Hello and welcome to our community! Is this your first visit?
Register
Please register or sign in to remove these advertisements.
View RSS Feed

Media Bites

  1. (Must Read!) This Way To The Revolution — by Erin Pizzey

    by , 1 Week Ago at 01:24 PM
    In 1971, Erin Pizzey founded the world's first battered women's shelter in Chiswick, England. In this memoir of her 1977 tour of the United States, Erin recounts how her efforts were misused by Gloria Steinem, Lenore Walker, and others, in furtherance of their political agenda.

    Angry feminists shot her dog, sent her death threats and drove her to hiding. This is just one instance of the history of violence in feminism.

    MUST READ: Erin Pizzey — This Way To The Revolution

    Updated 6 Days Ago at 08:08 PM by nomereape

    Categories
    feminism , Legal Matters , Political Issues , Media Bites , Fathers
  2. NoMereApe's Resources — Make More Mirrors Please!

    by , 1 Week Ago at 02:19 AM
    Here, you'll find links to various resources that you can download instantly. All these files are hosted on my server.

    I will update the list as time permits.

    Feminism

    Feminist distortion of truth:



    Education System

    Discrimination against boys in schools:


    Women's Studies textbooks are "Anti-Male" bibles:



    Health Concerns

    The dangerous drugging of boys:


    Circumcision, male genital mutiliation:



    Domestic Violence


    For full bibliography (currently work in progress!), go to Bibliography: Domestic Violence at Feministed.

    Gender symmetry in domestic violence:


    Feminist DV lies and the failure of DV programs:

    ...

    Updated 1 Week Ago at 01:36 PM by nomereape

    Categories
    Fathers , feminism , Legal Matters , Political Issues , Media Bites
  3. Just suppose: turning the tables on immaculate deception

    by , 1st-August-2012 at 03:00 PM
    Quote Quote from dinohip51 View Post
    Let's try an exercise, anyone game?

    Okay, just pretend a major web provider and news outlet published an article in the Sports section with a headline saying,

    HIGH-FIVE TO SUPERDAD: "I PUNCHED A HOLE IN HER DIAPHRAGM AND I'D DO IT AGAIN"

    , and quoting our hero at multi-paragraph length on how the little gal just didn't really know what she wanted, and once she could just hold that baby she got over her, being female and all, weakness and some silly girlish notion that she could live as she chose. In fact, the poor ignorant thing actually left him for a year because she didn't want to get pregnant, but (of course, a guy can promise a girl anything, and should if it gets her back where she belongs) after he assured her it was okay if they didn't have a child together, he talked it over in the steam room at the club with a buddy who was like, "dude, just take a pin and put a tiny little hole in that fucker. She'll never know what hit her..."

    Et cetera.

    It may be tough, but let's just play it out. Anyone? Anyone?

    Updated 1st-August-2012 at 03:07 PM by Rof L Mao Esq (change title)

    Categories
    Fathers , feminism , Legal Matters , Political Issues , Media Bites
  4. Video Games, Harassment, Anita Sarkessian and Male-safe spaces

    by , 19th-June-2012 at 12:02 PM
    For starters, a confession/disclaimer: I used to play games online, and after rampant cheating, even on Valve's Steam service, I've given it up. Even when I did play, I didn't play much. I've played solo MUCH more, so I'm reasonably comfortable discussing video games and gaming culture in some detail, and with considerable confidence. I've distanced myself from video games a lot over the past two or three years, so while I am somewhat dated, the roots still run deep. Plus, real life can be far more awesome, but that's a discussion for another day.

    At Penny Arcade Expo (PAX) 2012, a well-attended panel gathered together a group of female gamers to discuss the harassment that women undergo when they venture into the cesspool of human behavior that is X-Box Live specifically, but also internet gaming in general. These women paint a stark picture of the harassment and misogyny that female gamers experience when they play with others over the internet. As evidence, they've collected thousands of examples of sexually themed harassment at: ht tp://www.notinthekitchenanymore.com/ and ht tp://fatuglyorslutty.com/. (Links deliberately broken) Truly, the examples showcase some deeply disturbing behavior which cuts across all age levels and races, and sometimes even gender. A number of explanations have been offered for this phenomena. The anonymity of the internet, the immaturity of the average X-Box Live users, thirteen year old boys, institutionalized misogyny, rape culture etc.

    In the same spirit, Anita Sarkeesian, feminist pop-culture critic recently launched a Kick-Starter campaign to fund a project which is going to examine the portrayal of women in video-games, and female video-game tropes. I haven't paid much attention, but this project was reportedly trolled mercilessly by the usual internet suspects. What I HAVE been paying attention to is the parade of feminists, white-knights and manginas who've come screaming out of the woodwork to "speak out" against this behavior. See:

    ht tp://www.upworthy.com/nailed-it-if-youre-a-dude-on-the-internet-you-need-to-see-this-video?c=bl3
    ht tp://penny-arcade.com/patv/episode/harassment
    ht tp://xbox.about.com/od/buyersguide/a/xbltips4girls.htm
    ht tp://bbneves.com/2012/06/online-harassment-misogyny/

    for starters. Nothing to see here for the seasoned MRA. Or is there?

