Greetings!! Is this your first visit? If so, please consider registering. It enables downloads and removal of adverts. Use the 'facebook connect' for quick access.
View RSS Feed

Political Issues

  1. Toxic Radical Feminism Ensures Destruction..

    by , 25th-December-2011 at 07:11 PM

    Feminism Will Destroy Everyone..

    The Men's Movement has only ever and will only ever work for the good of society as greater minds and everyone involved in it over the centuries has determined it to be. The only problem with society is what radical feminists and feminists as a whole, determine those problems to be..

    They are just delusional..

    The entire problem with society is that feminism has been allowed to fester and infect society to try and destroy our normal existence and turn it into some loathing cauldron, which it is not. Radical feminism is the by product of marxism and their rampant hate for all is now coming to light. This is what they are teaching your children, they are teaching your children to hate everything and everyone..

    Is this the world that you want to raise your children in ?

    December 24, 2011Kyle Lovett<small style="color: rgb(56, 56, 56); font: normal normal bold 0.71em/normal Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; text-transform: uppercase; ">FEMINISM, SEXUAL POLITICS</small>

    The destructive logic of radical feminism

    I decided that before I got really deep into the long breadcrumb trail of radical feminists working towards changing laws and policies inside Australia, I wanted to take a moment to discuss radical and mainstream feminism at its base level. At the bottom of the page, I’ll list out several popular books by radical feminists that discuss what their ideology is all about. But I’ve noticed a lot of discussion here on AVFM and other sites questioning just what radical feminism is and if there is any difference to mainstream feminism. I thought it important to give at least my take on feminist and radical feminist theory, as I think it is important to understand what exactly these people
  2. Another "women are not Violent" Example..

    by , 24th-December-2011 at 10:36 AM
    Another "women are not Violent" Example..

    The lies that feminists tell always get exposed, one way or the other. It is akin to that saying "Sit on a river bank and watch the bodies of your enemies float by".
    Feminist lies are those bodies and here we have an example on how much they lie about women not being violent..

    This guys cannot even defend himself against this monster even if he had the guts to do it. He would be arrested and jailed. That they way it goes these days. Thanks to feminists like Harman and her male hating ilk..

    If this does not convince you, then I suggest you just bugger off and live your ignorant life somewhere else..

    As reality just does not do it for you..

    <object class="BLOGGER-youtube-video" classid="clsid<img src=" http:="""" images="" smilies="" biggrin.png"="" border="0" alt="" title="Big Grin" smilieid="3" width="520" height="266"><embed width="520" height="266" src="" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></object>

    Updated 24th-December-2011 at 10:42 AM by christianj

    Legal Matters , Political Issues , Fathers , Feminism
  3. SCUM Feminists..

    by , 21st-December-2011 at 09:39 PM

    December 21, 2011TDOM<small style="color: rgb(56, 56, 56); font: normal normal bold 0.71em/normal Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; text-transform: uppercase; ">FEMINISM, FEMINIST GOVERNANCE</small>
    SCUM Manifested

    The Hate-Filled Legacy of Valerie Solanas

    Radical feminism can be traced more or less back to Valerie Solanas, author of theSCUM Manifesto. It was first published in 1967, though Solanas began drafting it in about 1959 or 60. In the Manifesto, Solanas calls on women to rise up against men who she sees as biologically inferior and responsible for all of the world’s problems. However, she doesn’t end there. She refers to the male as “a biological accident” and the Y-chromosome as being an incomplete X-chromosome, making the male an incomplete female. She further calls for men to be exterminated and to assist in eliminating themselves by eliminating each other.
    There are those who have stated that this Manifesto is little more than a parody of “patriarchy” or a work of satire. They claim to view it as an anti-patriarchal statement, but state that the calls for the elimination of men should not be taken seriously. However, while the work may contain elements of parody and satire, these devices are used to emphasize the message, not to indicate that the author wasn’t serious. Solanas’ own history would indicate this as she shot pop artist Andy Warhol, art critic Mario Amaya, and attempted to shoot Warhol’s manager Fred Hughes on June 3, 1968, attempting to kill them. In 1977, she claimed that her views had not changed since the Manifesto was published, indicating that she believed what she had written.
    Further evidence that the SCUM Manifesto was to be taken seriously is found in the reaction of feminist leaders and organizations to Solanas’ Manifesto and shooting of Andy Warhol. Ti-Grace Atkinson, radical feminist and president of the New
  4. The Facts behind the SCUM Manifesto Conference..

    by , 16th-December-2011 at 03:19 AM

    The Facts behind the SCUM Manifesto Conference..

    Agent Orange Special Report no 2.

    With the exposure of the RADFEM Hub information, their discussions about gendercide (the killing of all men) and the SCUM Manifesto, one does wonder who those guest speakers were , who were involved in the three day SCUM Manifesto conference..

    Agent Orange, our Net Investigator appear to have hit on the identities of the speakers involved and also the organisers of the conference as well. Those who attended to discuss the annihilation of men and boys are listed below..

    As you can see the object of that conference is listed as above and also in the poster. One would have to question also as to who financed this conference and where was it held.

