PIV, RADFEM Hub, Hugo and Other Nefarious Deeds.. Womyn's Stuff apparently..
On numerous occasions, the RADFEM Hub feminist members speak of a festival called the 'Michigan Womyn's Music Festival', a popular occasion, their Mecca, amongst lesbian feminists and strictly off limits to transvestites ofcourse, as they hate them with a passion, as they are not "real" women as far as they are concerned..
As a matter of fact, even being (or have been at any time in the past) in a heterosexual relationship has your browny marks reduced to zero. That would be contamination as far as they are concerned. Those radical feminists, who is part of the Feminist Movement, are really just an inevitable response of a movement that promotes hate and malice to anyone outside their own sex..
In order to witness the sickening loathing and hate they generate, one would not have to look long at their endless rantings. Part of their mindless programs begin with the total annihilation of an entire sex which one wonders if that is not self-destroying and self defeating, but that has escaped their mindless raging as they continually discuss methods of completing that task..
Bare in mind too, that Pamela O'Shaughnessy is a member of this group under the guise of Karma. Her maniacal lecturing and support for the extermination of all males is not restricted to adults as she includes the introduction of eugenics (just like that dictator did) into her many and varied recommendations and long term goals..
There would not be a site or forum on the net that would surpass the deep seated hate and maniacal loathing of these women, these feminist females have for the opposite sex..
Here is a sample of the deep seated loathing that "pretend" feminists ignore and deny.. Disrespect is crucial. Disrespect for the cultures, values and institutions of male domination is the very foundation and sine qua non of feminism. Since religion is crucial to the construction of cultural norms in every culture, disrespect for it should be the natural amniotic fluid of feminist thought and activism.Sheila Jeffreys is an academic and writer, originally from London, who teaches in Australia. She has been a rad fem activist for 38 years.So moving on, we have Hugo Schwyzer organising "Slutwalk LA" for the simple reason of having plenty of young, nubile, willing females on hand, for him to practise (as the feminist call it, PIV- penis in vagina) sex with them. An accusation he has not only verified himself but blatantly brags about on his blog. What a great example for an almost "human being"..
Here is an article penned by one of the lunatic fringe members at RADFEM Hub called " Steering the Sluts", apply named I thought.. Steering the Sluts: Prof. Hugo Schwyzer Organizes Los Angeles SlutWalk
self-identified feminist man and fun-fem darling hugo schwyzer reports on his blog that he is ”proud to be a part” of the steering committee organizing the los angeles SlutWalk, scheduled to take place june 4, 2011.
according to professor schwyzer, “We’re marching to reclaim a word, we’re marching to declare zero tolerance for harassment and sexual abuse, we’re marching in defense of the basic notion that whatever women wear and whomever they sleep with,
And for those who are of the opinion that Schwyzer has any scruples at all..FCM (Hello Mindy).... hugo admits on his blog that he “used to” have PIV with female students (including on his professorial-office desk) during what he euphemistically refers to as his “acting out years.” what a rebel! a college professor, teaching womens studies and womens history to women, acting out his aggressions and dysfunctions on the bodies of his female students by having PIV with them,A great example of pure hypocrisy. Schwyzer is in it for the sex (PIV) and female attention, just like most feminist men are.. Lesbian separatist feminism at Michigan Womyn’s music festival Kath Browne <address style="border-bottom-width: 0px; border-color: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width:
Updated 21st-December-2011 at 03:01 PM by christianj
09.jpg Verizon is the Monster, DVMisinformation.... Verizon's misinformation in their latest DV promotion demonstrates once again that telling the truth is not part of their overall agenda or strategy but promoting disinformation is.. To blame Fathers solely for DV disregards and ignores the fact that Mothers are the greater child abusers and are also as abusive at domestic violence then her partner.. Verizon totally disregards, ignores this vital information and instead spreads male hate (misandry) instead..
Domestic Violence will never be halted by stopping only one partner from fighting while the other has carte blanche. This sexist attitude and discrimination against Fathers has to stop as it will never solve anything..
It just ensures that feminists and Verizon will be able to continually promote their lies and misinformation at will, while publicly funded by your hard earned tax dollars..
