Recent Blogs Posts

Here, you'll find links to various resources that you can download instantly. All these files are hosted on my server.

I will update the list as time permits.

Feminism

Feminist distortion of truth:

• Schwartz, H. S. (2003). Chapter 1: Scenes from a Holy Sexual War. The Revolt of the Primitive — An Inquiry into the Roots of Political Correctness. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.

Education System

Discrimination against boys in schools:

• Cornwell, C. M., Mustard, D. B. & Van Parys, J. (2012). Non-cognitive Skills and the Gender Disparities in Test Scores and Teacher Assessments: Evidence from Primary School. Institute for the Study of Labor.
• Cornwell, C. M., Mustard, D. B. & Van Parys, J. (2011). Non-cognitive Skills and the Gender Disparities in Test Scores and Teacher Assessments: Evidence from Primary School. Institute for the Study of Labor. DP No. 5973.

Women's Studies textbooks are "Anti-Male" bibles:

• Stolba, C. (2002). Lying in a Room of One’s Own: How Women’s Studies Textbooks Miseducate Students. Independent Women's Forum.

Health Concerns

The dangerous drugging of boys:

• Stolzer, J. M. (2012). A Systematic Deconstruction of the “Disordered American Boy” Hypothesis. New Male Studies: An International Journal, 1, (3), pp. 77-95; 1839-7816.

Circumcision, male genital mutiliation:

• Geisheker, J .V. (2013) The Completely Unregulated Practice of Male Circumcision: Human Rights’ Abuse Enshrined in Law? New Male Studies: An International Journal, 2, (1), pp. 18-45; 1839-7816.
• Van Howe, R. S. (2013). Sexually Transmitted Infections and Male Circumcision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. ISRN Urology, 109846.
• Doctors Opposing Circumcision. (2008). International Human Rights Law and the Circumcision of Children. Special Report.
• Dalton, J. D. (2007). Male circumcision – see the harm to get a balanced picture. JMHG, 4, (3), pp. 312–317.

Domestic Violence

For full bibliography (currently work in progress!), go to Bibliography: Domestic Violence at Feministed.

Gender symmetry in domestic violence:

• Dutton, D. G. & White, K. R. (2013). Male Victims of Domestic Violence. New Male Studies: An International Journal, 2, (1), pp. 5-17; 1839-7816.
• Carney, M., Buttell, F. & Dutton, D. (2007). Women who perpetrate intimate partner violence: A review of the literature with recommendations for treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 108-115.
• Straus, M. A. (2006). Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 252-275.

Feminist DV lies and the failure of DV programs:

• SAVE. (2012). Most Domestic Violence Educational Programs Lack Accuracy, Balance, and Truthfulness. Special Report. Stop Abuse and Violent Environments.
• SAVE. (2011). Estimated National Expenditures For Domestic Violence Services and Programs. Special Report. Stop Abuse and Violent Environments.
• SAVE. (2011). Are Abuse Shelters Helping the True Victims of Domestic Violence? Special Report. Stop Abuse and Violent Environments.
• SAVE. (2011). The Use and Abuse of Domestic Restraining Orders. Special Report. Stop Abuse and Violent Environments.
• Heleniak, D. N. (2010). Erring on the Side of Hidden Harm: The Granting of Domestic Violence Restraining Orders. Partner Abuse, Vol. 1, No. 2. Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting.
• SAVE. (2010). Predominant Aggressor Policies: Leaving the Abuser Unaccountable? Special Report. Stop Abuse and Violent Environments.
• SAVE. (2010). How Effective are Domestic Violence Programs in Stopping Partner Abuse? Special Report. Stop Abuse and Violent Environments.
• SAVE. (2010). Incentives to Make False Allegations of Domestic Violence. Special Report. Stop Abuse and Violent Environments.
• SAVE. (2010). How False Allegations Harm Families and Children. Special Report. Stop Abuse and Violent Environments.
• SAVE. (2010). What is the Cost of False Allegations of Domestic Violence? Special Report. Stop Abuse and Violent Environments.
• SAVE. (2010). Domestic Violence Programs Discriminate Against Male Victims. Special Report. Stop Abuse and Violent Environments.
• SAVE. (2010). Arrest Policies for Domestic Violence. Special Report. Stop Abuse and Violent Environments.
• SAVE. (2010). Accountability and Oversight of Federally-Funded Domestic Violence Programs: Analysis and Recommendations. Special Report. Stop Abuse and Violent Environments.
• RADAR. (2009). Fifty Domestic Violence Myths. Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting.
• Straus, M. A. (2009). Current controversies and prevalence concerning female offenders of intimate partner violence: Why the overwhelming evidence of partner physical

...