    Perth SCUM Conference and it's connection to Australian Academia

    Between September 23-25th, 2011, two members of the radical feminist hub and radfem forum, Danielle Elina Pynnonen (Allecto) and her partner, Big Brother UK 5 contestant Kat "Kitten Pinder (Amazon Mancrusher) organized and hosted a three day feminist conference in Perth Australia that they called the 'SCUM Conference'. They billed it as:

    "THRILL SEEKING FEMALES UNITE! Life in this society being, at best, an utter bore, this THREE DAY RADICAL FEMINIST CONFERENCE is for civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females who want to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation and destroy the male sex. Workshops, guest presenters and social activities, plus a space to celebrate and re-member the life and
  5. Verizon is the Monster..

    by , 4th-December-2011 at 01:04 AM

    Verizon is the Monster, DVMisinformation....

    Verizon's misinformation in their latest DV promotion demonstrates once again that telling the truth is not part of their overall agenda or strategy but promoting disinformation is..

    To blame Fathers solely for DV disregards and ignores the fact that Mothers are the greater child abusers and are also as abusive at domestic violence then her partner.. Verizon totally disregards, ignores this vital information and instead spreads male hate (misandry) instead..
    Domestic Violence will never be halted by stopping only one partner from fighting while the other has carte blanche. This sexist attitude and discrimination against Fathers has to stop as it will never solve anything..

    It just ensures that feminists and Verizon will be able to continually promote their lies and misinformation at will, while publicly funded by your hard earned tax dollars..

    Verizon in the Monster in the Room..

    The Verizon Foundation and the National Domestic Violence Hotline Team Up for Some Man-Hating
    Harry Crouch
    December 1, 2011

    “I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them.” — Robin Morgan – former president of the National Ourganization for Women (NOW) and editor of MS magazine
    Last week we became aware of the Verizon Foundation’s and National Domestic Violence Hotline’s video Monsters.
    We mailed and/or emailed 28 leaders of both organizations an open letter strenuously objecting to their outrageous man-hating video.
    Before reading the letter we sent both those organizations or more of what is below please watch or re watch the video.
    Now that you have seen it or seen it again ask yourself if you can imagine yourself in the room full of people
  6. Men Do NOT owe Women a Living..

    by , 4th-December-2011 at 12:45 AM
    This may come as a shock to many but it is inevitably the case. We owe women a living like a forest owes the ground, we are not talking symbiosis here. Feminists rely on that false premise in order to make unreasonable demands and justify their disgusting behaviour..

    December 2, 2011


    The ontology of female supremacism

    I have concluded elsewhere that men as a group owe no special collective favor to women as a group, any more than Democrats as a group would owe any special collective favor to Republicans as a group. In view of the objective political situation of men in Western civilization, such is the only conclusion to which moral consistency would lend itself.
    However, I know that plenty of feminists would take issue upon this point. And being feminists, they can do no less. If they agreed with this way of thinking, they would no longer be feminists. And why? Because the entire feminist enterprise is constructed around the overarching and atmospherically all-pervading premise that men are the problem. This is so because feminism is a hate-fueled, anti-male, female-supremacist movement, and such a movement couldn’t possibly embrace the view that men and women are BOTH the problem. No, that wouldn’t work – it would bust their gearbox all to hell!
    The fruits of feminism bespeak an enterprise embued with the spirit of moral rapacity…

    If in fact men are the problem as feminism supposes, and consequently that women are not, then it would follow that men specifically are under some form of obligation which would translate as a debt owed to women. And such indeed summarizes the general wind that has wafted from the direction of feminism and spread widely into other quarters. That is why I say that the feminists would take issue with the
  7. Grant County District Attorney Lisa Riniker : Sexist Bigot..

    by , 30th-November-2011 at 11:38 AM
    Grant County District Attorney Lisa Riniker : Sexist Bigot..

    Grant County District Attorney Lisa Riniker : Sexist Bigot..


    Last week the parents of a Wisconsin boy sued Grant County District Attorney Lisa Riniker for charging their son with first-degree sexual assault, a Class B felony, after he played "butt doctor" with a 5-year-old girl. He was 6 at the time. When the boy's lawyer tried to have the charge dismissed, Riniker replied: "The legislature could have put an age restriction in the statute if it wanted to. The legislature did no such thing."According to the complaint (PDF), the girl is "the daughter of a well-known political figure in Grant County," and her brother, who is the same age, also was involved in playing doctor but was not charged. In addition to Riniker, the lawsuit names as defendants retired Grant County Sheriff's Sgt. James Kopp and Jan Moravits, an investigator with Grant County Social Services "whose regional the political figure's wife's sister-in-law"—i.e., the aunt of the alleged victim.Although the boy, now 7, is too young to be prosecuted or named in a juvenile delinquency petitition, reports, county officials are using the felony charge to force his parents into accepting "protection or services" for him. The lawsuit says that once he turns 18, he will be listed as a sex offender.I noted a similar case in my July Reasonstory on sex offender laws.
    Welcome to the real world as feminists and their promoted "legislation" condemns a six year old boy for playing doctor. Something I did myself at that age, kids are naturally inquisitive. But with the current laws in place and it was done, not out of malice, it was just out of the "I'll show you mine if you show me yours"
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Donate to AntiMisandry

1e2 Forum