Verizon in the Monster in the Room.. The Verizon Foundation and the National Domestic Violence Hotline Team Up for Some Man-Hating Harry Crouch
December 1, 2011 “I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them.” — Robin Morgan – former president of the National Ourganization for Women (NOW) and editor of MS magazine Last week we became aware of the Verizon Foundation’s and National Domestic Violence Hotline’s video Monsters. We mailed and/or emailed 28 leaders of both organizations an open letter strenuously objecting to their outrageous man-hating video. Before reading the letter we sent both those organizations or more of what is below please watch or re watch the video. Now that you have seen it or seen it again ask yourself if you can imagine yourself in the room full of people who conjured up this video. How many people do you see? How many meetings were there? Which million dollar conference rooms were used in Verizon and NDVH buildings? How many men and how many women were in the conferences? Try to imagine all that and the conversations that led to the production of this horrific misandric boy bashing video. I cannot come close to imagining myself in such a room, being surrounded by however many people were there all blinded by some ill conceived and irrational ideology that drives them to the conclusion that only boys grow tall to become abusers. These people are either ignorant or hateful or both. If ignorant they can be educated, if hate filled ideologues with hidden agendas there is little or no reason to believe reality and truth will have any bearing on their self-serving idiocy. And, wouldn’t you like to know that one someone, the first person in this group of man-hating sociopathic pariahs that came up with the idea for Monsters?
If challenged that person and her defenders will deny, justify, rationalize, and blame it on a kid, the little girl, if she really exists, whose ugly vision this video purportedly shares. I sure would, I want to know. Then could put on a full court press to get whoever it was fired, if not somehow imprisoned. You won’t see this video on network television, it’s a weird length ill suited to program scheduling. It will live on the Internet and be proudly shown around the country at domestic violence council meetings; used for training public safety officers, forced on the military for awareness training, and paraded at fundraising events put on by domestic violence shelters, family justice centers, and even struggling university women studies programs. Oh, and yes, it will be introduced into our schools perhaps even as early as first grade. This video has the potential for spreading harm and hate for decades. It has to be stopped, withdrawn, and destroyed. Please help. Our letter includes the mailing address, email addresses, and even some phone numbers to those that have the power to stop this pure propaganda mind-warping travesty of a video. Write letters, send emails, and make phone calls to your legislators too; also, your local Verizon company executives and newspapers. Please feel free to reprint our letter and mail or email it, turn it into handouts, flyers and so forth. Also, please distribute a link to this page to as many people as you can. Become part of the solution and help us help others protect our children and future generations by ensuring this video is pulled from the Internet, is not distributed, and destroyed. How is it we allow such hate-mongers to gain such power? I just don’t get it. Source: NCFM strenuously objects to the Verizon Foundation and the National Domestic Violence Hotline teaming up for some man-hating | National Coalition For Men (NCFM)
This may come as a shock to many but it is inevitably the case. We owe women a living like a forest owes the ground, we are not talking symbiosis here. Feminists rely on that false premise in order to make unreasonable demands and justify their disgusting behaviour.. December 2, 2011
FidelbogenSHORT UPDATES The ontology of female supremacism I have concluded elsewhere that men as a group owe no special collective favor to women as a group, any more than Democrats as a group would owe any special collective favor to Republicans as a group. In view of the objective political situation of men in Western civilization, such is the only conclusion to which moral consistency would lend itself.
However, I know that plenty of feminists would take issue upon this point. And being feminists, they can do no less. If they agreed with this way of thinking, they would no longer be feminists. And why? Because the entire feminist enterprise is constructed around the overarching and atmospherically all-pervading premise that men are the problem. This is so because feminism is a hate-fueled, anti-male, female-supremacist movement, and such a movement couldn’t possibly embrace the view that men and women are BOTH the problem. No, that wouldn’t work – it would bust their gearbox all to hell! The fruits of feminism bespeak an enterprise embued with the spirit of moral rapacity…
If in fact men are the problem as feminism supposes, and consequently that women are not, then it would follow that men specifically are under some form of obligation which would translate as a debt owed to women. And such indeed summarizes the general wind that has wafted from the direction of feminism and spread widely into other quarters. That is why I say that the feminists would take issue with the idea that male and female are political parties: because it implies that men and women are equal cutthroat gangs competing equally to cut each other’s throats. The feminists would favor a scenario in which one of those gangs (men) would bare its collective throat voluntarily to the gang wielding the knife.
