverse skewed nature of feminitism and its raft of lies as it impacts for the worse on all men

Cath Elliot said:

To the MRAs who’ve been directed here from Anti-misandry com and other places.

If you’ve got something to add to the discussion your comments will be published. If you just want to hurl abuse, or rant about female supremacists and femnazis, you may as well just fuck off now.

If you’ve got something to add to the discussion your comments will be published.

I can't believe this, I'm not taking the word of a fat flabby-arsed woman who ridicules and mocks a 16 year old young man whose only want is equality, he has not suggested women "lose out" in any way, just that men be treated as fairly as women, he's not exactly asking for much, yet this vile specimen mocks the young guy? She's a fucking cretin, and I doubt there would be a man who would write such bile about a young woman who only wanted to be treated fairly, she's a disgusting pig who, strangely enough, looks like an extremely ugly gay man who is riddled with AIDS, how unfortunate for her scabby arse, looking like that she'll be unable to land a man or a woman, even a repulsive one.

Quote from 6ame

I can't believe this, I'm not taking the word of a fat flabby-arsed woman who ridicules and mocks a 16 year old young man whose only want is equality, he has not suggested women "lose out" in any way, just that men be treated as fairly as women, he's not exactly asking for much, yet this vile specimen mocks the young guy? She's a fucking cretin, and I doubt there would be a man who would write such bile about a young woman who only wanted to be treated fairly, she's a disgusting pig who, strangely enough, looks like an extremely ugly gay man who is riddled with AIDS, how unfortunate for her scabby arse, looking like that she'll be unable to land a man or a woman, even a repulsive one.

The sentence you opened with above- I agree with you there.

Quote from 6ame

I can't believe this, I'm not taking the word of a fat flabby-arsed woman who ridicules and mocks a 16 year old young man whose only want is equality, he has not suggested women "lose out" in any way, just that men be treated as fairly as women, he's not exactly asking for much, yet this vile specimen mocks the young guy? She's a fucking cretin, and I doubt there would be a man who would write such bile about a young woman who only wanted to be treated fairly, she's a disgusting pig who, strangely enough, looks like an extremely ugly gay man who is riddled with AIDS, how unfortunate for her scabby arse, looking like that she'll be unable to land a man or a woman, even a repulsive one.

I share your anger... This young man is just concerned with fairness, as you say. It's sad - to put it very lightly - that many women, including this one who mocks him, think they MUST attack anybody who just wants some fairness and opposes their ridiculous sexist views on society (equivalent to the femminist word 'patriarchy').
He does not deserves to be met with such crap for standing for standing up for some justice and fairness, especially not from lowlifes as the above mentioned womyn.

Good for that youngster and us....

I remember previous reading one of Reece's letters to a newspaper, it was obvious then he had great potential.

As others have said, it's great that people like him can see through all the feminist lies and are genuinely intersted in equality. He does of course have the benefit of a media which no longer totally ignores MRA issues as in the past, yet at the same time he's grown up at a time when gender feminists progdanga and political power is at it's greatest. Thus he's come to his excellent conclusions despite the millions spent attempting to brainwash him by the dv industry, despite our feminist education system and despite all the constant lies of this government on feminists and MRA issue (there was yet anotehr huge one exposed just last week in terms of people trafficking).

Reece of course is very lucky in that he's under 18. This means he's still got a short amount of time left where he can get special treatment and a more friendly approach from politicians and the media as he still isn't officially quite one of us evil men yet. He's effectively got the same privileges available to women and it's very obvious they don't like him making use of them.

I disagree with others stating he shouldn't have rasied the circumsision issue. Yes in some ways it isn't as serious an other issues, but in many other ways it is a very powerful tool and it is clearly something that should have a much higher profile. There aren't liekly to be many changes to the law yet on it, but you have to start somewhere and if nothing else it really is just about the best and easiest way to make feminists look even more hypercritical than normal.

I also found the report very well written although the site hosting it was a bit slow.

Criticisms

My only real criticism would be of question two:

Questions one and two were basically about the same thing. I can think of a good 10 key MRA issues which politicians need to urgently address so we should never repeat ourselves. Further still, the question was quite political in that it dealt with winning votes etc. IMO it's best to just state the facts as they are and highlight the huge inequalities and discrimination men face. Most MRA issues aren't vote winners yet which is why they always get ignored and why men are in such a terrible position today in terms of equality.

Haugue's Responses

Not really very impressed with much of what he said, a typical politician really. i think the worst responses were on the cancer/health issue.

He did at least compliment Reece in terms of his concerns about circumsision which was good. The only really promising aspects were his reponses to the last question and his promises to chase up Harman.

Concucisions

I think the fact some feminist idiot has already chosen to blog about Reece says it all really. It shows they are already running scared, so there's clearly a lot of potential here.

Who votes with me that Frostyboy invites young Reece here to participate and widen his learnings?