this list has been making the rounds...................Kim the main problem is that too many pople like bill and will vote for her cuse they think of it as kinda a third term for him

VOTE RON PAUL

Thanks for that one Kim, I'm gonna steal it if you don't mind....

Thanks for that Kim.

Bet we were all second-guessing before you revealed the answer.

Recently I've been having some good-natured arguments with an American ex-pat mate about Ronald Reagan. I could never understand why he's so admired when he appeared to be a moron.

My friend sent me some info, not from his speeches but about private life, diary writings etc. I quickly began to realise that this was perhaps a smart man who played dumb in order to get the masses on his side.

Hitlery Klingon on the other hand is .................

You has your vote an' you takes your choice.

I agree that Hillary is not much better than Bush.

As evidence that Bush takes his inspiration from Orwell's 1984

War Is Peace

* US Congressman Charlie Rangel has been arguing for a return of military conscription (“The Draft”) as—so he tells the public— a way of reducing war.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...51C1A9649C8B63


* It's not easy to capture someone killed the year before—until you harness the power of Ingsoc. When you've got Ingsoc on your side, though, it's so easy that the US did it again.

http://www.thememoryhole.org/war/kha...surrection.htm
http://beta.morons.org/tally-ho/article/read/3836


* In order to fight terrorism, we must cause it, says Donald Rumsfeld.

http://www.counterpunch.org/floyd1101.html


* Just like in 1984's Room 101, the Miniluv operations in Guantánamo Bay were authorized to “exploit[] a prisoner's phobias, sometimes using muzzled dogs in interrogations.” Doubleplusgood!

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/22/po...rtner=USERLAND


* According to the Bush administration, the Duelfer report which conclusively showed that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq actually justifies the war in Iraq.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/07/po...er=rssuserland



* “I just want you to know that, when we talk about war, we're really talking about peace.” — George W. Bush, 43rd President of the United States


* “Protecting [an] Islamic cultural center” involves fighting a war inside it, as the New York Times on the Web shows.

http://www.studentsfororwell.org/yarr/falluja



You can find more examples of where Bush gets his inspiration from Orwell here:

http://www.studentsfororwell.org/

This is the problem in elections around the world. Both your candidates are owned. It's like that Simpson's episode where the aliens replace both the Republican and Democratic candidates with their own. Both candidates are almost indistinguishable on the issues, and finally the pair are unmasked. The aliens then ask the people of Springfield what choice they have - will they waste their vote on a third party candidate or vote for one of the aliens? Reluctantly, the people of Springfield state that rather than waste their vote, they would have to vote for one of the aliens that would enslave them and beat them over the heads with boards. Sadly, this is the prevailing mentality and is all too close to the reality of the situation that Americans face.

Hillary though is far worse than Bush. While Bush and his cabal would work to establish a new world order, it would be of a branch that would put US interests first. Hillary on the other hand would establish a new world order which would put European interests first. She would turn the United States into a communist country, as her statements above confirm. Each and everyone of her statements smacks of communist philosophy and could easily have been made by any of the communist icons listed.

Quote from TheSharpenedPen

This is the problem in elections around the world. Both your candidates are owned. It's like that Simpson's episode where the aliens replace both the Republican and Democratic candidates with their own. Both candidates are almost indistinguishable on the issues, and finally the pair are unmasked. The aliens then ask the people of Springfield what choice they have - will they waste their vote on a third party candidate or vote for one of the aliens? Reluctantly, the people of Springfield state that rather than waste their vote, they would have to vote for one of the aliens that would enslave them and beat them over the heads with boards. Sadly, this is the prevailing mentality and is all too close to the reality of the situation that Americans face.

Hillary though is far worse than Bush. While Bush and his cabal would work to establish a new world order, it would be of a branch that would put US interests first. Hillary on the other hand would establish a new world order which would put European interests first. She would turn the United States into a communist country, as her statements above confirm. Each and everyone of her statements smacks of communist philosophy and could easily have been made by any of the communist icons listed.

I think they are about the same. Bush claims to be for freedom and democracy but his actions speak otherwise. Whereas Hillary does not claim to be for freedom and democracy.

When I was growing up I was always told to pay attention to what a person DOES, not what he says.

Quote from elzoog

I think they are about the same. Bush claims to be for freedom and democracy but his actions speak otherwise. Whereas Hillary does not claim to be for freedom and democracy.

When I was growing up I was always told to pay attention to what a person DOES, not what he says.

Hillary is a voracious man-hater and communist sellout. Trust me, as bad as Bush is, Hillary will be far, far worse.

Thanks for that one Kim, I'm gonna steal it if you don't mind....

Steal away, Karl.

Hillary is a voracious man-hater and communist sellout. Trust me, as bad as Bush is, Hillary will be far, far worse.

You'd be hard pressed to come up with a politician I consider 'as bad as' Hillary. Even if I equally despised their politics, atleast they don't cry "they're picking on me because I'm a woman!", when their political agendas are challenged during a debate. If I'd had any respect for Hillary (which I didn't) before that, it would have long since disappeared.

If I HAD to have a liberal feminist woman president it would be maxine waters