A feminist said so, so it must be true. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...040AA9Ive5&r=w
Yesterday afternoon while watching the tv i had a knock at the front door, three police officers stood their wanting to arrest me. The police officer said i was under arrest for harassing my neighbour who has been making false allegations since 2006. Every complaint that i have reported to the police, she has put in a false allegation to counter act it. Today i asked a police officer why has she not been arrested for what she has being doing to me. The police officer wouldn't answer'.
So as of yesterday afternoon i have decided enough is enough and have started a hunger strike. I have taken this stance in response to being arrested on FALSE ALLEGATIONS.
I wish you all well for the future and hope things get better for men!
[FONT=Arial Black][SIZE=3]This is the predicament for me.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial Black][SIZE=3]I love women. I absolutely adore them. I love the fact that they are willing to get as silly as men do, and seem to have as much of a blast as us XY humans. I love that they try hard to make us feel better when we're down. I love the way they smell, the smoothness of their skin, the way it seems that their eyes are larger and prettier than men's.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial Black][SIZE=3]Too bad feminism has destroyed my long held love for women. I cannot get a fair break from many of them. I'm damned if I do, damned if I don't. I miss women.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial Black][SIZE=3]To women who are reading this, I'm refering to radical feminists, not ladies such as yourselves. You have done no harm to me:). But because of the unreasonable demands placed upon me by various girlfriends, I chose to be celibate and not date. THIS IS NOT EASY:D. But there is no alternative, save prostitutes, one night stands, masturbation and flagellating myself in a closet with a bloody scourge:rolleyes:[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial Black][SIZE=3]I want to be with a woman, but I'm not willing to be ass-fucked by another vindictive female. It's unfair to put all women under the same umbrella statement, so I'm sorry for that. My hope is that my attitude will change with time, and I believe that discussions on boards like this will be a tremendous help.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial Black][SIZE=3]Best Wishes,[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial Black][SIZE=3]Jon (RookRoost)[/SIZE][/FONT]
Quote from genisis I love LADIES" but i can't stand FEMINIST'S. I can pick them out quite quickly, i don't like the way that they try to and undermine my intelligence. I get annoyed and they get to hate me for my attitude!!!
Quote from Dr David Banner I know of a University in the UK running a course for women how to manage men. The language is unbelievebaly patronising and the misandry is further promoted by resident fembot lecturers.
A course in feminism that makes out there are many different kinds of feminism and so you must not pigeon hole feminism its acomplex philosophy and here are some choice feminist quotes: What kind of feminist are these?:
“I've never met a man I couldn't kill -- Lydia Lunch”
“Sex is the cross on which women are crucified ... Sex can only be adequately defined as universal rape. -- Hodee Edwards, ‘
"Rape defines Sex ”
“Can you imagine a world without men? ... Nicole Hollander (‘Sylvia’)” "I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them." -- Robin Morgan, MS. Magazine Editor
"Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometime gain from the experience," said Catherine Comins, Vassar College Assistant Dean of Student Life in Time.
"A good part-and definitely the most fun part-of being a feminist is about frightening men." --Julie Burchill (b. 1960), British journalist, author. Time Out (London, 16 Nov. 1989).
"In order to raise children with equality, we must take them away from families and communally raise them." (Dr. Mary Jo Bane, feminist and assistant professor of education at Wellesley College and associate director of the school's Center for Research on Woman). “So many men, so little ammunition.”
“The way to a man's heart is through his chest.”
Imagine if any of this was taught about any other group including animals!!!....and the authors of such statements studied at university
-unthinkable isnt it?
""""In order to raise children with equality, we must take them away from families and communally raise them.""""""
here these manhaters who consider themselves academics give their definition of "equality" folk !!
