All Blog Entries

Nothing like a women imagining scorn is there ?


Grandmother accused of hacking husband to death with machete


By Tristan Swanwick
November 19, 2008




A GRANDMOTHER hacked her 71-year-old husband to death with a machete because she thought he was seeing other women, a court has been told.

Kamalavati Sundar, 70, pleaded not guilty in the Supreme Court jury in Brisbane today to murdering her husband Ram as he slept in their Woodridge home in December 2005.
Mr Sundar was found lying face-down in bed with at least 14 machete wounds to his head and the top of his arms, prosecutor Angus Edwards told the court, the Courier-Mail reports.

Mr Edwards said the couple appeared to have a happy and loving marriage apart from Mrs Sundar's "jealous streak".

"On the night of the killing it all came to a head," he said.

After a family gathering at the couple's home, Mrs Sundar accused her husband of having an affair with his grandson's maternal grandmother, Mr Edwards said.

He told the jury the Fijian-born man went to bed after telling his wife he intended to leave her because of her constant accusations of infidelity.

"Mr Sundar didn't get the chance to do that because he never woke up."
The trial before Justice Peter Dutney continues.

Oh look, here we have the feminists dream female. A lesbian that is of the opinion that she is above the law. But I AM A WOMAN, this should be an automatic excuse for bad behaviour (a similar episode happened in Australia a while back when a WOMAN after murdering her husband, cook his remains in a stew and proceeded to serve him for supper to the kids, she made the same demand). She demanded to be released because she was a WOMAN. It's on my blog somewhere, I cannot be bothered..

Has anyone heard anything more ridiculous in their life ?

Automatic discount for the privileged sex..

I am rather amazed at this comment as it actually condemns another WOMAN to accountability, amazing..

"Parliament has said that, if you're going to engage in this sort of thing, you'd better not do it with children because you'll have no legal defence," he said.

I wonder what type of abuse he is getting for making that comment ?

But do not fear, here we have the standard "she is a victim" comment..

Whew, I thought it was too good ?

"It cannot have been Parliament's intention that such persons be branded paedophile for life."

Not for females anyway..

A LESBIAN pornographer will remain a convicted paedophile after the country's highest court refused to erase her criminal history.
The High Court today refused Rebecca Jane Clarke's application for special leave to appeal against her conviction for making six pornographic films with two 14-year-old girls, the Advertiser reports.
The decision means the 23-year-old, from Goulburn in New South Wales, will likely never achieve her dream of working as a counsellor for disadvantaged children.

Solicitor-General Martin Hinton QC told the court that was a consequence of Clarke's poor life choices.

"Parliament has said that, if you're going to engage in this sort of thing, you'd better not do it with children because you'll have no legal defence," he said.
"The consequences, albeit severe, don't change the fact the decision (to convict) was right."

Clarke – who says "I feel like a child molester" and "your breasts feel like a 10-year-old's" during the films – is serving a two-year good-behaviour bond for producing child pornography and inciting an indecent act.
She and her co-accused – Renee Jean Malyschko and Daniel Troy Osis – made a DVD of six movies, with the teenage girls, in 2005.
At her trial, Clarke said she "honestly believed" the girls were 17, comparing their physiques to Calista Flockheart and the Olsen twins.

In December 2007, the District Court ruled that defence did not exist in law.

Today Adam Richards, for Clarke, challenged that ruling.

"The law, as written, also catches the person who has been lied to, who honestly believes something is lawful, who has made a mistake," he said.

"It cannot have been Parliament's intention that such persons be branded paedophile for life."

The High Court, however, ruled there was insufficient reason for it to interfere with the original ruling.

As you all know life in FEMINAZI HEREFORD aint good.Over the last few months things haven't got any better as such, however i had an idea, as i'm being persecuted i thought i would contact my locall Hereford councillor, as my issues are concerning feminist's employed by Hereford Council, she started to argue with me.Well i don't tollerate any shit" so i put the phone down on her.
I have tried to contact Councillor George Phillips, (He is in charge of the councillors) he has refused to have anything to do with me, it appears i'm no longer a constituent of Hereford and no coucillor wants to help me in Hereford, even though i'm entitled to help.

Im loosing my patience now and i can see that a protest will be taking place in the near future.
Anybody willing to help, get in touch".

Out of a Hundred Rapes only 10% happened..

This is where it's at..90% are lies..

Where are they, in jail for false allegation ? Dream on..

Women know they can scream "RAPE" and everyone listens but no one checks..