Quote from dinohip51

Let's try an exercise, anyone game?

Okay, just pretend a major web provider and news outlet published an article in the Sports section with a headline saying,

HIGH-FIVE TO SUPERDAD: "I PUNCHED A HOLE IN HER DIAPHRAGM AND I'D DO IT AGAIN"

, and quoting our hero at multi-paragraph length on how the little gal just didn't really know what she wanted, and once she could just hold that baby she got over her, being female and all, weakness and some silly girlish notion that she could live as she chose. In fact, the poor ignorant thing actually left him for a year because she didn't want to get pregnant, but (of course, a guy can promise a girl anything, and should if it gets her back where she belongs) after he assured her it was okay if they didn't have a child together, he talked it over in the steam room at the club with a buddy who was like, "dude, just take a pin and put a tiny little hole in that fucker. She'll never know what hit her..."

Et cetera.

It may be tough, but let's just play it out. Anyone? Anyone?

NCFM Calgary Liaison Earl Silver’s shelter for abused men faces closure

Earl Silverman, founder of the Men’s Alternative Safe House (MASH 4077), says the shelter for men who have been abused by women is set to close because of a lack of funding and government support.

It was supposed to help address a veneered problem in our community, but Earl Silverman, founder of the Men’s Alternative Safe House (MASH 4077) in Calgary, says the city’s only shelter for men who have been abused by women will soon shut its doors for good.

“If I don’t have a influx of money in four to six months it’s closed,” Silverman says.

According to Statistics Canada’s recent Family Violence in Canada profile, self-reported acts of spousal violence were almost equal between men and women nationwide. In Alberta, eight percent of women in relationships reported some type of spousal abuse in the past five years, whereas six percent of men had reported domestic violence during the same period. However, women were about three times more likely to be victims of spousal homicide than men.

Silverman, who was once a victim of female perpetrated domestic abuse, says he had hoped MASH would bring light to the fact almost half of all family violence victims in Canada are “under-served,” but social stigmas run deep. “To recognize that a man is a victim is to recognize that a woman perpetrated it, and society is not open to that possibility,” he says.

In the two years since MASH opened, Silverman claims more than 30 men (some with children) have been helped at his shelter. MASH receives no government funding; Silverman and a business partner have been funding the operation out of their own pockets and with the help of a few private donations.

Silverman says his partner is moving on to other endeavours and he’s currently unemployed, making the increasing financial strain to keep MASH going unmanageable. He says he’s tried to get provincial funding for MASH more than six times but the process is unproductive and each time the government tells him there’s “no demonstrated need” for a men’s shelter in Calgary.

Christina Bruce, spokesperson with Alberta Human Services says the provincial government has made a continued effort to help male victims of domestic violence and that many public resources, including family abuse shelters, are available to men.

PLEASE CONTACT EARL, SEND HIM SOME MONEY, HELP HIM KEEP OPEN THE ONLY SHELTER FOR ABUSED MEN IN CANADA


NCFM Calgary Liaison Earl Silver’s shelter for abused men faces closure | National Coalition For Men (NCFM)

The following are quotes from the January 2010 Supreme Court ruling on Citizens United v Federal Election Commission:

If the First Amendment has any force, it prohibits Congress from fining or jailing citizens, or associations of citizens, for simply engaging in political speech.

All speakers, including individuals and the media, use money amassed from the economic marketplace to fund their speech. The First Amendment protects the resulting speech.

When Government seeks to use its full power, including the criminal law, to command where a person may get his or her information or what distrusted source he or she may not hear, it uses censorship to control thought. This is unlawful. The First Amendment confirms the freedom to think for ourselves.

(Source: supremecourt.gov)

Though the case before the court was regarding political financing and the use of mass media, the corollary outcome was the high court for the first time in its history equating money and financial disclosure with speech.

This logic creates a vast opening for dissenters toward both child support laws and income taxation, as it defines financial activity as being in the realm of freedom of expression and its protection under the First Amendment.

