Greetings!! Is this your first visit? If so, please consider registering. It enables downloads and removal of adverts. Use the 'facebook connect' for quick access.
View RSS Feed

All Blog Entries

  1. A challenge for you, while I kill some time :P

    by , 13th-May-2011 at 09:52 PM (Rise of the Zeta Male)
    Finals are this week. I only plan on making 1 blog post this week. However, I plan to show some other content on my FB page. One thing I plan on doing also is creating an "Intro to Men's Rights" window people can click on and see a lot of basic stats and writings of mine that are more introductory than anything else. Your assignment: Go through my blog and pick the pieces you want people to read first!

    Facebook page is becoming a success?
  2. Fathers and Homosexuals do not mix: PLEASE DELETE MY BLOG ENTIRELY

    by , 13th-May-2011 at 04:27 AM (Misandry and Fathers)
    1. Re: No poll from me

    2. Please delete my blog
    3. Truly,
    4. Bob
    Bob, I know you are offended by Lady Caff and her support of deviance, but she has a gun and is pointing it in the same direction as we are - against feminism and misandry.

    I do not support deviance or homosexual behaviours either but I am quite able to recognise an ally when I see one and when I observe them shooting at the enemy.

    Please do argue with deviance. Do argue against homosexual behaviours. But do not make the error of confusing the sinner with the sin.

    Sir Percy,
    You will see that Brother Marx is copied in, two birds with one writing.
    If you can not take the time to read this completely, that is your choice, feminism and misandry is a rather complex thing.
    I understand differentiating between the sinner and the sin, and your words are well put. Someone else has written that I think not in haste, which is another apt thought for me to consider.
    Catherine the person does not offend me truth to tell, she most certainly if truly she is sexually deviant, is not the first I have met. I have friends who are homosexual, we have even collaborated, a couple are dear friends to me. I know some of the LGBT advocates. I am simply to old to be naive to the ways of the world. I doubt her credulity, that, about me, is certainly true and I highly suspect an agenda that is contrary to antimisandry, men, and Fathers.
    I know of the schism between Mens Rights and Fathers Rights, I can telephone or write or email the senior elder of both camps: most amusing is when one or the other writes to me to tell me what the other said, no longer a boy I am none the less the junior in the middle, but both sides concede this point or that, agree to disagree, and yet know there is common ground.
    In comes however a third faction, which I believe is properly called sexual deviance: gay men seeking legitimacy by linking ...
    Tags: gay, lesbians
  3. King henry the sixth part iii v. Ii. 189-iii.25

    by , 12th-May-2011 at 05:37 PM (Misandry and Fathers)
    -William Shakespeare (ca 1623)
    (from the text prepared by Arthur Henry Bullen – 1904)
    Scene III.
    Court of TITUS’ (ANDRONICUS) house: tables set out.
    Enter LUCIUS, MARCUS, and GOTHS, with AARON prisoner.
    UNCLE Marcus, since it is my father’s mind
    That I repair to Rome, I am content.
    And ours with thine, befall what fortune will.
    Good uncle, take you in this barbarous Moor,
    This ravenous tiger, this accursed devil;
    Let tim receive no sustenance, fetter him,
    Till he be so brought unto the empress’ face,
    For testimony of her foul proceedings;
    And see the ambush of our friends be strong;
    I fear the emperor means no good to us.
    Some devil whisper curses in my ear,
    And prompt me that my tongue may utter forth
    The venomous malice of my swelling heart!
    Away, inhuman dog! unhallow’d slave!—
    Sirs, help our uncle to convey him in.
    [Exuent some GOTHS with Aaron. Flourishes within.
    The trumpets show the emperor is at hand
    What, hath the firmament more suns than one?
    What boots it thee to call thyself a sun?
    Rome’s emperor, and nephew, break the parle;
    These quarrels must be quietly debated.
    The feast is ready, which the careful Titus
    Hath ordain’d to an honourable end,
    For peace, for love, for league, and good to Rome:
    Please you, therefore, draw nigh, and take your places.

    Written in an age where sexual intercourse and sodomy were called by their definitive names as listed in dictionaries: Titus Andronicus defended Rome against the Goths and Moors, returning from those wars to place Saturninus on Rome’s throne. Titus’s daughter already engaged ...
    Tags: Fathers
  4. Before There Were Men’s Rights, there was and still are Fathers…

    by , 12th-May-2011 at 04:15 PM (Misandry and Fathers)
    Before There Was Men’s Rights, there was and still are Fathers…
    …Fathers Rights advocates and activists, active since the 1960’s: they have stoically and quietly done the heavy lifting. It would seem that there may be those who wish to ride upon the backs of Fathers and Children’s Rights Activists and Advocates, some quite literally.
    Brothers are Brothers that is true, and like some Brothers In Shakespeare’s King Richard the Third or even Homer’s Odyssey, there are weak Brothers who would forsake their own: thinking not of Brotherhood but only of advancing their own personal interest.
    Tags: Fathers
  5. Gender politics - a policy of equality or tolerance?

    by , 12th-May-2011 at 03:49 PM
    Quote Quote from Richard View Post
    What is the difference between equality and tolerance?

    Do we really believe in equality? One man, one vote, equality before the law…but that’s about it. Try telling people they should all have an equal wage – or be in equal size.

    No, we tolerate such differences – within reason, less in Europe, more in the US.

    Do we really want gender rights equality? Do people really want gays lesbians, etc (LGBT) to have equal rights to hetrosexuals? Has this ever been put to a vote?

    Do people really want to allow gays to be married, and adopt children? Do people want their kids to be taught in schools – to which parents cannot object – that being gay is perfectly acceptable and that gays should be allowed to adopt? Has a referendum been held on the issue?

    We hear so much about bisexuals, trisexuals demisexuals and god knows that else on this forum, that any new hetro man might well wonder where all the “normal” men have gone. Its like its almost a sin or social shame to stand up and say I am a hetro and I like women.

    As a hetro for some reason I feel a lot under pressure – its as though its wrong to be a hetro, but for me being hetro is ultra cool. It is not boring, nor bland – indeed there are no end of variety of fun things we can do.

    So where does this leave sexual minorities? In my short time on this forum (3-4 months?), I have seen a steady stream of a variety of (male) genders appear as our members. When such people appear as refugees from feminists you know this is a good sign as the feminist show how intolerant they are.

    And that is the key word for me - TOLERANCE. I have no problem with gays, bi’s, etc. They have always been around and always will. They often add a bit of colour, cosmopolitanism, and sometimes even have the best damh clubs in town.

    But that is where I draw the line. They have freedom of speech,
  6. Why are we here - in deed

    by , 12th-May-2011 at 02:38 PM (Misandry and Fathers)
    Brother Marx;
    Please know, I have blogged the following, and promoted them to article, applied and saved and yet they remain "unpublished" perhaps there is something I am doing incorrectly
    With Catherine, and Zeta and Silent Blood there seems a decidedly different change here in 2011. I was around for the evolutions of MND (Mens News Daily) I watched Elam proclaim homosexuality be protected there, I watched who would be censored, who was kicked out, and whose submissions were dismissed, if you did not support homosexuals you were out, that is the direction that he took it, and now that is who MND is for and the women on the front page. MND is no longer cited by Fathers but rather shunned, sexual deviance is not in the best interests of children that has been determined by whole cadres of Ph.D.s
    Perhaps when trying to create articles [I note Catherines ridiculous piece is on the front] it is not what I do but rather I am censored as Elam would do at MND.
    There are schisms already between Amneus-Smith-Doyle all three would not support Elam's Homosexual link it is not helpful to most men or most Men's Fathers.
    Some could consider, how do we decry a Boyz Crisis and look for solutions thereof, while sponsoring homosexual predators: and that is how it will be seen in the popular press.
    There are more men who are Fathers than there are those who are homosexual or bi or good Lord knows what else,
    all boys have them.
    Perhaps I am mistaken, and I am doing something incorrectly when promoting to articles: if that be the case Brother Marx and ...
  7. Men, Fathers and those who wish to fracture and damage them

    by , 12th-May-2011 at 01:45 PM (Misandry and Fathers)
    Feminism is not about equal anything: it is about the abolishment of patriarchy and the establishment of a matriarchy, where females have the resources and will to do as they please and name the consequences of their choices: it is both an economic and political thing.
    I want what I want when I want it! Entitled subsidies, entitled foundations to spread political ideology. Boyz Crisis it does not exist claim feminists. Men are pigs and sons are worthless: instead we need to take our daughters to work. No pornography, no legalized prostitution, men shall do, and do not, in bed as women demand. Control over life itself birth (abortion) and end of life and when, a great mechanism to determine the population you wish to exist. Feminism may be more nefarious then some have thought.
    DADS and Fathers, everyone has them: and that is where feminists have dwelt their misandric attack on men and males the sex of the Y chromosome, and by connection the traditional family. No existing social traditions for feminists, “women do not stay at home to nurture the children go to work instead seek your destiny”, “men are as necessary as a bicycle to a fish”, “Fathers are unwanted, we will take their money, but the men themselves are unimportant especially in the tender years”, men do not deserve that they desire, they are SCUM, women want what they want, and need the power and control, to place their desires above all else.
    MacKinnon, de Beauvoir feminists have been linked to sexual deviance from the start: wantonness, narcissum, sadly all projected as “sexy” the marketers’ card in the hole, sadder still the men who endure it, without fathoming why.
    Bi sexual, homosexual, mental abnormality, “I” (me) [meopia] thinking only of themselves, whether they will get laid, experience and orgasm, time and again and as often as able –“what I want, when I want it”, just like the feminists.
    The future is with the un-aborted children - that is how societies, populations, ...
    Tags: Fathers
  8. The Zeta Concept and Jung: WALK!

    by , 12th-May-2011 at 02:35 AM (Musings of a Pro-Human Woman)
    Is there no standard anymore? What it takes, who I am, where I've been . Belong You can't be something you're not. Be yourself, by yourself. Stay away from me. A lesson learned in life. Known from the dawn of time. -Pantera, Walk

    We cannot change anything unless we accept it. Condemnation does not liberate, it oppresses. - Carl Jung

    The basic Zeta male concept is defying social norms in favor of individuality is going to be the basis of this concept first created by Paul Elam and has spread like a meme in the MRA community. Carl Jung basically said that individuation is the only way someone can be psychologically whole. Individuation is the gradual integration and unification of the self through the resolution of successive layers of psychological conflict.

    In this article, I am going to expand on this concept with Jungian psychology and apply it to women as well.

    The Persona is the mask worn to greet the world. Optimally, this does not undermine the authenticity of the self. Its primary function is to navigate the space between the inner world of ego with its surrounding self and the outer world of values and culture. How these worlds rub up against one another is negotiated by the persona. The hidden or unconscious aspects of oneself, both good and bad, which the ego has either repressed or never recognized, is called the Shadow.

    Considering that society and culture often makes demands of both women and men, it is feasible that we create personas that force us to act in a way that is not authentic to ourselves, one that neglects our shadows. The Zeta Male and Zeta Female defy social expectations from all external factors and looks to themselves to create something authentic, but that requires the Hero/ine to descend into the nightmarish to confront our Shadows.

    The Shadow develops in us, because as we grow and absorb our culture, we naturally repress parts of our nature because they are ...
    Tags: gender, jung
  9. So what the fuck is a Zeta Male Anyway?

    by , 11th-May-2011 at 11:26 PM (Rise of the Zeta Male)
    By now I am assuming you have all seen Paul’s video on the basic premise. It is vague, and a good foundation. But you can’t help but ask-what the fuck is a Zeta Male?

    Well, the term comes from the concept of the alpha male and the beta male, where zeta is in the middle of the Greek alphabet. The interesting thing is that one does not choose whether to be an alpha or a beta, but you do get the luxury to choose to be a zeta.

    The idea of the alpha and beta male are based on the concept of who are the leaders and who are the followers in society. Who are the best of providers, and who come in second. You grow up through your life being taught what to do. Who do you provide for, you hold doors open for women, and so on. The social constructs and institutional ideas of what men should be appear.

    Before you realize it you have been molded into the man you are and fall into a category. You may be caught somewhere in between, but on the odds you still lean more towards one title or the other. In the end, from a critical eye, and an institutional one, you will be branded whether you like it or not. You have been given a status, for better or worse based on your upbringing, your social skills, and a bit of luck.

    The problems with the idea of alpha and beta males is the traits are partially based on superiority/inferiority and they are actually rather constricting and come with the standard restrictions of manhood (the inability to show emotions, you must raise a family, and be the breadwinner, etc). You are given a code of conduct, and depending on how well you do determines the end results. Traditionally speaking, you either played the game or you forfeit by default. There weren’t many options, and even alpha males were stuck where you were. No matter where you are, there is always a desire for freedom and change.

    Sometimes when there are few options, people tend to be happier, as they don’t have the abundance ...
  10. The Real Purpose of the Anti-Male Shaming Tactics

    by , 10th-May-2011 at 04:44 AM (Rise of the Zeta Male)
    We have all seen them. We have all heard them. We have all banged our heads against the wall before responding to them. I am of course talking about The Anti-Male Shaming Tactics, the list of remarks used by skeptics, feminists, and white knights. The goal: to get us to shut up.

    Or at least that’s what I thought at first, but then I got to thinking. Feminist political lobbies and some internet censorship should be strong enough to keep MRAs from grasping the power needed for progressive change. Why add shaming tactics? Its not going to get people to change their minds about issues. If anything it just hardens the soldiers, makes the tough tougher, and the strong, stronger.

    The answer is to curve normality.

    By using shaming language, feminists denounce and reject those that oppose what is considered conventional wisdom. Common knowledge is in their hands, and they intend to keep it that way. Through the use of shaming language they determine what is and is not acceptable in the realms of sanity and reason.

    The shaming tactics help to determine what is and is not “rational”.

    More here

    The facebook page you are all terrible people for not liking yet
Page 27 of 61 FirstFirst ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 ... LastLast
Donate to AntiMisandry

Donate to AntiMisandry

1e2 Forum