Uncategorized

The complete download of Agent Orange files are now available. This download is about 160MG + of files and it's a complete set of screen dumps that were lifted off the public and private RADFEM Hub website and forum, with all their recommendations about eugenics, genocide, child murdering, men killing, terrorism comments..


So be warned..


Just bear this in mind. Being exposed to this obnoxious, nasty poison will stay with you once it's read, as it cannot be removed. These comments are beyond disgusting and are as vile as you may or could possibly imagine. Just bear that in mind..


Also bear in mind that some of the women on this hate site are also involved with introducing laws and affecting legislation at government levels. We have already traced quite a few to government departments as well as professionals making submissions to governments for inclusion into law..


Their effectiveness can already be witnessed in the Family Courts system, Education Department's preferences for women only, Government promotions of VAWA as well as sexist male bashing advertising in regards to domestic violence which seeks to solely blame men..


All those anti male laws have been promoted and introduced by these radical feminists who are determined to destroy masculinity as well as any and all positive traits that men possess. That is their aim and SCUM Manifesto is the framework from which they work..


Those radical feminist have to be stopped..


Agent Orange file download..

Why Do Radical Feminists Want to Destroy Men's Sheds..




Scum Manifesto and Agent Orange..



The Men's Shed innovation was a boon for locals alike. It gave an opportunity for men to spend time learning new interests while at the same time, help the local community and individuals who would like to learn a few new tricks. Lately, more sheds have been showing up over Australia, New Zealand and in the UK. Community groups see the value of these sheds as not only being mentoring centres for the younger generation but help others in DIY methods, with a little bit of hands on..

So what about men's sheds..

WHAT IS A MEN’S SHED? The modern Men’s Shed is an updated version of the shed in the backyard that has long been a part of Australian culture. Men’s Sheds are springing up all around Australia. If you looked inside one you might see a number of men restoring furniture, perhaps restoring bicycles for a local school, maybe making Mynah bird traps or fixing lawn mowers or making a kids cubby house for Camp Quality to raffle.

As you can see, they are used for numerous reasons to help the local community and also "show by example", to install a sense of helping others and teach the younger generation all about caring and sharing within their local community. One would imagine that the inclusion of men's sheds locally and in the local community would be a positive and well supported innovation that demonstrates what supporting local communities is all about. Many people have already praised their efforts and how that help is appreciated. It's basically a two way method that has helped both parties..

Why Do Radical Feminists Want to Destroy Men's Sheds ?

To whose benefit would it be to promote their destruction and one must also ask what their motives are. If the Men's Sheds were introduced to encourage community involvement as well as ensuring health benefits for the people participating, one would think that they are great help, but not according to radical feminists..

Here are some comments from the RADFEM HUB forum (Radical Feminist Forum) where radical feminists are promoting the destruction of those Men's Sheds..

Here are a few example -

And some additional comments taken form that same site..

helzeph wrote:
I wonder if we could lock them in their permanently. Or could we blow them up and call it "a service to the community".

helzeph

"Broad-thinking innovation" delphyne.
Allecto thanks for seconding the initiative. You could paint the at night, with slogans about the importance of women's refuges and how men are stealing their funding. Then apply for an arts grant.

Amazon Mancrusher

Hmmmm what about the women in the community who aspire to live in a community without men?
...Im involved in a feminist group

allecto

"helzeph wrote:
sheds I wonder if we could lock them in their permanently. Or could we blow
them up and call it "a service to the community". "

Yea!

Radical feminists obviously see this as an achievable goal, they have put it forward as a proposal, put forward as a motion and seconded it. the option of destroying or defacing Men's Sheds is their latest hate-fest goal..

However, it does become an issue when we have a group of people raging against half of the population on the planet and deliberately planning their destruction and removal.
Copious information has been secured from these Radical Feminists sites to demonstrate beyond doubt that they are past just thinking about that or talking about it. We have already shown you the lunatic ranting of the author Pamela O'Shaughnessy and her wish to eliminate the male population via use of eugenics plus promoting genocide as another option. These radical feminists need to be exposed and we will expose them and tell you who they really are and let society decide what to do with these male-hating fanatics..

We have been given inside information from a net investigator, by the name of "Agent Orange". Agent Orange has infiltrated those sites and exposed their murderous intentions, their identities, the positions they occupy in public and private. These radicals are part of the community in which they live but secretly meet to discuss and plan the annihilation of millions or men and boys, your Fathers, Sons ...

Exposing the AW's Radical Feminist Core..

It is as if, automatically on cue. State the most obnoxious, absurd, the most outlandish remark you can think of about most American Women and they will go out of their way to not only prove it to be correct but also back it up with something even worse..

Wow, and you guys actually live in the same country and probably take them out to lunch. Tell me I am wrong..

From The Counter-Feminist blog of Fidelbogen. He would not have to search too far and nor does anyone else to find this bit of usual misandry..
Wednesday, November 09, 2011

Speaks For Itself

The accompanying is a screen capture from a larger screen capture which one of "our people" (wink, wink!) gathered from a secret, members-only feminist web forum.

What you see here is the quintessential, inner truth about feminism-as-a-whole. Yes, yes. We all know that Not All Feminists Are Like That.

NAFALT!

Unfortunately, the ones who are "not like that" are merely irrelevant. They have little to do with the actual center of power, and they are of scant interest to those who are fighting said power. These earnest ones frankly bore us, and we frankly wish they would shut the hell up and disappear. They are a nuisance and a distraction which obsures feminism's rotten core from the world's gaze. But that is their purpose -- camouflage.

So, what you see in the screen capture is the TRUTH about feminism. Those people are not what insipid folk so politely called the "radical fringe". No, they are the radical core. Without their living presence on planet earth, feminism would simply not exist in a meaningful or viable form. Lacking the ardent nucleus of unbridled animosity toward all things male, it would have long ago spent itself and faded away.

Click on the pic to get a larger (more readable) view.

Please note that the opposite animosity, expressed toward women by men (as it occasionally is) is not the "core" of non-feminism, since non-feminism has no core. It is not even analogous to feminism, being simply the rest of the world, the world beyond feminism. Non-feminism is not an ideology, not a doctrine, not a religion, not a system of thought, not a political party, but only a vast, loose collection of things that vary wildly. As the wise saying goes, the world is full of a number of things.
In parting, here is an inspirational article which promises us that even though "men may be dogs", we still love them.
Well. That's good hearing!Men May Be Dogs but We Love Them Anyway - MSN Relationships - article

Nothing like a women imagining scorn is there ?


Grandmother accused of hacking husband to death with machete


By Tristan Swanwick
November 19, 2008




A GRANDMOTHER hacked her 71-year-old husband to death with a machete because she thought he was seeing other women, a court has been told.

Kamalavati Sundar, 70, pleaded not guilty in the Supreme Court jury in Brisbane today to murdering her husband Ram as he slept in their Woodridge home in December 2005.
Mr Sundar was found lying face-down in bed with at least 14 machete wounds to his head and the top of his arms, prosecutor Angus Edwards told the court, the Courier-Mail reports.

Mr Edwards said the couple appeared to have a happy and loving marriage apart from Mrs Sundar's "jealous streak".

"On the night of the killing it all came to a head," he said.

After a family gathering at the couple's home, Mrs Sundar accused her husband of having an affair with his grandson's maternal grandmother, Mr Edwards said.

He told the jury the Fijian-born man went to bed after telling his wife he intended to leave her because of her constant accusations of infidelity.

"Mr Sundar didn't get the chance to do that because he never woke up."
The trial before Justice Peter Dutney continues.

Oh look, here we have the feminists dream female. A lesbian that is of the opinion that she is above the law. But I AM A WOMAN, this should be an automatic excuse for bad behaviour (a similar episode happened in Australia a while back when a WOMAN after murdering her husband, cook his remains in a stew and proceeded to serve him for supper to the kids, she made the same demand). She demanded to be released because she was a WOMAN. It's on my blog somewhere, I cannot be bothered..

Has anyone heard anything more ridiculous in their life ?

Automatic discount for the privileged sex..

I am rather amazed at this comment as it actually condemns another WOMAN to accountability, amazing..

"Parliament has said that, if you're going to engage in this sort of thing, you'd better not do it with children because you'll have no legal defence," he said.

I wonder what type of abuse he is getting for making that comment ?

But do not fear, here we have the standard "she is a victim" comment..

Whew, I thought it was too good ?

"It cannot have been Parliament's intention that such persons be branded paedophile for life."

Not for females anyway..

A LESBIAN pornographer will remain a convicted paedophile after the country's highest court refused to erase her criminal history.
The High Court today refused Rebecca Jane Clarke's application for special leave to appeal against her conviction for making six pornographic films with two 14-year-old girls, the Advertiser reports.
The decision means the 23-year-old, from Goulburn in New South Wales, will likely never achieve her dream of working as a counsellor for disadvantaged children.

Solicitor-General Martin Hinton QC told the court that was a consequence of Clarke's poor life choices.

"Parliament has said that, if you're going to engage in this sort of thing, you'd better not do it with children because you'll have no legal defence," he said.
"The consequences, albeit severe, don't change the fact the decision (to convict) was right."

Clarke – who says "I feel like a child molester" and "your breasts feel like a 10-year-old's" during the films – is serving a two-year good-behaviour bond for producing child pornography and inciting an indecent act.
She and her co-accused – Renee Jean Malyschko and Daniel Troy Osis – made a DVD of six movies, with the teenage girls, in 2005.
At her trial, Clarke said she "honestly believed" the girls were 17, comparing their physiques to Calista Flockheart and the Olsen twins.

In December 2007, the District Court ruled that defence did not exist in law.

Today Adam Richards, for Clarke, challenged that ruling.

"The law, as written, also catches the person who has been lied to, who honestly believes something is lawful, who has made a mistake," he said.

"It cannot have been Parliament's intention that such persons be branded paedophile for life."

The High Court, however, ruled there was insufficient reason for it to interfere with the original ruling.

Out of a Hundred Rapes only 10% happened..

This is where it's at..90% are lies..

Where are they, in jail for false allegation ? Dream on..

Women know they can scream "RAPE" and everyone listens but no one checks..

It's a known fact that women will use false rape claims to seek revenge and no one checks..

Women know that revenge is the sweetest act but no one checks..

Ever wonder why the rape statistics according to the feminists is such an epidemic..

No ONE CHECKS..

A question..

Originally posted by M&MBM

Do you think that real rape victims are less likely to report their ordeal than say, someone using the police as a means of revenge/punishment/assuagement of guilt for allowing things to go too far? And do you find that the false allegations come from the same type of person, or is it something all types of people do?
Does it jaundice your view of all victims?

What can be done to make sure that true victims still have the courage to come forward, but these vengeful types are discouraged? Cases like this? or do we have to put up with the dross to allow the true victims to feel safe about coming forward?

The response..

Most definitely but i'm professional enough to treat it as gospel until a dedicated sexual offences officer arrives.
This is why I think sentencing for false claims should be far higher...we've all read about the boy who cried wolf.

I fully agree with the above sentiment, out of the 100's of rapes and sexual assaults I can probably count on one hand the amount that were genuine.

Meanwhile we have a police officer stating the obvious and not one bureaucrat wants to know and no one checks..

Met Tec

I daresay I've been involved in 100 rape enquiries over the years. And I cannot imagine a worse crime to be a victim of.
Of the hundred I've looked at, I reckon about ten actually happened.
If a Senior Officer say's he got there by hard work, ask him "Who's?"

Oh and it's better, bear in mind it's Police Officers having this discussion..

Rape..........So easy to alledge, and extremly difficult to prove/disprove.
Like Met-tec above, I've been involved in scores over my 30 yrs, conviction rate , well that was very low. The reasons being are that if there is forensic/DNA then the accused will answer "Consentual sex", that is the bigest reason for Juries to aquit. One on One allegations and the CPS will decide insufficient evidence to proceed on the evidential test, even b4 they get to the public interest test. There are IMHO more victims who are cheated of Justice because of the burdens of proof then there are of perpetrators convicted.