My argument here may be hard to follow, but the notion is that in the case of a child support order, one is expected not only to make a payment to a government agency, which the Court has held as being speech, but to disclose personal information to that agency about where one lives and earns one's money, which is also speech. If one believes that these items are none of government's business, refusing to disclose them is political speech, and protected under the First Amendment.

As to income taxation (another method, by the way, of controlling divorced fathers and men in general), my argument for decades has been that being required to disclose and submit personal information to government, along with money (which the Court has now equated with free speech), violates one's right not to speak, which is just another form of expression. When one says to government by not submitting tax forms (speech) or payments (also speech): "this information is none of your business", one is simply exercising one's freedom of expression. The Citizens United ruling by its own construct says government may not prevent this.

Give it a try. Hundreds of thousands of us refusing to have information, including money (which is speech) ordered and subpoenaed out of us just may get the attention of a system that tramples freedom of expression with impunity.

Female teachers tend to mark boys lower than they deserve and boys were less likely to work hard in their classes, the researchers found.

A gender gap favoring girls -- visible in the fourth grade -- grows worse with each passing year.

All girls school, one of hundreds..

I am blaming "the system" for this because we shouldn't be blaming young male students for the difficulties they face in what is arguably an increasingly female-programmed educational culture.

Pro female teaching positions..

Teachers banging boys charged..

Sexists Oprah Winfrey at her child abusing school..

Systemic pro-female teacher bias

Had Enough Therapy?: Why Are Boys Failing at School?

Where Did All the Male Teachers Go? France Worries That Boy Students May Be Suffering

All Female teachers at one school..

Brain deads walking a mile in princesses shoes..

A typical hypocrite..

"...any person, including a natural or foster parent, who, knowing that he or she has no privilege to do so or heedless in that regard, takes or entices any child under the age of eighteen years from the custody or care of the child's parents, guardian, or other lawful custodian or person with parental responsibilities with respect to the child commits a class 5 felony."
(Colorado Revised Statutes 18-3-304)


"Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the
state of Colorado or any of its political subdivisions because of sex."
(Colorado Constitution, Article II, §29 (1973))



With these laws on the books, my son was taken out of Colorado to a remote location in Montana by his mother and her relatives in 1998, and I did not see him again for almost two years. No law enforcement, prosecutorial or judicial action was taken in either state to my continuing complaints that this was an abduction in progress.

In subsequent custody proceedings, which it took those two years to convene, the question of his mother seizing custody by criminal means and unilateral parental decision-making with no court order empowering her to do so was never allowed as an argument. The entire proceeding was premised on the notion that of course the mother would receive sole custody (which she already had seized and held illegally for two years) and no civil attorney would even agree to take my case were I to challenge this. Fifteen years of marriage, and over a year of fathering since his planned conception, bore no weight with anyone in terms of custody determination, and I was made to apply for the job of part-time father.

Much has happened since then. I have had some good time, hard-won in the courts, with my son, who was four months old when he was taken from his home and from his father. He has had a child's-eye view of a very ugly divorce since the beginning of his life, and it is very difficult to have a sound and trusting relationship between us with the wall of hatred and accusation hanging between his parents. Now, in his early teens, we barely talk. I don't blame him, though I wish he could see things from my point of view, but I also pray he will never have to.

But a decade and a half of both our lives, and his place in my large and widespread family, have been lived in a condition created by one parent seizing a child criminally, with the law failing to act in any capacity in response, then going on to endorse and underwrite that seizure with every subsequent decision. Instead of the years of fathering this boy that I can never give back to him, years of adventures and deer hunts and road trips and talking about girls and helping him in school, we are awkward acquaintances, and I have lived as a combination of part-time long-distance dad, sometime vagrant, debtor, litigant and defendant, under-employed and aging away from a once-thriving career, but also dad and stepdad to three girls in the meantime.

Now, I'm older, wiser (I hope), better-informed and -experienced in the law, and just now I have some time on my hands and the globe at my fingertips, and I mean to do something about it, not just for me and my son but for all the fathers and sons and daughters and grandparents and relatives who languish under this intolerable and enormous injustice. Despite laws in every US state prohibiting both parental abduction and gender discrimination, the tactic of taking children from their homes and denying them their fathers without legal authority is a standard starting point for court-ordered childhoods in single-mother homes, with all the attendant personal, social and economic consequences to generations of one-parent children.

It's time we made this right. Who wants to help?

My current focus is to draft national legislation for a standardized procedure by law enforcement and courts immediately following a complaint of parental abduction or wrongful removal, and I invite all comments, suggestions, stories and resources you may wish to share in this good fight.

(to be continued...)

Mumsnet :Promoting Hate, Bigotry and Bias..

How similar is this to the Jezebel logo ? Same sexist doctrinal mentality at work..

I did spend some time last year perusing the "Mumsnet" site and was sickened by the malice and male hate stated on that site. The automatic vitriolic responses to my comment, even though very rational and unassuming, were responded to in ways that were totally unacceptable and were a direct assault on the site's policies, but were ignored. It was akin to the same vitriol and venom expressed on the RadFem Hub, just as sick and just as obnoxious and abusive. That feminastie site is definitely due for a shakeup and it is time that those sexist, male bashing sites started applying their own policies of fairness instead of fomenting hate and ignoring the obvious male bashing diatribe those haters have always indulged in..

Mumsnet on Facebook..

Mumsnet Site..

DSC Development and Hosting
Client Story: Mumsnet

Fathers 4 Justice Stage Naked Mumsnet Protest in Marks & Spencer Oxford Street

Like Matt States "Not a good sight"..

Members of Fathers 4 Justice (F4J) staged a naked protest in the flagship London branch of Marks & Spencer at Marble Arch, Oxford Street.
Group founder Matt O'Connor was arrested during the weekend protest, which criticised the high street store for its advertising on parenting blog site Mumsnet.
Along with four other members of the group, O'Connor took off his clothes in the store to draw attention to what F4J claimed was Mumsnet's "anti-male agenda".
He claimed that the protest was just the start of a series of attacks on M&S in order to draw attention to the "naked truth" that Mumsnet "promotes gender hatred".
He told IB Times UK: "We discovered some horrific content on the Mumsnet forums, including calling men fascists and equating fathers with Ku Klux Klan members.

So it is understandable that the Fathers4Justice movement faced up to that site's sexism, hate and discrimination. In a letter addressed to the CEO of the Mumsnet site, the Fathers4Justice Campaign Manager explains precisely what those nasty members on that site get up to and needless to say it is precisely what I witnessed as well. The entire site has been overrun by male haters as this letter states..

Dear Justine,

The following is our response to your 10 point statement about Fathers4Justice and gender hatred on Mumsnet. We are disappointed that this dispute has escalated over the last week and that Mumsnet has chosen not to resolve this matter.

As soon as we were made aware of the offensive anti-male discrimination on the Mumsnet website, we brought this matter to your attention in the appropriate manner.

We asked you to remove the offending content and commit to a zero-tolerance policy on gender hatred. We also offered to write a piece for Mumsnet outlining what Fathers4Justice actually campaigns and stands for, rather than the misrepresentation of F4J often portrayed on Mumsnet as well as to highlight the fact that F4J is run by a woman.

Instead of responding in a respectful and professional manner, you made flippant and derisory comments about me (a mother of two), failed to respond to my emails and went online in an attempt to appease the very people who had written this content by making derogatory remarks about our campaign.

Further, you have unhelpfully and deliberately set out to misrepresent the facts in this case, casting Fathers4Justice as the villains, and Mumsnet as helpless victims, disingenuously claiming no knowledge of the offence committed. A case of gender stereotyping if ever there was one.

This is not the mature response we had hoped for from a respected CEO. It should hardly be a surprise then that given your antagonistic and belligerent response, the situation has escalated. Not because we wanted to engage in an online conflict with Mumsnet, but simply because you would not remove much of the content we complained of nor make a commitment to a policy of zero-tolerance on gender hatred.

This is a situation which could and should have

...