It's a known fact that women will use false rape claims to seek revenge and no one checks..

Women know that revenge is the sweetest act but no one checks..

Ever wonder why the rape statistics according to the feminists is such an epidemic..

No ONE CHECKS..

A question..

Originally posted by M&MBM

Do you think that real rape victims are less likely to report their ordeal than say, someone using the police as a means of revenge/punishment/assuagement of guilt for allowing things to go too far? And do you find that the false allegations come from the same type of person, or is it something all types of people do?
Does it jaundice your view of all victims?

What can be done to make sure that true victims still have the courage to come forward, but these vengeful types are discouraged? Cases like this? or do we have to put up with the dross to allow the true victims to feel safe about coming forward?

The response..

Most definitely but i'm professional enough to treat it as gospel until a dedicated sexual offences officer arrives.
This is why I think sentencing for false claims should be far higher...we've all read about the boy who cried wolf.

I fully agree with the above sentiment, out of the 100's of rapes and sexual assaults I can probably count on one hand the amount that were genuine.

Meanwhile we have a police officer stating the obvious and not one bureaucrat wants to know and no one checks..

Met Tec

I daresay I've been involved in 100 rape enquiries over the years. And I cannot imagine a worse crime to be a victim of.
Of the hundred I've looked at, I reckon about ten actually happened.
If a Senior Officer say's he got there by hard work, ask him "Who's?"

Oh and it's better, bear in mind it's Police Officers having this discussion..

Rape..........So easy to alledge, and extremly difficult to prove/disprove.
Like Met-tec above, I've been involved in scores over my 30 yrs, conviction rate , well that was very low. The reasons being are that if there is forensic/DNA then the accused will answer "Consentual sex", that is the bigest reason for Juries to aquit. One on One allegations and the CPS will decide insufficient evidence to proceed on the evidential test, even b4 they get to the public interest test. There are IMHO more victims who are cheated of Justice because of the burdens of proof then there are of perpetrators convicted.

And here is more demonstration that feminists are not a bunch of women with superiority complexes... Yeah, right!




Located here: http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/;_ylt=A...&sid=396545307

Did you know that Satan is a man?
I've shown myself to you cuz I've got a little plan.

We'll execute some rich important people, topple all the churches, burn down the fucking steeples.

Fuck the law, fuck the law-man, no decent person trades their brain in for a badge. If you can't hear me it's cuz your head is up their ass.

You can't think, blind from the stink, the rotting shit aroma of modern society. Your buying two, get the next one free, the "civilized" all feed off greed and curiosity.

Boys in blue enforce your mental slavery, indentured servitude to superfluous luxury.

Hang'em down low, hang'em up high,
let's gather up the piggies so they're fucking crucified.

Don't frown, turn that cross upside down, go grab a baseball bat and let's go to fucking town.

I was thinking recently of how different things would be if..

Men did not have to ask the government for a court order and permission to see their kids following relationship breakup and mothers denying access..

Imagine this..

The law is changed to the effect that..

Parents are given the right (as is natural) to spend as much time as they wish with their kids.

Anyone who seeks to prevent this, by any means, has no right to do so..

A father will no longer be arrested for attempting to visit his kids..

A mother, or anyone else, who interferes with a father visiting his kids, shall have to explain herself to the satisfaction of firstly the father (and that should be enough) and secondly should the father not accept her excuse, to the police who will immediately arrest her until she presents a good reason for her denial of her childs paternal influence..

I think this system would work VERY NICELY!!

It would also put a lot of lawyers and state sector parasites out of work..:)

Origins of a Mad Dad and injustice

Mad Dad, usually a misandric term used within feminine diatribe, has greater and as of yet unexplored origin, and within this definition we find the freedom to exonerate Fathers. The following is offered for reflection with no commentary. Written by Plato, statements attributed (by Plato) to Adeimantus and Glaucon (citation follows below). Thanks given, by Bob van Ee, to friends at Slate and Fray for the very timely reminder.

Adeimantus talking with Glaucon about Justice

[Adeimantus] Do you want our conviction that right action is in all circumstances better than wrong to be genuine or merely apparent?
[Glaucon]…And now for my first heading, the nature and origin of justice. What they say is that it is according to nature a good thing to inflict wrong or injury, and a bad thing to suffer it, but that the disadvantages of suffering exceed the advantages of inflicting it; after a taste of both, therefore, men decide that, as can’t evade the one and achieve the other, it will pay to make a compact with each other by which they forgo both. They accordingly proceed to make laws and mutual agreements, and what the law lays down they call lawful and right. This is the origin and nature of justice. It lies between what is most desirable, to do wrong and avoid punishment, and what is most undesirable, to suffer wrong without being able to get redress; justice lies between these two and is accepted not as being good in itself, but as having a relative value due to our inability to do wrong. For anyone who had the power to do wrong and was a real man would never make any such agreement with anyone – he would be mad if he did.