But what does it mean to say that “men are the problem”? What is this statement really driving at? Which “problem” does it refer to, exactly? I have implied that this idea lies at the root of a world-view. A paradigm. But how can we spot it in action? What signs or tracks does it leave?
Here is what to look for: any time a woman does something notably blameworthy, or any time something goes awry between a man and a woman, a feminist will nearly always search for a way to either get the woman off the hook, or reduce her share of blame to a barebones minimum. Female wrongdoing will always be extenuated in whatever way possible, if not denied altogether.
The bias is persistently male-negative. It is evasionary of any realization, or any frank admission, that women in the depth of their nature are just as rotten as men. You can almost hear the female-justification hamster spinning its little wheel into overdrive in the backs of feminist heads, any time the least shadow of womanly or girlish malfeasance confronts them. They are not a bit concerned to know what actually IS; rather, they fervently wish to know what, according to their template, must be. It is a deeply rooted emotional reflex which transfixes the core of their world like a pivot or an axle or a black-hole singularity. IN FACT, LET’S GIVE IT A NAME.
Let’s call it the “must-be” maneuver. Yes! This little trick is the alpha and omega, the sum and substance, the necessary precondition for everything that feminism seeks to put about in the world. It must be that a man is to blame in every argument, it must be that he doesn’t listen, it must be that he is insensitive to her needs, it must be that he is using male privilege, it must be that he has control issues, it must be that he has anger management issues, it must be that he is “condescending” her, it must be that he feels threatened by intelligent women, it must be that she was violent in self-defense or if not, it must be that she attacked him pre-emptively. On it goes.
And should it prove impractical to pin the blame on a particular man, it is always possible to fall back upon men or maleness in the abstract: it must be the patriarchy which oppressed her into lying, killing, cheating, stealing or stumbling! It must be male-dominated power structures which drove her to anorexia or smashed her head against a glass ceiling!
Inherent to the must-be maneuver is the exclusion of examination. A commonsense, rough-and-ready calculus might suggest to the layman that male input is to blame in at most half of the suggested cases, and that prior to concluding what must be, we should interrogate
Grant County District Attorney Lisa Riniker : Sexist Bigot.. Grant County District Attorney Lisa Riniker : Sexist Bigot..
Solaris.. Last week the parents of a Wisconsin boy sued Grant County District Attorney Lisa Riniker for charging their son with first-degree sexual assault, a Class B felony, after he played "butt doctor" with a 5-year-old girl. He was 6 at the time. When the boy's lawyer tried to have the charge dismissed, Riniker replied: "The legislature could have put an age restriction in the statute if it wanted to. The legislature did no such thing."According to the complaint (PDF), the girl is "the daughter of a well-known political figure in Grant County," and her brother, who is the same age, also was involved in playing doctor but was not charged. In addition to Riniker, the lawsuit names as defendants retired Grant County Sheriff's Sgt. James Kopp and Jan Moravits, an investigator with Grant County Social Services "whose regional supervisor...is the political figure's wife's sister-in-law"—i.e., the aunt of the alleged victim.Although the boy, now 7, is too young to be prosecuted or named in a juvenile delinquency petitition, Madison.com reports, county officials are using the felony charge to force his parents into accepting "protection or services" for him. The lawsuit says that once he turns 18, he will be listed as a sex offender.I noted a similar case in my July Reasonstory on sex offender laws.Welcome to the real world as feminists and their promoted "legislation" condemns a six year old boy for playing doctor. Something I did myself at that age, kids are naturally inquisitive. But with the current laws in place and it was done, not out of malice, it was just out of the "I'll show you mine if you show me yours" childhood prank and caters to the natural interest that children have.
Now that normal behaviour is regarded as a felony..
Something else you can thank feminists for.. Link..