If you butter your bread on both sides your hands get messy. You can not eat your cake today and have the same cake tomorrow: you can not have it both ways. Equal or special, you can not have it both ways. Pink for this and pink for that but we want everyone to be equal: you can not have it both ways. Build a family or fuck around: you can not have it both ways. Tell the truth or spread an appearance you can not have it both ways. Girls want to run around professing their pride in being a slut, yet complain when others use their own words: you can not have it both ways. It is time for us all to grow up, attain some maturity. You can not promote Fatherhood by attacking DADS. You can not promote children by excluding Fathers: you can not have it both ways.
From the OED
Slut
n. a slovenly or promiscuous woman
Promiscuous
adj.
1 having or characterized by many transient sexual relationships: she’s a wild, promiscuous, good time girl I promiscuous behavior
2 demonstrating or implying an unselective approach; indiscriminate or casual
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SlutWalk
http://www.slutwalktoronto.com/
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=...lk&FORM=VQFRAT
http://slutwalknyc.com/
http://www.slutwalkchicago.org/
http://www.facebook.com/SlutWalk
http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/130720908.html
http://www.slutwalkminneapolis.org/
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/m...5iDybwYXL0awvJ
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_851725.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42927752...ave-slutwalks/

Rideau Canal Museum and Wood Mill at night, Smith Falls, Ontario..

Link..
With the ever increasing amount of people wanting to be counted and be involved in fighting the good fight against the feminasties, their lying ways and total dishonesty, we have another new brother in arms, who is patiently going where some fear to tread..

Over the years we have witnessed the procedures that feminists follow and the methodology they use to spread their poison. It would appear that no one is safe from that, not even smaller cities and towns, all which are open slather. Any place regardless of size will eventually bare the brunt of those messengers of hate and evil. If we can reduce their hate message and interference, then we have at least achieved something and it does all help..

Here is one such site and it relates to Smiths Falls, Ontario, Canada. Not that far from the border of the US.

I would like you to have a look at his site, support it by becoming a follower or leave a comment and lets see if we can help him fight the scourge that he has been fighting as well as we all have, for years..

I have been under attack by the local radicals for a while, the more join the more i can scare them.

More information..

EMC Smiths falls, objectivity out the door, promoters of feminist untruths, radicalism and parental alienation.

This is a local post, for Lanark county and Smiths falls Ontario. In response to the Smiths falls EMC's refusal to publish the truth.
I have daughters and a grand daughter, by no means is this about women, it is about the destructive ideals of radical feminism and their effort to destroy the family.
-The family must be destroyed... Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process." -- Linda Gordon
-We can't destroy the inequities between men and women until we destroy marriage." Robin Morgan
-Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage." -- Sheila Cronin, the leader of the feminist organization NOW
-Every woman's son is her potential betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman." -- Andrea Dworkin

What families experience at the hand of the local woman's shelter and social programs under it's anti parent directors and the staff in the Lanark county area, is destroying the very fabric of family life, therefore the nation itself. I believe that exposing the untruth been spewed out by these people need to be told. I will not go after all shelters because it would not be right, this blog supports the original ideas of the woman's shelter promoted by Erin Pizzey.(Pizzey said that militant feminists hijacked her cause and used it to try to demonise all men, not only in Britain, but internationally).
I can only speak about local experiences and provide undeniable proof that the propaganda been imposed on the local population is nothing other than a response to this blog.
After been told that this blog is been closely scrutinized by the shelters directors, "some" of her supporters in the police, I am glad they read it and do not like what is been written. And nothing makes me happier. The truth hurts.

The local paper the Emc smiths falls, has been a propaganda tool for the local radical left wing feminist for a long time, refusing to publish local horror stories coming out of the social programs. The shelter, the local school, (St John in Perth), with Ontario works, open doors, connections, family services and all others have been increasing their funding by going after teens, specifically teen girls. We have a saying in Smiths falls, "in the spring go downtown and see how many children are pushing strollers". Welfare on demand seems to be the local governments idea of economic recovery, in turn, teen drug abuse, crime, are a big problem and downtown businesses are becoming an extinct thing of the past. There was a study performed by local officials about this problem and when parents tried to get involved they were turned away, so much for their study. Those responsible for the problem, are in charge of studying the problem, makes sense doesn't it?

http://www.bing.com/videos/watch/vid...hp&form=msnrll

To start that is a horrible story and it is sad the mom was suspected all those years...

Now to the beef. If this was a father who was suspected he would have been jailed for one. His case might have not been reopened, and he would of lost his other son. This woman had to deal with the stigma of being a murderer...

something 1000's of men have to deal with because they were falsely accused for murder and rape!

One other note, this would have not made the news if this was a father and not a mother.