Greetings!! Is this your first visit? If so, please consider registering. It enables downloads and removal of adverts. Use the 'facebook connect' for quick access.
Register
View RSS Feed

Media Bites

  1. Women are not more emotional than men

    by , 14th-June-2014 at 10:53 AM (Official AM Blog)
    As part of the experiment, participants also had to rate the content on a questionnaire to say how it made them feel. As expected, women said they felt more emotional in response to the content compared to the men. However, even though men reported feeling less emotion than women, their physiological changes showed that in fact they felt emotion more strongly.

    “This study suggests that men feel emotion just as much as women, sometimes more strongly, but are less willing to express these emotions openly due to expectations put on them by society.”
    I've always enjoyed how studies by non-feminist groups that clearly don't have a hateful agenda manage to actually say something nice about men once in a while.. and women too, I'm sure. Every time there's a feminist 'study' you can bet your last dollar that the findings will be along the lines of "women are victims", "men are to blame" or "women are better than men". Always. Guaranteed. Without fail. Try it - place a bet and watch as your winnings come rolling in.

    And to finish off with a high, watch this heart-warming video by Dove... about time too, Dove have spent years telling society how only women matter - thanks Dove for finally acknowledging men.


    New research shows men are more emotional than women
    Categories
    Media Bites
  2. Promoting "gender equality"

    by , 21st-March-2014 at 05:53 PM
    I noticed a poster advertising an information event about a new package of EU funds available for use in Ireland. People could apply for grants from this budget to fund projects that would create jobs or training initiatives, and help provide housing for the homeless. Finally, I thought, at least something is being done to help those people that need it most. I went to the event already wondering if I would be able to re-think my opinion of those stuffy mandarins in Brussels. Maybe I shouldn’t have been so cynical.

    There was a large banner over the entrance. “The European Social Fund” it read. “Promoting Gender Equality in Ireland.”……… Ah!

    The cavernous hall was dotted with little stalls, staffed, mostly by women who worked for various pointless government agencies. Pride of place was given predictably enough, to the National Women’s Council of Ireland whose success in its long history of promoting “gender equality” was evident by the fact that of the hundreds of people in the hall, there were only a handful of men.

    Having initiated conversations with some of the people (personing) these stands, it soon became apparent that most of them were the usual brainwashed box-tickers who had undoubtedly gotten their jobs through affirmative action initiatives, and that none of them would have lasted 24 hours in a job where they were actually expected to do anything.

    I walked over to the Women’s Aid stall, festooned with pictures of brutish men and bruised, frightened women and children. “Home is where Fear Lives,” was the cheerful message.

    It was quite obvious why there were no men at the event. Hidden in one corner behind the European Woman’s Fund, was a little stand staffed by one lost looking elderly woman from Threshold; the one organisation represented, that actually does try to help people, without checking first to make sure that they don’t have penises.


    A woman from the Irish Council
    ...
  3. From my cold dead wallet

    by , 21st-February-2014 at 08:32 AM (Legal Research Facts: The Child Support Enforcement Treadmill.)
    antimisandry.com - Legal Research Facts: The Child Support Enforcement Treadmill. - Blogs

    My first chance to add the up and coming legal proceeding:


    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CLEVELAND COUNTY
    STATE OF OKLAHOMA

    DAVID COX, )
    PLAINTIFF ) THIS IS THE NEXT
    )
    )

    )
    STATE OF OKLAHOMA,
    DEFENDANTS,

    1 )2 )3 )5 )
    6 )

    Updated 21st-February-2014 at 08:42 AM by eagle2feather

    Categories
    Political Issues , Media Bites , Fathers , Legal Matters
  4. The Mask You Live In

    by , 3rd-February-2014 at 02:58 PM
    Has anyone watched "The Mask You Live In" trailer by The Representation Project? As I watched the trailer I have to say that I was kinda moved, because they presented their message in such an "empowering" way. I wanted to know some of your opinions on the trailer, since The Representation Project had also been known for their 2011 documentary film, Miss Representation which had many Feminist leanings. I'll leave a link down below.
    Categories
    Media Bites
  5. On White Sprinters & Female CEO's - MWM

    by , 15th-January-2014 at 03:40 AM (Official AM Blog)



    If we need more women chief executives, do we also need more white sprinters in the Olympic 100m?


    The clamour is deafening and relentless for more women in everything, but in all the furore led by women's groups, does bigotry rear its ugly head? This film assesses the merit of quotas for women executives by looking at the prison population, black Olympic sprinters and the human brain.