(Plato, trans. 1955)
(Desmond Lee)
Lee, D. (reprinted and revised 1987)103-104 Plato the Republic Penguin Books Ltd, London, England [ISBN 0-14-044048-8]

This is from the ongoing wiki wars when we win a defnition I will post that, then. If some links are broken do not be surprised if some work now but not later do not be surprised: this is very much a necessary work in progress.
Power and Control


Power and control is a concept used in discussions of inter-personal relationships. Most often it is explained with a graphic Power and Control Wheel. The original Power and Control Wheel described Power and Control as an oppressive condition experienced by women. Designed as propaganda, the Power and Control Wheel was never subjected to Peer Review and comment. The Power and Control over women wheel as been widely distributed and is found in government manuals, therapists offices, popular and professional press. The Power and Control over Women Wheel has been used in conjunction with political campaigns such as DV (Domestic Violence) and VAWA (Violence against Women Act). The Power and Control Wheel over males is a peer reviewed piece expressing manners and methods in which females might seek advantage over males in inter-personal relationships.
Power and control as issues within relationships are akin to influence. As economics deals with a scarcity of resources, and the allocation therein, human inter-personal relationships are in a constant flux, to some degree or another, with each participant seeking to advance their perceptions. Please see “power” at { [[8]]} and “control” at {[[9]]}.
Related references
Interpersonal relationships: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpersonal_relationships
Family: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family
Husband and Wife: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Husband_and_wife
Households: Household - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Power and Control over females
The Power and Control over Women Wheel [3], is a graphic with text inserted. The graphic has an outer ring with wedges pointing to the inner ring. Repeated twice, at the top and bottom of the outer ring are the words: violence, physical and sexual. The inner circle bears the words: Power and Control. The wedges are headed by the words: Using intimidation, Using emotional abuse, Using isolation, Minimizing, denying, blaming, Using children, Using male privilege, Using economic abuse. Text under the wedge or category headers explains the conditions.
USING COERCION AND THREATS: Making and/or carrying out threats to something to hurt her • threatening to leave her or commit suicide, to report her to welfare • making her drop charges • making her do illegal things.
USING INTIMIDATION: Making her afraid by using looks, actions, gestures • smashing things • destroying her property • abusing pets • displaying weapons.
USING EMOTIONAL ABUSE: Putting her down • making her feel bad about herself • calling her names • making her think she’s crazy • playing mind games • humiliating her • making her feel guilty.
USING ISOLATION: Controlling what she does, who she sees and talks to, what she reads, where she goes • limiting her outside involvement • using jealously to justify actions.
MINIMIZING, DENYING, AND BLAMING: Making light of the abuse and not taking her concerns about it seriously • saying the abuse didn’t happen • shifting responsibility for abusive behavior • saying she caused it.
USING CHILDREN: Making her feel guilty about the children • using the children to relay messages • using visitation to harass her • threatening to take the children away.
USING MALE PRIVILEGE: Treating her like a servant • making all the big decisions • acting like the ‘master of the castle’ • being the one to define men’s and women’s roles.
USING ECONOMIC ABUSE: Preventing her from getting or keeping a job • making her ask for money • giving her an allowance • taking her money • not letting her know about or have access to the family finances.

Circa 1970 radical feminists (please see [[1]] for an evolving definition of Feminism} usurped control of the women’s rights movement and engaged in diatribe and propaganda {please see [[2]for word definition}] to gain exclusive advantage for females in America. An original propaganda tool was the Power and Control Wheel which is neither peer reviewed or empirical. Most notably obnoxious in the first Power and Control Wheel is the Economic Portion denying budgets {please see [[4]] for budget definition} as a relevant family finance tool. Power and Control has been used since 1970 to argue for feminine advantage. Psychological Counselors and Masters of Social Work (MSWs) have frequently used the original propaganda to mold inter family relationships, family finances, perceptions (or the allegations thereof) of reality. Please read {[[5]] and { [[6]] } to better understand that there are opposing points of view related to this subject.
Original Power and Control Wheel History
The original propaganda was published on mimeographed ...