Daniel Conroy

The truth is out there, as Fox Mulder tells us, and it isn't very far away at all...

The truth about relationships? Well that's a little more difficult to discover, mostly because of the female-centric media stuffing rubbish down our throats. If we were to listen to them, as instructed by our feminist overlords, we would come to a very different conclusion as to what is the undeniable truth, which I will discuss later. I'm splitting this post into 2 parts: 1. The feminist version of reality and 2. Reality. I sincerely hope it is evident why.

1. The feminist version of reality
The evil bigots that call themselves feminists would have us believe that, for the most part, (apart from when he is truly whipped) all 'normal' modern relationships follow a similar trend. Their usual bumf would normally go something like as follows:

The man is so powerful (physically, emotionally and politically) that the woman is subjected to his every whimsical demand, or suffer from 'violence' (apparently a fate worse than death for poor defenseless women, although men are obviously immune to it). She is sexually oppressed by the man, who denies her the freedom to express her sexual desires towards other men. She is forced, by her evilpenis wielding partner, to either stay at home and look after the children he forced her to have (by insisting on having sex); or to slave away at work to pay for the children he forced her to have because he (as a powerful male patriarch) is too lazy to earn enough to support them alone. If she stays at home she is forced, by our patriarchal society, to watch misogynistic shows on TV (during the break of her heavy housewife schedule) that are aimed at men and the maintenance of patriarchal power. If she goes to work she faces much discrimination in the workplace; for example she is less likely to be considered for a job, she will earn less, there is a limit to how far she can progress in said job, she will be subjected to daily sexual harassment and sexist comments, and won't be taken seriously by her chauvinist colleagues.

When the working day is over, she is constantly treading on eggshells because the evilpenis could become 'violent' at any time. She must meticulously prepare all of his food and do all of the housework to his unbelievably high standards - regardless of how many hours each of them works, and lives in a constant state of fear that she will be deemed inadequate and subsequently further abused.

She is forced to denigrate her body regularly to keep up with his unyielding and rampant male sex drive (evilpenis?), and is 'psychologically coerced' into sex, if not raped, frequently. He shows no respect to her or his children (whom he is abusive to also), all he cares about is maintaining his 'privilege'. She is often humiliated by him and his desire to mate with other females, he constantly ogles or leers at other women on television that are innocently exploited by other evilpenises into showing her body and being sexually provocative.

Society has conditioned the man to treat women like slaves that he can do unto whatever he wants, whenever he wants - and she had better support him, or face the wrath of his violence. This accentuates his own natural tendency to be violent and oppressive, being an evilpenis. Larger society obviously supports his moral worldview, being the toxic masculine patriarchy that it so clearly is, and any pleas for help from the woman are met with a stern silence and a 'go back to the kitchen' from all of the supposed lawful upholders, who are all sexist evilpenises anyway. She is stuck, trapped by an evilpenis and his evilpenis accomplices - a slave and a prisoner to all evilpenises everywhere.

What a terrible plight. You cannot help but feel compassion for this woman right? Sorry make that all women. Please remember that every single domestic violence 'charity' and rape crisis centre, relationship guidance company, violence education program and your local council/government considering how to tackle dv/rape/family breakup operate under the assertion that all of these things are true (google duluth model).

2.Reality

Men in our society are conditioned, from birth, to believe certain things. Inclusive of these are: that hitting women is wrong, women deserve respect and are equal to men, rapists and paedophiles are evil, that he should shoulder the financial burden of his family, that any wrongs he may face are a 'fact of life' and are to be dealt with accordingly and with honour, that the protection of any women in his life is his duty and also that sex is dirty or somehow wrong - amongst many other things.

Women are conditioned to believe something different, including all of the claptrap in part 1. Men have oppressed them since the beginning of time, society favours men and they have a special privilege, even though they are just as capable as men they are wrongly depicted as inferior, men are only after one thing, men are feckless and stupid, men aren't capable of looking after children, their partner will likely cheat and/or try to cheat, that men are inherently violent, that all paedophiles and rapists are men, that men are often violent and abusive to their partner - all dv is perpetrated by men, women are 'the fairer sex', women are mostly kind natured and caring... I'm sure you get the idea and could add a few yourself.

This has a very detrimental effect on their attitude when it comes to relationships. Their 'entitlement mindset' destroys the integrity of any relationship they become involved in, and they naturally become abusive to their male partner.

A man must give total control of his finances to his female partner. If he doesn't, he is being abusive. She has the free choice of working or not. If the man decides to stay at home for the children he will be shamed and called lazy, deadbeat dad, or something similar. He is also abusive, by virtue of his neglect.

If a man and woman go to a bar together as a couple, it is ok for a woman to openly flirt with other men who approach her. If the man objects to this behaviour, he is shamed and called 'jealous', and therefore abusive. If the man tries to talk to any other women, he is shamed and called a 'player' or 'womaniser' or something similar, and is therefore abusive.

If a woman is unhappy with any facet of the relationship, the man must listen with intent and respect, accept anything the woman says and try to modify his behaviour as such, if he doesn't he is being abusive. If the man is unhappy with any facet of the relationship, he must accept the cards he has been dealt. If he complains about her and/or disagrees with her in any way, he is being abusive. This is especially true when it comes to sex, as a man you cannot complain about sex. If you do complain about not having enough sex, and she then concedes and consents, you could be sent to prison for 'rape' (she felt like she was forced) for a very long time - circa. 5-7 years in the UK, although you could be given a life sentence.

If a woman, for whatever reason (be it jealousy, stress, PMT, bipolarity, instability, alcohol, drugs, him not doing what he is told, or any other that I can't think of now), decides to become violent to her male partner then he cannot even so much as defend himself from her. If he calls the police it is highly likely that he will be the one arrested, and because he called the police she would probably lie to make her appear even more of a victim, as an act of revenge for his temerity in calling the police on her. If she is really angry she could make an accusation of rape and/or dv, and literally destroy his (and his family's) life, without any evidence other than her word. She would also be given compensation of around £12,000 for her 'ordeal', whether or not it was proved or even got to court. Even if she has been proven as a liar, she will not be prosecuted. Impunity for females in heterosexual relationships is reality.

Should the relationship come to an end, for whatever reason, any children involved would automatically be given to her; along with the house and at least half of any assets that the couple shared (please note that this only applies to married and cohabiting couples, which are legally now the same thing), regardless of what each person has contributed. If she decides, again for whatever reason, that she doesn't want the father to see his children she can simply say no. A lengthy and expensive court-case (where there is an incentive for her to claim abuse, as a means of obtaining legal-aid) would ensue where the judge will inevitably side with her, and any unbased accusation of abuse could result in the loss of access to his children, with the legal enforcement of payments to enhance her lifestyle ('support the children') still existing. If he is granted legal access, she is free to flout the order and still, if she sees fit, deny him access to his children - with total impunity.


If you haven't got the message yet, the bottom line is this:

If you get into a relationship with a western woman, she has you by the balls in more ways than you could possibly imagine, literally. You must, as a prerequisite, agree to everything she says and follow her every command - if not she can very, very easily destroy you and your extended family.

Originally posted on http://evilpenis.blogspot.com