    Features:
    Steve Moxon, author of 'The Woman Racket'.
    Mike Buchanan, author and UK party leader of 'Justice for men and boys (and the women who love them)' -- http://j4mb.org.uk
    Oliver Curry, Evolutionary psychologist, London School of Economics.
    Erin Pizzey, author and Domestic Violence expert.

    Photo credits:
    "Usain Bolt winning the 100m final 2008 Olympics" by PhotoBobil is licensed under CC BY 2.0
    http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...lt_winning.jpg

    "Start of men's 100m" By Darren Wilkinson from Chester-le-Street, England is licensed under CC BY 2.0
    http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...inal_start.jpg


  6. I'm Offended!!!

    by , 12th-January-2014 at 10:37 PM
    I was arguing with a feminist where I work. It is an unfortunate habit of mine. Anyway, I shot down her assertion that women have traditionally been oppressed throughout history by pointing out some basic historical fact. Unable to counter my argument she went into feminist default mode. She said that she found my analysis of her argument "offensive" and added that I had made her feel "uncomfortable." Feminists never fail to do this in my experience. You will see them use the same tactic all over the internet all the time.

    The problem with feminism is that it is an ideology based on feelings and emotions rather than fact or logic. Most feminist theory can be quite easily dismantled by anyone with an IQ higher than 10. Feminists have long given up trying to debate like adults. They have for the most part accepted at some level that their theories are built on air and that they turn to dust very quickly whenever they encounter such patriarchal inconveniences as facts based on science or history.

    Some feminists will instinctively resort to screaming insults when confronted with the truth. The more practiced ones however, will almost always retreat behind their ever present barricade of victimhood. It's a cleaver strategy and it is facilitated by the politically correct culture that has pervaded every aspect of our society, partly thanks to feminism. It's all about everybody having some kind of divine right to feel good about themselves all the time; everybody's opinions are equally valid it seems no matter how monumentally idiotic their pronouncements may be. It is a culture that has stifled debate of any real value all over the western world.

    How many times do we see debates on important issues degenerating into childish competitions where both sides are trying to prove they are more "offended" than their opponents. In recent years in Ireland, debates on a whole range of issues from child-abuse to gay-marriage to immigration have
    ...
  7. Could a man get away with this bizarre behaviour?

    by , 12th-January-2014 at 01:31 PM (Official AM Blog)
    I think not, he'd be up in court for DV as it would be classed as 'controlling'... But it's fine when a woman does it.

    (function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_GB/all.js#xfbml=1"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
    Post by Cornelius Porter III.
    Categories
    Media Bites
  8. Stats collated by F4J

    by , 11th-January-2014 at 12:48 PM (Official AM Blog)
  9. Gender Discrimination Breakdown

  10. More Feminist Paranoia: Coming to your country soon.

    by , 7th-January-2014 at 01:34 AM
    Loathe as I am to include a link to the festering mountain of infantile tripe that is feministing.com I couldn't help being struck by the stupefying idiocy of this video.

    http://feministing.com/2013/12/23/ne...n-leering-men/

    The video shows men in public places allegedly “leering” at women. Yes when a man dares to look at a woman he finds attractive, he is "leering." The video is tagged with the words “rape culture” and “sexual harassment”. The video is an advertisement for TV in India that I can only assume is designed to shame men for having perfectly normal and natural sexual desires.

    But wait. None of the women in this video were sexually harassed, never mind raped. None of the men touched any of the women or interfered with them in any way. So what exactly is the point that this advert is trying to make? Are we now being told that men should not look at us? Are we being told that being looked at is being harassed? Are the makers of this video seriously trying to eliminate all forms of normal sexual expression?

    The advert made the point that when the men realized they had been caught looking at the women, they turned away self-consciously. Well of course they did. They instinctively averted their gaze because they did not want to be rude or intimidating. This is also normal human behavior. If men did not “leer” at women then the human species would be long since extinct.

    So if you are a "fit" looking guy and you feel a woman's eyes burning into you as you walk by, just remember that there's nothing wrong with that. It's only "leering" when men do it. It's only "oppressive" when men do it." Remember the first rule of feminism; it's only sexist when men do it.

    Men should not take this advert as an insult, no matter that it is meant to be. It is actually a tribute to their good manners and self control. It is further proof if any more is needed, that while most
    ...
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast

Donate to AntiMisandry

1e2 Forum