Bits and pieces of campaigns, events, studies et al
Economics ~ the science of scarcity: perhaps in laymen’s terms we might say “the science of choosing between need and want” although that really does not address the issue of finite resources.
It seems for a very long time men, males and boys have been taught first to accept Child Support payments from their income, second to equate Fatherhood with Child Support (payments) and third, never to say in public anything disparaging about paying child support.
Reciprocally, mothers, women and girls are taught to expect to be entitled to their children’s fathers paychecks, and, most probably payments from society and governments. The entitlement to the father’s income can easily be correlated to the first Power and Control Wheel postulated by Duluth who asserted that a man controlling his own income was in fact abuse of the female in a male/female relationship.
Political Science is the study of how man collectively decides how a group governs itself, for instance shall each member of an agrarian group contribute a percentage of the season’s harvest to a group pool of resources. MSW’s have a Master s Degree in Social Science which should inquire into our mental and emotional health an ally of Psychiatry and Psychology. In the 1970’s and 1980’s as MSW emerged, rather than emotional and mental health the field seemed to focus upon social engineering or the imposition of values upon societies (very akin to religion).
In our new millennium a new breed of MSW’s seem actually to be focusing on mental and emotional health most probably propelled by our advance knowledge of the brain as discovered by Research Ph.Ds. from the fields of Psychology, Psychiatry and Medicine.
Still though we live under the urban myth that Child Support is simply necessary, must be done, should not be examined, and, should not be discussed by men: a perfect formula for the financing of a matriarchy.
In 2011, after fifty years of socially engineered experimentation into societies and individuals roles therein (or the lack thereof) Europe and North America as well as parts of Asia are very seriously examining public policy within the context of collective debt. The developed world has been living a champagne lifestyle on a beer budget.
Men can not discuss child support, brothers can not differentiate between those who choose Fatherhood and those who neglect it and as a consequence we all pay until there are no more savings (capital) to build upon.
As education Unions demand more, no one discusses the concept of: fifty years ago a child’s household paid for public education, now both (two or more) households financially support public education. In America many, many children have two bedrooms (one at Dad’s and one at Mom’s) while others have none. This duplication of assets and cost has a very interesting position within the concept of champagne lifestyles on a beer budget: and, we are afraid to discuss it.
I am unsure whether members of the American Association of University Women prefer strawberries with their champagne I do know they promoted Gurlz rule boys drool and denounced the empirical evidence demonstrating a boyz crisis in education. Solid researchers are pushing reality (Boyz Crisis) back into the collective discussion, it would seem government and industry is as well with complaints about inadequate training.
It is not unreasonable to examine child care cost, child rearing cost, child education cost and their related efficiencies that is a part of economics: how much utility for how much spent (or in laymen’s terms for instance, a comparison of fuel mileage).
Just before the turn of the twenty-first century a true Economist (with his very own Ph.D.) published on the concept of Child Support: R. Mark Rogers Ph.D. We have been told to abandon the stealthy stalking of the gatherer-hunter. We have been told that boys and girls are not different. We have been told to accept social engineering for our own good. With the new generation of MSWs, who with the research Ph.Ds. of Psychiatry, Psychology and Medicine, are examining most efficient self fulfillment – how we can each be the best me, we can be, and, with entire continents financially seeming about to implode, it is time to man up and examine where our money is going.
Research studies and reports are being added (yes, one has to read them to know what they say) to assist the discussion. Please find the peer reviewed empirical evidence (science) under Essential or Research. The author, nor anyone else, can understand the studies for you: sorry, but would you REALLY want it any other way?
The new feminism (second wave [the radicals]) who have to be a part of everything male while acting in a misandric fashion are creating a sadistic Matriarchy across the globe. If Men and women split everything 50/50 and women get 50% of the man’s 50 and 7/8ths of the remaining twenty five percent as special entitlements that equals 97.25% - maybe that is why females make the majority of retail purchases.
I can envision men reading this crossing their legs, wringing their hands uncomfortably, almost whining: I hope they read the rest of this, check out the links, STOP, breathe and then reflect: the truth is in the studies. We have for decades lazily subscribed to urban myth even though lies have been proven and dispelled: Warshak
Apparently the Jewish community is concerned with a dwindling male membership The end of Jewish Men are not the Protestant and Catholic Communities facing the same situation?
Not all single mothers are sadistic but images of Britney, Lindsey and Casey should wake us up a little simply look up female violence on You Tube . “‘Oh say it is not true” exclaim the gentlemen twisting in their seats, perhaps, but this material is not made up Bringing Attention to Abuse By Females it is true; Google has tried to censor such material as hate speech preferring homosexual friendly comments (sorry their editorial preference and a true statement simply ask bloggers).
All mothers probably are not that violent despite the ones we have seen grabbing their children by the arm in the grocery store, we do know (even if we are afraid to discuss it) at least some moms utilize the electronic babysitter, we have been talking about it for decades, but could it lead to this: Should parents of obese kids lose custody?
We know Fathers petition Courts for custody, joint custody, shared custody, parenting time, access to their children everyday, and, everyday leave the Court Room broken hearted despite the evidence demonstrating the criticality of fathers to their children’s development, ForumWisdom LibraryFacts and FiguresEssential There are only about one hundred and six entries thereYou could also try Research there are only thirty-eight hyper-linked references there.
The Public Broadcast System actually airs programming that touches upon religion, last weekend I listened to a Catholic Bishop lamenting the injury upon all of those poor families that the current budget debacle will cause. I am certain the Bishop truly had in mind social injustice to less fortunate people _ I truly believe the Bishop had no conception at all he really is lamenting a minor loss in funding for the enabling of single mother homes whilst depriving children of their fathers.
There is no logic in promoting Fatherhood whilst denigrating Fathers. There is no logic in promoting a social system that separates children from their fathers whilst costing America three hundred thirty-six billion dollars annually Sex, money…and national bankruptcies.
Perhaps no one really cares enough to have read this far, or someone is yawning, or instead of twisting in their seat someone has urinated, can we seriously imagine grown adults so afraid of women, there are afraid to read this?
Mothers are sacred, mothers are scary, what am I thinking, well I am not the happiest camper in the entire world but I am not alone; Mother’s Day 2011: not so Purdy – Americas’s PBS documentary, Mother, mother, where are you? , Another Broken Heart truth to tell this is but a minor glimpse of the anecdotal evidence.
As the men continue to cringe I can imagine someone uttering a derogatory remark. Do we even know how to educate males STOP, please do not be so sure about yourself, have you read anything found here: Michael Gurian , any of these Books for Fathers ?
Do we really know what we are advocating for: In the matter of: pornography v, romantic fantasies , Parental Alienation, In our good do we do bad
Long letter, nothing is simple, our children deserve their Fathers, our Boys deserve to be treated for who they are, our Congregations, Synagogues and Parishes deserve participation from both sexes.
Updated 24th-July-2011 at 11:32 AM by BobV01
The left-leaning United Church of Christ now wants to be even more politically correct, and to do so its deliberative body has replaced the reference to “Heavenly Father” with the gender neutral term, “triune God,” in the denomination’s constitution.
Regardless that "Heavenly Father" was the term used by Christ Himself to describe God... and this church is of Christ...
Full story is here.
Pastors work to preach beyond the choir, I wonder sometimes if Fathers reach out beyond the choir as well: the choir already knowing the verses to the song.
The Church (as a group) reach out in their benevolence helping their Brothers and sisters, especially poor families (such as single mother homes with undisclosed income). The Church seems also to be a protector of everyone's rights, again especially the rights of downtrodden women.
If we do not educate our church going Brothers and Pastors, most probably they truly, think that they are indeed doing good. Fathers have a job to do in spreading the word, even in Churches. I wonder if the good Pastors truly see this as Godly behavior:
Hot Girls in Bikinis: Hot Girls Wearing Flag Bikinis - KIAH
10 year old gives birth
10 Year Old Gives Birth and Her Mother Is Delighted - KIAH
…and national bankruptcies
This is a discussion about three hundred and thirty-six billion dollars, money we do not have and money we can save, this is going to take longer than fifteen seconds probably even longer than five minutes, please use the links and review the material: an informed discussion is the best one.
Males and females have disagreements and males and females both say “it is my way or the highway”, in relationships involving children though, most Fathers hear “I’m hitting the highway and I’m taking the kids”. State, local and the federal government are right there to join the argument in saying “the kids go with mom”.
Various political interests present “power and control” in a variety of ways:
Duluth presents power and control over females here:
West Michigan DAD presents power and control over males here:
SAVE Services gender neutral power and control can be found here:
Perhaps we need to enter relationships in a truthful manner without expectation of changing one another, and, expecting to honestly know one another.
“President Obama grew up without his dad, and has said that being a father is the most important job he has. Fatherlessness is a growing crisis in America, one that undergirds many of the challenges that families are facing. When dads aren't around, young people are more likely to drop out of school, use drugs, be involved in the criminal justice system, and become young parents themselves.”
We can not promote Fatherhood by denigrating Fathers. We can not promote Fatherhood by incentivizing single motherhood. We can not solve all of our neighbor’s arguments.
Every one it seems links mothers to children to victimhood. It might be more appropriate to link children to their fathers. Not all women are named Britney or Lindsey or Casey. Are all women sluts http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-13333013, are all women violent and abusive http://antimisandry.com/abuse-dv/? These women think not: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InCbA...layer_embedded, and, http://phyllisschlafly.com/.
Are boys and girls the same? Some say no: http://www.michaelgurian.com/ or http://www.michaelgurian.com/boys_an..._teachers.html.
How productive can a man be after divorce and losing his children: http://www.saveservices.org/download...e-Abuse-System
What might the costs of faithlessness be? One hundred billion dollars annually http://westmichigandad.files.wordpre...dollar-man.pdf
Maybe another billion http://www.saveservices.org/?s=half+billion
Perhaps we could add another three hundred and ten million dollars: http://www.saveservices.org/download...estic-Violence
Are Fathers necessary http://westmichigandad.wordpress.com...-and-children/ lists several studies demonstrating the criticality of fathers to their children'’ development (the studies are available for download).
Could the figure be about three hundred thirty-six billion dollars?
USofA Federal Budget (FY2010)
Costs of Fatherlessness
Minority Business Development
Guests, members we have been traveling for decades to this point. Please write a letter to President Obama, your Congressman your Senators, your state and local elected people.
Ask your friends to do so. We can not promote fatherhood by denigrating fathers. We can not promote fatherhood by incentivizing single motherhood.
Savings is gone, child obesity is now a problem. The electronic baby-sitter is dragging children’s learning down.
Contact President Obama here: Contact the White House | The White House
You might copy and paste the following:
Mr. President I can not accomplish this in 2,500 characters. I will add hyperlinks to reasonable documents.
We can not promote Fatherhood by denigrating Fathers. We can not promote Fatherhood by incentivizing single motherhood. We can not raise test scores, personal savings or diminish childhood obesity by incentivizing single motherhood.
-Mandatory DNA testing at child birth.
-reduce SSA funding for single mothers
-reduce VAWA funding
antimisandry.com - Articles
Dads of Michigan
Boys and Girls Learn Differently!: A Guide for Teachers and Parents
view the letter here Can we leave the world a little bit better - how we do it... - Blogs - antimisandry.com
or this post: http://antimisandry.com/campaigns-ne...8-a-16028.html
Or this one: http://antimisandry.com/facts-figure...tml#post217804
Or this one: http://antimisandry.com/discriminati...ism-31669.html
Childhood obesity: Should parents of obese kids lose custody? | West Michigan DADSUnited States Senators
U.S. Senate: Senators Home
United States House of Representatives
Directory of Representatives · House.gov
Like it, reddit it cross post, write letters to the editor or to television programs THIS IS THE TIME TO BE HEARD. For our future, for our children, for our economic future let Fathers be Dads, LET US BE HEARD