nothing that Noah Webster would include in his lexicon
the feminit definition is of the
Global Village" ilk proposed by the misspoke hillary - that is communism
feminits are like the Borg otta Star Trek that is they are one of seven or one of a billion but all the same misadric brain based on a well founded eny of men's natural ability to achieve and gets things done
Quote from outdoors Anger in Action: The politics of “fathers’ rights” in Canada May 1, 2009 in Briarpatch Articles, May/June 2009: Crime & punishment by dave | 7 comments http://briarpatchmagazine.com/2009/05/01/fathers-rights-in-canada By Deanna Ogle Briarpatch Magazine May/June 2009 I first heard about fathers’ rights groups when I was working at a Vancouver drop-in centre for women several years ago. A family law advocate for a similar organization in a neighbouring community told me about a group of men who would show up at court in matching T-shirts to support male members of their organization who were engaged in custody and access disputes with their ex-partners. The groups would do this to try to influence the judges and intimidate the women, who were often there without a lawyer or any other support besides the advocate. Concerned, I wondered how organized these men were and if it was a local phenomenon. To my surprise, I learned that this group was part of a global movement with a membership ranging from Caribbean Canadian Senator Anne Cools to British anti-poverty activist Bob Geldof (though the vast majority of fathers’ rights leaders and activists are white, middle-class, conservative men). There is a diversity of thought and tactics to fathers’ rights groups, but they share a focus on issues of family law - in particular, issues surrounding custody and access to children. Organizations like Fathers 4 Justice, Fathers are Capable Too, Canadian Equal Parenting Council, Dads Canada and Equal Parenting BC have adopted the language of “equal rights” and resistance to oppression, but wield these terms in defence of traditional ideas of fatherhood and male privilege. Although fathers’ rights groups have existed in Canada since the 1970s, it wasn’t until the mid-1990s that they began to emerge as an influential voice in divorce and child custody proceedings. In 1998 a Special Joint Committee on Child Custody and Access was convened to consult with individuals and communities across Canada on proposed changes to the Divorce Act. This committee included allies of the fathers’ rights movement such as Senator Anne Cools and committee co-chair Roger Galloway, then a Liberal MP for Sarnia Lambton. Although this consultation process was widely considered a failure (the resulting report was not adopted by the Justice Minister and none of the recommendations of the committee were adopted), it did highlight how family law has become the staging ground for a heated struggle around gender norms in modern families. With strong support from within the committee, the consultation process became a platform for fathers’ groups to air their grievances with the current system. In particular they called for “equal shared parenting” and increasing non-custodial parents’ rights. In Canadian law there are two forms of equality that are commonly discussed, formal equality and substantive equality. A strict “formal equality” approach demands that everyone is treated exactly the same regardless of mitigating circumstances. At first glance, this approach sounds reasonable as it would allow a father’s grievance in the courts to be given equal airing to that of the mother. However, this “gender neutral” approach obscures the substantially different ways the men and women experience separation, divorce and the justice system. While experiences of divorce and separation vary, many women find that the end of a relationship means a new life of precarity, lower income (if not complete loss of income) and single motherhood. While poverty rates among women before divorce are 16 per cent, after divorce these rates increase dramatically to 43 per cent. This drop in socio-economic status coupled with decreases in government support for family law legal aid in many areas of Canada means that women are often unable to access adequate legal representation or advice in family law matters like custody and access. This situation is especially serious for women who are leaving abusive relationships, disabled women and newcomers who face barriers to accessing the legal system due to limited English language skills and unfamiliarity with our legal institutions. Not having access to legal advice means that these women are less likely to be able to present their arguments within legal language, and are therefore less likely to be taken seriously by the judge or mediator. This is where substantive equality comes in. Substantive equality accounts for these patterns of discrimination and oppression in an effort to guarantee equality not just of opportunity but of outcomes. Basically, substantive equality recognizes that we don’t all start at the same place due to structures of privilege and oppression,
This evening I took my normal nightly walk with my neighbor's son, Peter. Peter is mentally disabled and in our "tolerant" lefty land, no one else will go anywhere with him unless, that is, they are paid too by the local authority. We wandered happily around the streets chatting and looking at things of interest as we always do. Walking down one street I noticed, sitting in someones front garden, the strangest looking contraption I had ever seen. It was bright orange, tall with a small canopy on the top of a single steel rod projecting upwards from the back of it. It had, what appeared to be a little seat on it and it also looked like it might be motor driven. I stopped and stared at it, wondering what it could be. Unable to figure it out, we walked on. I had barely reached the path leading to the front door of the house when the said front door opened and a bleached blond, slim woman appeared with a young man. What followed was disgusting but also, typical of life on a British housing estate.
Woman to young man: "What are they f****** lookin' at? Are they looking at the kids through the winda? Those two are paedophiles. They live 'round the corner."
Young man to woman: "They f****** better stay away from here then."
The young man then walked quickly towards us. I stopped and looked him in the eye. He was a typical young man. Clueless. Not very bright and obviously easily riled up. Skinny. I knew I could flatten him by breathing too heavily. I waited until he was in front of me and then said, in a friendly but firm voice, "Alright mate? What's up?"
His aggression vanished in an instant fog of confusion. Paedo's are not supposed to act like this. He walked past me and stopped a little way behind me. I transferred my gaze to the bleached blond standing like a whorehouse madam on the doorstep and bristling with that new female aggression so beloved of the Spice Girls and so responsible for so many battered wife stories in the media. She glared back at me. Drunk on her feeling of illusionary power and her eyes pumped full of the hate the self righteous always carry about with them. You know the sort of thing. You can see it in the faces of the politically correct. I spoke out.
"I was looking at that." I said. Pointing to the orange contraption. "And wondering what the heck it is."
She looked as confused as the young man had.
"Oh." She said. "You mean the trolley." Then added, weakly. "I thought you were being nosey." I spotted how "nosey" had replaced the "paedophile" accusation now that she could see her man friend had lost his nerve. I said, "It's OK lady. No weirdos here." She scuttled back inside followed by her plastic hero. I imagine she felt really "strong" and "liberated" as she sat on her sofa this evening, glued to the nightly mind mashing mush the TV spews out.
As we walked away I reflected on the incident and smiled. Earlier in the day I had seen another young thug trying to impress some thugetts, who ran up behind me in a threatening manner after I had looked disapprovingly at him because he was standing on top of a large pump house erected by a local supermarket, screaming, "Let's go f****** mental!" only to skulk away when I turned to face him and he saw I was not afraid.
Labours Britain huh?
Here's the thing: If those "hard men" had known me 25 years ago they would not have dared to have acted like that around me. In fact, had one of those cheap tarts and her dopey boyfriend accused me then of being a child molester, I would have petrol bombed their house after making sure they had both suffered a lot of pain first. Back then, if you did not respect me, I made you respect me. I was a worse prospect than any of today's plastic gangsters roaming the streets of our estates could ever know. Extreme violence and I were closely acquainted and fools like them were never tolerated. These people exist today because of the left wing claptrap about making everyone into a victim and the other rubbish about not disciplining children. The result has been an entire two generations of feral children have been brought up without respect for their elders and with the ability to whine about their "rights" when one of those elders fights back. A nation, once proud of its gutsy men and women, is being turned into a haunt for the gutless. Just like their leaders in the House of Commons.
It is easy for the likes of Harriet Harman to stand behind her police protection squad and with all of the power of the state in her hands, make statements about how, if she had her way, men would leave the country in droves. Like the kids today, she has no respect for anyone. She is a coward hiding behind the
MRAs beware Men Against Sexism – NOMAS, conference to end sexual assault, Portland Oregon State University, Oct. 28 – 30, 2009, as described in the Google Banner Leads above and below, here at AM. NOMAS: Pro-feminist, gay-affirmative, anti-racist, enhancing men’s lives (NOMAS | Pro-feminist, gay affirmative, anti-racist, enhancing men's lives.).
[B]Frank Lampard[/B] has split up with the mother of his two daughters. This was enough of a reason for a BBC radio presenter to label him as "scum." Frank did not take this lying down. He called the station and had a go at the idiot who insulted him. Let's show our support for him by also leaving messages with the BBC radio station concerned.
To hear Frank's fight back, Go here : [URL]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8017456.stm[/URL]
To read a full transcript go here: [URL]http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/news/frank-lampards-call-to-lbc-the-full-transcript-1673885.html[/URL]
To complain to the radio station Go here: [URL]http://www.lbc.co.uk/on-air-complaints--feedback-3491[/URL]
My own little complain is reproduced below. Come on people, lets fight back! Start by [passing this along your contact list. If you have a face book account etc, please use it to gather more support. (I closed mine). Get your friends and family to lodge their complaints also. Show these idiots that we are not going to take this crap anymore.
Failing that, do nothing.
"The only "scum" in the Frank Lampard affair are the people that called him scum on the radio. These BBC robots parroting their lefty, gender specific, feminist claptrap need to be hauled in. We, the public, are sick of hearing it. Keep your nasty little opinions to yourself and stop trying to brainwash all of us into having the same small minded attitudes you lot carry. You have no idea of the pain Frank Lampard is going through or the circumstances he is enduring. You do not know who is at fault but you choose, as always, to blame the man. Shut up and keep your silly political nonsense to yourselves. You just make yourselves sound stupid and if you think you are influencing those not already corrupted by your lefty propaganda, think again."
Repentance is the destruction of false love (that love of sin) so that true Love (that Love for God) may be born.
Last week in my car driving to a petrol station i passed a feminist neighbour i just ignored her. Coming back up the road i had to pass her again, this time she started putting up finger jesters at me, i stop the car and phoned the police, she was subsequently spoken to at her home address.
This morning i had a man banging at my front door, i asked who it was' he said he was a police officer so i opend the door and asked for identification he had none. This man then started accusing me off harassing the neighbour who was spoken to in the week. So i slamned the door he started shouting through my letter box, as this is going on i'm on the phone to the police, they tell me he is not a police officer but someone pretending.
This pretend Pc then climbed onto my lawn and started looking in on my property.
So guys if any of you know of a good solicitor, i'am prepared to travel as long as i can get legal aid for harassment, i need some help".
Ps I thought pretending to be a police officer was a criminal offence, well West Mercia Police have said they won't do anything about this issue.
Maybe NF4J should pretend to be police officers at least in West Mercias area of policing.
Ps got a letter today from plod, it contains all false allegations of harassment, so i phoned plod up and enquired about the letter quoting plod collar number from letter. I'm now told my pretend Pc was indeed a police officer, but with no identification" at the time!!!!
Updated 25th-April-2009 at 09:11 PM by genisis (More information to add".)