    In all of these examples, the usual feminist suspects have been quick to denounce this behavior, though their explanations for this behavior have been utterly bereft of genuine incite or understanding. Nobody, except perhaps Bernard Chapin and possibly other MRA's have bothered to even speculate on why this issue is an issue at all. In other words, why this is happening is of no interest to the white-knight brigade, they only care insofar as ending this behavior. Given what Chapin has said, this seems like a pipe-dream, but never bother a white-knight while he's making an ass of himself.

    So why is this happening? Does the internet naturally make people into misogynists? Not quite, but the culture of internet gaming is one of the few remaining spaces of safety for men, and men are reacting very negatively to again, being forced to yield yet another of their safe spaces to the politically correct feminist machine and their white-knight enablers. What's more astonishing on the surface, but understandable in detail is how feminists for all their eye-rolling pseudo-intellectual rhetoric have failed to understand the real reason for this, that being the invasion of yet another space that was safe for men and unabashed, untamed masculinity. I've witnessed this same raw, overt masculine behavior before in yet another safe male space "adult entertainment" clubs. Like the internet, a club where exotic dancers congregate is one of the few spaces where our misandric society is willing to tolerate overt masculinity. Within one of these spaces, both the internet, and a strip bar, a man is free to act out, be boisterous, cheer, to say and do things that he isn't permitted to do normally in modern western society. Indeed, there are few, if any of these safe male places remaining. As women began to penetrate previously male exclusive spaces, the percentage of spaces where a man could feel free to express himself became less and less, and I believe that the masculinity he desired to express became increasingly overt. As there were fewer and fewer places where a man could be a man, the few places that remained called for more hyper-masculine behavior, until the eventual result is the mess that is X-Box Live. Female gamers are a very recent phenomena, and their invasion of X-Box Live in particular and internet gaming in general has resulted in a considerable backlash. Some of the rampant misogyny is intended as simply the kind of trash-talk that the men share with each other even when ...
    Categories
    feminism , Media Bites
  5. reality really bites

    by , 18th-June-2012 at 11:02 PM
    Reality of misandry really hurts, even someone who isn't male. I've been watching a couple of talk shows and others today and I've never really been as emotional as I was now. It hurts to know that we all have been instilled with the "don't ever put your hands on a woman" line even if they hit you. I know never to put my hands on anyone, male or female but what makes me tear up at the moment is that why is it okay for women to put their hands on a man but not the other way around?

    Why do they need to be coddled so much? It hurts and it pisses me off. Someone answer why. I cannot stop thinking of those male abuse victims. They could never put their hands on a woman because they need to be protected. Everyone needs protection from violence.
    Categories
    feminism , Media Bites
  6. Canada's only men's DV shelter may close due to lack of funding

    by , 9th-May-2012 at 08:38 PM
    NCFM Calgary Liaison Earl Silver’s shelter for abused men faces closure


    Earl Silverman, founder of the Men’s Alternative Safe House (MASH 4077), says the shelter for men who have been abused by women is set to close because of a lack of funding and government support.
    It was supposed to help address a veneered problem in our community, but Earl Silverman, founder of the Men’s Alternative Safe House (MASH 4077) in Calgary, says the city’s only shelter for men who have been abused by women will soon shut its doors for good.
    “If I don’t have a influx of money in four to six months it’s closed,” Silverman says.
    According to Statistics Canada’s recent Family Violence in Canada profile, self-reported acts of spousal violence were almost equal between men and women nationwide. In Alberta, eight percent of women in relationships reported some type of spousal abuse in the past five years, whereas six percent of men had reported domestic violence during the same period. However, women were about three times more likely to be victims of spousal homicide than men.
    Silverman, who was once a victim of female perpetrated domestic abuse, says he had hoped MASH would bring light to the fact almost half of all family violence victims in Canada are “under-served,” but social stigmas run deep. “To recognize that a man is a victim is to recognize that a woman perpetrated it, and society is not open to that possibility,” he says.
    In the two years since MASH opened, Silverman claims more than 30 men (some with children) have been helped at his shelter. MASH receives no government funding; Silverman and a business partner have been funding the operation out of their own pockets and with the help of a few private donations.
    Silverman says his partner is moving on to other endeavours and he’s currently unemployed, making the increasing financial strain to keep MASH going unmanageable. He says he’s tried to get provincial funding for MASH more than six times but the process is unproductive and each time the government tells him there’s “no demonstrated need” for a men’s shelter in Calgary.
    Christina Bruce, spokesperson with Alberta Human Services says the provincial government has made a continued effort to help male victims of domestic violence and that many public resources, including family abuse shelters, are available to men.
    PLEASE CONTACT EARL, SEND HIM SOME MONEY, HELP HIM KEEP OPEN THE ONLY SHELTER FOR ABUSED MEN IN CANADA


    NCFM Calgary Liaison Earl Silver’s shelter for abused men faces closure | National Coalition For Men (NCFM)
  7. Bias in Education, What BIAS..

