Uncategorized

I have heard ‘f’s talking a lot about male privilege, and wondered what it was – and how I could obtain it… I wanna be priv-lijd! Check out how many exclamation marks I can fit into 1 post!!!!!

So I googled (googled IS a word!) male privilege and found this inspiring article all about it here: http://www.amptoons.com/blog/the-mal...ege-checklist/

Apparently, my not knowing what my privileges are is a privilege unto itself! Additions by me are marked with a *.
The Male Privilege Checklist
1. My odds of being hired for a job, when competing against female applicants, are probably skewed in my favo(u*)r. The more prestigious the job, the larger the odds are skewed.
* So with affirmative action favouring women and other ‘minorities’, the odds are skewed in MY favour, as an evil white man! Great!
2. I can be confident that my co-workers won’t think I got my job because of my sex – even though that might be true.
* Again with all of the affirmative action and what-not, this is certainly true. They all know I got my job despite my sex! Here we go with the privileges!
3. If I am never promoted, it’s not because of my sex.
* Isn’t it? See above.
4. If I fail in my job or career, I can feel sure this won’t be seen as a black mark against my entire sex’s capabilities.
*What like ‘men can’t multi-task’ or ‘look after children’?
5. I am far less likely to face sexual harassment at work than my female co-workers are.
*I think that depends on your definition of ‘sexual harassment’, it’s illegal if men do it, yet fine and dandy, even laughable, when women do it! You missed one -men getting sexually harassed at work is a privilege, no? “You love it really”. Erm no, fat ugly women hawking at my ass is not my idea of fun.
6. If I do the same task as a woman, and if the measurement is at all subjective, chances are people will think I did a better job.
*I think you hit the coffin’s final nail square on the head when you said ‘subjective’.
7. If I’m a teen or adult, and if I can stay out of prison, my odds of being raped are relatively low.
*This is true for all people. Unless you are insane, and believe the whole 1 in 4 BS. See what you scaremongering fems did?
8. On average, I am taught to fear walking alone after dark in average public spaces much less than my female counterparts are.
*And this is a privilege? I’m also FAR more likely to be attacked! It’s a privilege to be ignored and seen as dispensable!
9. If I choose not to have children, my masculinity will not be called into question.
*That’s working under the assumption that I have any ‘right’ whatsoever to ‘choose’ to have children or not, which I don’t think, hold on I’ll check… No I don’t.
10. If I have children but do not provide primary care for them, my masculinity will not be called into question.
*Feckless father? Deadbeat dad? What if I WANT to provide ‘primary care’?
11. If I have children and provide primary care for them, I’ll be praised for extraordinary parenting if I’m even marginally competent.
*Like when women get praised for beating a man in a marathon, even though she had a 30 minute headstart?
12. If I have children and a career, no one will think I’m selfish for not staying at home.
*Can I stay at home?
13. If I seek political office, my relationship with my children, or who I hire to take care of them, will probably not be scrutinized by the press.
*Like David Cameron wasn’t? There seems to be a lot of room for probability here…
14. My elected representatives are mostly people of my own sex. The more prestigious and powerful the elected position, the more this is true.
*Oh yes like Margeret Thatcher, the prime minister we had in the UK, when was it… 30 years ago?!
15. When I ask to see “the person in charge,” odds are I will face a person of my own sex. The higher-up in the organization the person is, the surer I can be.
*In any house in the country, ask to see ‘the boss’ and it won’t be a willy slinger!
16. As a child, chances are I was encouraged to be more active and outgoing than my sisters.
*Chances, chances… I don’t have any sisters, shame!
17. As a child, I could choose from an almost infinite variety of children’s media featuring positive, active, non-stereotyped heroes of my own sex. I never had to look for it; male protagonists were (and are) the default.
*Yeah, my favourite book as a kid was Little Red Riding Hood, then Alice in Wonderland; and The Wizard of Oz. I didn’t care much for the ‘hero’ stereotype.
18. As a child, chances are I got more teacher attention than girls who raised their hands just as often.
*Lol! If the evil pervert wasn’t trying to chat them up!
19. If my day, week or year ...

I was out a couple of weeks ago and got talking to two nice seeming young Italian women. We were getting along fine and our respective groups merged to produce a larger, more sociable one. The two women started having a chat in their native tongue and when I asked them what they were discussing they told me ‘Feminism, of course’. Is it so widespread and ‘normal’ for woman to be embroiled within the slimy tentacles of the feminist ideology that we men should expect two young, attractive and educated women to be engaging on it’s debate while out with other friends (including men) on a Friday night?

‘You are joking’ I irked in hope. No such luck I’m afraid. The less pretty of the two, presumably putting herself in the ‘more intelligent’ role, went on to explain to me that she doesn’t hate men and that all she wants is equality. Nice try! After I asked her about her views on abortion, child support, parental alienation, false rape claims, domestic violence, retirement age, prostate cancer research, disparity in criminal sentencing, state schools and sexism in the media she did what any good old man ‘-ater’ would do - she called me a misogynist and left. Her friend (the more attractive one) gave me her mobile number, so maybe we’ll meet again, I certainly hope so.

This episode made me think about how feminists have conjured an idea that their values don’t amount to misandry, and that any opposition to their cause amounts to misogyny. How did they convince women that they don’t hate men? They obviously don’t hate men; they simply want to ‘-ate’ them, as follows:


Dominate

Ever heard the term ‘female empowerment’, one of the most popular phrases used by the feminists? Well if you have and you think they don’t want to dominate men then you should pop your hairy evil ass over to dictionary.com and look up a definition. Heck I’ll even do it for you (edited):

empower
–verb (used with object, eg. )

To give power or authority to; authorize, especially by legal or official means.

Note also that the 4 quotes (uses in a sentence) that were linked to this word were all snippets of feminists speaking in the media. Need I say more?


Castigate

All men are rapists! It is a fact, if you want to believe it or not, that if a woman makes a false rape allegation against you then you can forget about due process, innocent until proven guilty and any other civil liberty you think you have. You must prove that she is lying, simple as that. Why would she lie about something so serious and put herself through the ‘ordeal’ of a rape trial? This is the exact attitude that you will face from the authorities concerned, wherever you happen to live. The laws regarding rape have all been put in place by feminists and/or to appease ‘women’s groups’ (publicly funded and run by feminists).

The domestic violence laws across the Anglo-sphere castigate men every day (VAWA, mandatory arrests, ‘Go’ orders etc). Men are forced into programs that demean and emasculate them to ‘correct’ their oppressive behaviours toward women. Men are always given more severe punishments than women in criminal trials. The only people that are (tirelessly) campaigning for legislation of this nature are feminists, who don’t hate men. Maybe they just hate evil penises… ‘Castigate his penis now’!

The ‘patriarchy’ is to blame for everything. We, as men, are at fault for all of life’s ills and injustices. We therefore deserve to be castigated, what is a little bit of castigation when we’ve enjoyed millennia of power? It isn’t hatred, just ‘-atred’.


Subjugate

Aside from the other evil ways feminists wish to command and conquer the human race discussed above, there is always the oldest and dirtiest trick – sexual subjugation. ‘You’re not getting any until you do what I want’. Ever had a girlfriend tell you that? Listen to any feminist discussion of pornography and you will come across the same shitty position: it’s bad if men are looking at women in a sexual way, however it is perfectly fine, and indeed commendable (you go girl!) for a woman to use her body as a means of ‘empowerment’ (see above). Feminists are acutely aware of the male sex drive and its power, and they plan to use it to its full extent.


One thing that feminists forget in their attack on men is their real nature. You see, as you look back through History - that men have always (and always will) by their very essence of masculinity been willing to fight and die for the well being of their peers. There will be (and has been) martyrs of all scope, size, shape, creed and colour; who see the feminists for what they really are and will fight them, to the death. Willingness to die for their cause is a trait I seriously doubt ...

The truth is out there, as Fox Mulder tells us, and it isn't very far away at all...

The truth about relationships? Well that's a little more difficult to discover, mostly because of the female-centric media stuffing rubbish down our throats. If we were to listen to them, as instructed by our feminist overlords, we would come to a very different conclusion as to what is the undeniable truth, which I will discuss later. I'm splitting this post into 2 parts: 1. The feminist version of reality and 2. Reality. I sincerely hope it is evident why.

1. The feminist version of reality
The evil bigots that call themselves feminists would have us believe that, for the most part, (apart from when he is truly whipped) all 'normal' modern relationships follow a similar trend. Their usual bumf would normally go something like as follows:

The man is so powerful (physically, emotionally and politically) that the woman is subjected to his every whimsical demand, or suffer from 'violence' (apparently a fate worse than death for poor defenseless women, although men are obviously immune to it). She is sexually oppressed by the man, who denies her the freedom to express her sexual desires towards other men. She is forced, by her evilpenis wielding partner, to either stay at home and look after the children he forced her to have (by insisting on having sex); or to slave away at work to pay for the children he forced her to have because he (as a powerful male patriarch) is too lazy to earn enough to support them alone. If she stays at home she is forced, by our patriarchal society, to watch misogynistic shows on TV (during the break of her heavy housewife schedule) that are aimed at men and the maintenance of patriarchal power. If she goes to work she faces much discrimination in the workplace; for example she is less likely to be considered for a job, she will earn less, there is a limit to how far she can progress in said job, she will be subjected to daily sexual harassment and sexist comments, and won't be taken seriously by her chauvinist colleagues.

When the working day is over, she is constantly treading on eggshells because the evilpenis could become 'violent' at any time. She must meticulously prepare all of his food and do all of the housework to his unbelievably high standards - regardless of how many hours each of them works, and lives in a constant state of fear that she will be deemed inadequate and subsequently further abused.

She is forced to denigrate her body regularly to keep up with his unyielding and rampant male sex drive (evilpenis?), and is 'psychologically coerced' into sex, if not raped, frequently. He shows no respect to her or his children (whom he is abusive to also), all he cares about is maintaining his 'privilege'. She is often humiliated by him and his desire to mate with other females, he constantly ogles or leers at other women on television that are innocently exploited by other evilpenises into showing her body and being sexually provocative.

Society has conditioned the man to treat women like slaves that he can do unto whatever he wants, whenever he wants - and she had better support him, or face the wrath of his violence. This accentuates his own natural tendency to be violent and oppressive, being an evilpenis. Larger society obviously supports his moral worldview, being the toxic masculine patriarchy that it so clearly is, and any pleas for help from the woman are met with a stern silence and a 'go back to the kitchen' from all of the supposed lawful upholders, who are all sexist evilpenises anyway. She is stuck, trapped by an evilpenis and his evilpenis accomplices - a slave and a prisoner to all evilpenises everywhere.

What a terrible plight. You cannot help but feel compassion for this woman right? Sorry make that all women. Please remember that every single domestic violence 'charity' and rape crisis centre, relationship guidance company, violence education program and your local council/government considering how to tackle dv/rape/family breakup operate under the assertion that all of these things are true (google duluth model).

2.Reality

Men in our society are conditioned, from birth, to believe certain things. Inclusive of these are: that hitting women is wrong, women deserve respect and are equal to men, rapists and paedophiles are evil, that he should shoulder the financial burden of his family, that any wrongs he may face are a 'fact of life' and are to be dealt with accordingly and with honour, that the protection of any women in his life is his duty and also that sex is dirty or somehow wrong - amongst many other things.

Women are conditioned to believe something different, including all of the claptrap in part 1. Men have oppressed them since the beginning of time, society favours ...