  8. The Perfect woman

    by
    Ten
    , 7th-April-2012 at 08:04 PM
    A good article on Sonja´s blog, where she analyzes Dr. House´s episode "Skin Deep", when Dr. House says,

    “The perfect woman, is a man.”

    Fairly enough analyzed indeed. Good job Sonja.

    It´s like that rad feminists want in fact to be men, when they say they want equal rights. Penis envy and all that stuff, hun?...

    No offense to women, but women will never be men, or vice-versa.

    Women may not have perfect lives, and may be loaded with work, etc, but men don´t have perfect lives either. Much of the institutionalized norms as marriage, family, go against some basic traits of men, and married man subject themselves to it. Worst than some normal conflicts in marriage, is an over abusive wife, and an emasculated husband. Now that´s an abomination.

    Updated 7th-April-2012 at 08:21 PM by Ten (Unfinished editing)

    Categories
    feminism , Media Bites
  9. The Perfect Man

    by
    Ten
    , 7th-April-2012 at 07:40 PM
    I found this poem on the web, and it´s like the perfect, hilarious wake up call to man-hating women:

    THE PERFECT MAN


    The perfect man is gentle
    Never cruel or mean
    He has a beautiful smile
    And keeps his face so clean.


    The perfect man likes children
    And will raise them by your side
    He will be a good father
    As well as a good husband to his bride.


    The perfect man loves cooking
    Cleaning and vacuuming too
    He'll do anything in his power
    To convey his feelings of love to you.


    The perfect man is sweet
    Writing poetry from your name
    He's a best friend to your mother
    And kisses away your pain.


    He never has made you cry
    Or hurt you in any way
    Oh, forget this stupid poem


    "
    "
    "


    The perfect man is gay!!!!

    It´s like that saying, "boys will be boys", otherwise, probably, you already know...

    P.s. I´m actually gay, but that doesn´t mean I support women´s delusions and flaws. In fact, I´m all for men, as I am one myself.
    Categories
    Media Bites
  10. What Posesses a Man to Vote for a Woman..

    by , 21st-February-2012 at 05:29 AM
    What Posesses a Man to Vote for a Woman..



    This has always been a rather interesting phenomena to me. What possible advantage is there for any male to vote for a female in order to have her installed into office. Why do men sacrifice their vote to implant a member of the opposite sex into office just so she can ensure that his needs and requirements are totally ignored and only female entitlement is guaranteed on a far greater scale than it is right now..

    Why would one install someone in office who has repeatedly demonstrated that when push comes to shove, she will side with her own sex and ensure that only the wishes and entitlements are ensured for her own sex only..

    Surely, as we have witnessed this sufficiently over the years, women do not give a stuff about men. Whenever there is a choice to be made, when legislation calls for equal treatment or to pander to their own sex, they automatically vote for their own. That action has been demonstrated over and over again and has been glaringly obvious for decades. There is no automatic switch in the female brain that makes that change or makes it even a consideration. Female office holders have always and with regularity, demonstrated that they do not give a damn about our sex and are there solely to benefit their own..

    So why the stupidity, why the ignorance and why the denial. Most men have a good and reasonable understanding about politics and have some inkling about what the candidate stands for. Takes some effort in checking the credentials and past attitudes and behavior of those candidates. Why is it that that same methodology is not used on female candidates. What possible motive does one have to vote a female into office knowing full well or is even guaranteed that that female will bias her own at the expense of the male voter..

    We have already seen and witnessed this so often as politician chase the vagina vote and just take the male vote for granted. Do you like being taken for granted and why can so many women automatically count on your vote when the outcome will be the standard ca-sera-sera(what ever will be)..

    Nothing will or is going to change while we keep voting them into office without holding them to account for their anti-male behaviour. On top of that, have a good look at the actions of women generally and specifically. The majority of male haters, as 99.9% of feminists are women. The majority of the laws that have been introduced of the last few decades that violates men's rights have been produced by women. The entire sexual abuse/assault industry is run by women and they have also been involved in introducing laws that take away men's rights. It has been women who have joined together and ensured that only they are favoured and we have been tossed to the scrap heap and here you are voting them into office to keep repeating the same thing over and over..

    You really do need to change your thinking paradigm in regards to female office holders and at least check to see whether or not it's an anti-male, pro-female candidate or not. It is the absolute least you could do..

    Oh, you need a few examples -

    Sarah(I am a feminist) Palin..US
    Nancy (feminist) Pelosi..US
    Hillary (feminist) Clinton..US
    Harriet (feminist) Harman..EN
    Lynne (feminist) Featherstone..EN
    Julia (feminist) Gillard..AUS
    Tanya (feminist) Plibersek..AUS

    Just to mention a few and name me one single working effort or deed or legislation that any of these women have introduced that benefit or assist or helps men in any way, shape or form.

    Just one..
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
1e2 Forum

LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO