Hey folks,

Now, I can guess what some of you are going to say - Oh no, not again!

Hold on, hold on. Hear me out.

Yeah, I've buggered up the old blogs (well, actually - I personally didn't, but nonetheless there are issues that I cannot resolve). Whereas, I've always managed to salvage the forum data. This blog software - rather crude & lacking aesthetics as it is, is actually tied to the forum directly. Thus, I have a lot more control over it.

It is also tied to your account on the forum, which the former blogs were not. So hopefully, you can see some benefits from it. I'll attempt at some point to pull some of the data from the old to this one.

Who’s your Euro MP? What’s his name? don’t know? Nor do I. Yet he is the one who represents you more than your own MP in fact your MP is quite redundant these days. Indeed it is my understanding that parliament will cease to be on 5th May 2010.

What happens? the EuroNazi’s make a directive saying for example “Men should be castrated after the age of 60”. This directive is then distributed to member countries, who have by law to instigate it. The government then pass it on to the police and the courts etc. Such Directives are made by civil servants as explained below.

A directive is a legislative act of the European Union which requires member states to achieve a particular result without dictating the means of achieving that result. It can be distinguished from European Union regulations which are self-executing and do not require any implementing measures. Directives normally leave member states with a certain amount of leeway as to the exact rules to be adopted. Directives can be adopted by means of a variety of legislative procedures depending on its subject matter.

The day finally comes when an appointment has been sent to you, for your castration. You rush round your MP’s house and bitterly complain, he may sympathize with you but there’s nothing he can do, he suggests you try your Euro MP. He tells you he has brought this problem up several times in the EuroNazi parliament, without any luck in getting it repealed. This has occured with the "police" the "courts" "Social Services"and on and on.

So when you go to the divorce court it is not the British court under British law. It is a British court under Europe Law. You could spend the next 100 years fighting the British Courts, while letting EuroNasi’s off the hook. Wake up for god sake.
Directive’s have been coming from Europe for several years now. When this latest deal is done and dusted the British are in for one hell of a surprise.

The press say we’ve sleepwalked into this mess, I don’t think people have sleepwalked into this mess I believe it is just plain British stupidity.

The Magna Carta ("Great Charter of Freedoms") signed in 1215 for our freedom, the Magna Carta influenced the development of the common law and many constitutional documents. Hang on! This was written, about 900 years ago? So are you saying these Barons, Bishops and Abbots were more fair mind, honest, just and ready to defend the common man. Yes they were.

The Magna Carta states, that no fine shall be imposed on an accused until the man has been before a court, or words to that effect. This an extremely important law for the common man.

Now if the stupid British (80% sheeple’s) had not let this law be suppressed by this Government and then finally superseded by the EuroNazi law we would have a much fairer deal for the motorist of today.

No speeding tickets or parking ticket’s until a court hearing is had, what’s that 3-4 million court orders a day, the system would collapse and the cameras taken down, and the law repealed, hmm I smell roses of freedom.

Why can feminists find time to tear down safe house for men, but can't find time to help men?

Remember, chances are - as this is being asked by an anti-feminist, it will be deleted shortly.

Tracey, from Yahoo Answers (Gender & Women's studies section) seems to have a mild obsession with this site.



This was written in response to a question by a member of Y!A known as 'Joe Schmoe' who asked for respondants to come up with the 'funniest answer' to this news article:

Sadly, but typically, Tracey is relying on misinformation and anticipating people won't check up for themselves. That is how feminism has been able to spread so much misandry in the past, by making untruthful claims safe in the knowledge that most folks won't actually check out the facts and just gobble up all they're fed by the pork-machine.

Here is what I suspect Tracey is referring to. It's an answer from another question (How many rape cases are false....?) pertaining to 'rape', in which I (as representative of AntiMisandry.com) gave one answer, which reads:

(click images for links to question & answers)



And here's the answer where 95% statistic was made. So, a bit of misrepresentation goes a long way in feminist mentality.

How long before YA Nazi's delete this one, ya reckon?

First of all, find the LINKS icon in the main navigation menu at the top of every page.




Once you've done this, find the most pertinent section for the link you would like, in this example we will use 'good books', found under "BOOKS" and then "GOOD"



Now click "SUBMIT LINK".



And then copy (CTRL+C) the URL of the book's web address where it can be purchased. In this example, it can be purchased from Amazon bookstore.



Now paste (CTRL+V) the book's URL address into the "URL" input field/box, ensure the Category is correct (e.g. Books/Good) and then click "SUBMIT"



Finally, where it asks for the 'name of the web site...' enter the books TITLE, to help make it easier for people who are looking for it (and search engines, helping the rankings of book increase when named correctly). Add some information in the DESCRIPTION field to help explain briefly about the book, the author and so on. If possible, you can include standard forum codes to place images using the [img]http://image-address.com/file/name.jpg[/img]
Finish this entry by clicking SUBMIT.




The end result of this particular entry can be located here and don't forget, the links CAN be discussed DIRECTLY within the link, no need to start a seperate thread each time. Just click the standard 'post reply' found at the bottom of every link.

Because AM was off-line I spent a little time over in GWS yesterday. I just wanted to show you something. This answer got 12 thumbs up (2 down). Question was posted by Rio : "Do you wear a label of any kind?" (Talking about feminism): My answer: Rio ,

I gave this answer to another question but feel it applies here as well:

I've been doing some serious researching about men's issues, and the reasons behind the emergence of the MRA movement. It hasn't been easy. Came up against a lot of very angry people. And like the feminism movement, there are a few bad apples in the bunch. It took a lot for me to ignore those bad apples (because instinctively I all I wanted to do was defend against their offensiveness.) But thankfully there were many who had the patience to show me what the underlying issues of the men's movement really are. I credit my psychology professor, as well, for giving me a balanced, scholarly approach to these issues. I'm beginning to see just how ignored men's issues really are in today's society. Do I blame feminism? No. But I think it's going to take women AND men understanding the issues (gaining awareness), and uniting with each other to effect changes.

The problem with modern feminism is that it's interests lie only with women, and unfortunately, that leaves about half of the population out in the cold. These aren't the days where we can't vote, can't go to school, can't get access to birth control, can't get jobs. (At least not here in the US ). In this country, feminism has accomplished great things for women. And I for one am grateful to the people that came before me that fought so hard for these rights that we all enjoy. Feminism, however, is not without it's flaws. The biggest flaw being that men have rights, issues, and concerns that need attention, and there's no one out there who's hearing the call. Is this altogether feminism's fault? No. But one cannot deny that the interests of boys and men are not feminists' domain. Until we unite the sexes and fight together for HUMAN rights, there will continue to be conflict about feminism today and into the future. In my psychology and sociology classes I am finding out that white males are new targets of prejudice in the media. Why? Because it's not politically correct to target women or minorities. What's left? Boys are lagging behind now in school. We've worked so hard to give girls a better education and should be proud of our success. But what about the fact that boys are dropping out at record rates, using drugs, going to jail, committing suicide? And what about affirmative action quotas which are taking jobs away from qualified males and causing reverse discrimination, increasing prejudice against women? Feminism isn't flawless. We've achieved much in this century, particularly here in the US . I think it's time to shift the focus to other areas that need it. Is it right that men get heavier jail sentences than women for crimes like murder? Is it right that society views men as dispensable when it comes to child custody hearings? Is it right that men get penalized for being breadwinners (being away from home supporting their families) when it comes to figuring out who gets custody of the kids? Is it right that the courts almost always side with mothers regardless of the situation?
Is it right that people who make false rape allegations are not held accountable in most cases? Is it right that almost zero resources are available to men who are victims of domestic violence? Is it right that there's a harmful myth in our society that men can't be as good at nurturing children as mothers can be? Is it right that men who apply for teaching positions in early childhood education or daycare provider positions are looked at with suspicion and are often not hired? Is it right that more funding goes to women's medical issues (like breast cancer) when men are dying in large numbers from prostate cancer?

Should we continue to ignore the concerns of men?

What we see in this forum are angry men, yes. Some sad men too. And some women who see that feminism in and of itself is not protecting or promoting equal rights for all. If it were, we'd be fighting just as hard for the rights of men and boys as we are for girls and women.

If I'm going to take a label, I'm going to take two labels: feminist and masculist. Never again am I going to see the world through only one perspective. We're all in this together. Human rights are important to me. It's taken me awhile to realize that men have issues, too. And they are no less important than women's issues. So either I will embrace both labels, or no label at all. I can honestly say I am truly an equalist.

• 13 hours ago

• 12 Rating: Good Answer
• 2 Rating: Bad Answer
• Report It

By Denise Noe

Think of a bum and what comes to mind? Someone in ragged clothes, shuffling around. Someone who doesn’t work and probably for reasons that are blameworthy. Think of a wino and a similar image comes to mind only with a bottle these time and perhaps reeling around.

In both cases, the image these pejorative terms conjure up is inevitably male.

Sometime in the 1970s and 1980s, the bums and winos of our society became known as “the homeless.” Why? Warren Farrell in The Myth of Male Power pointed out the probable reason: because they were joined by an appreciable number of women when the mental hospitals went through “de-institutionalization.”

Interestingly, female homeless are called “bag ladies.” The last word of the two-part term seems like an attempt to soften it by giving them the status of “ladies.” The first part of the term refers to the places where these homeless keep their belonging s. Taken as a whole, “bag lady” has none of the disgust attached to the words traditionally associated with men who sink to the economic bottom.

Even with the growth of female homeless, 85% of those in this category are men. If those figures were reversed and the majority of those sleeping on the streets or on park benches were women, would society as a whole be more determined to address this problem?

This past 2 weeks.

The most interesting and somewhat morbid, thing that's happend in my life recently is this: A work friend of mine stabbed his ex-girlfriend in the face after laying in wait outside her home. (You guessed it, a trailer park; no offense August!)

They were together for about 2 yrs until 3 weeks ago, he came home and all of her shit was gone. No phone call or warning, though they had more than their fare share of arguments and probably should have broken up in the interest of a blow up like this happening. He spent the next 2 weeks trying everything he could to win her back: flowers, gifts, pages and pages of love letters. All of which she accepted, but she still would not respond to anything he said to her. (We all work in the same building on the same shift!)

He lost his apartment because she did not pay her half of the rent, even though she left days before it was due. His baby-mama was conspiring with his mother to keep his 3 yr old daughter out of his custody.(His baby mama is neglectful to the point of abuse, his mother is just a bird of a feather that flocks to a fellow vagina.)

Does this excuse his horrific actions? No. In the end we are all responsible for ourselves. But before this happened, he reached out to me. Told me what he was feeling. And at the time I just didn't have the emotional energy to help ease his burden by lifting a bit of it on myself. What if I had only been there for him? Would things be different?

She is going to have permanent facial scars, and little to no use of her fingers (defensive wounds). He is pleading guilty to all charges against him and will probably do 5-10 yrs in state prison. His daugter will end up in state custody soon if the mother doesn't step up.

Right now I'm just trying not to be one of the friends who completly cut ties with him after this. He's going to pay a hefty debt to society, and knowing what goes on in prison, I believe that is punishment enough.

I still don't think he's really a bad person, I think he's a stand up guy who snapped under pressure. And hopefully he gets another chance when he's out.

SOON: A post on the single man's sickening slavery to pussy.

How often have we heard: “this is not right”, “this violates my constitutional rights”, “if a man did this”…?
…we are all aware, I would suppose, that Father’s and children (posterity) have had their constitutional liberties abridged throughout the past forty years: I would further assert that there are more than a few of us who can cite what we believe to be the rights violated.

On January 16, 1788 James Madison wrote, in part:
“…we may define a republic to be, or at least may bestow that name on, a government which derives all its powers directly or indirectly from the great body of the people…”
[The Federalist No. 39: MADISON signed Publius]
On November 10, 1787 John Jay wrote, in part:
“…nothing would tend more to secure us from them (dangers from abroad) than Union, strength, and good Government within ourselves. This subject is copious and cannot easily be exhausted. ..”
[The Federalist No. 5: JAY signed Publius]

I assert that all of our Founding Fathers writing as Publius were expressing the concept of self governance, we, the Great Body of People, elect from our midst those who will assemble together to determine our public policy and administration.

Before seeking a redress of our grievances first in a Court of Law, may I humbly commend upon each of us: the thought that: it is each of us and us collectively who will choose, from our midst, those we wish to determine our public policy and administration.

As a single non custodial father of two awesome young sons aged twenty-four and eight years of age, the choices seem abundantly clear to me. A quick reiteration of some points might somehow clarify my positions to the reader.

Those who espouse a belief in Father’s and Children’s Rights should be familiar with Social Security Act Title IV-D, if we took time to read the Act we might even find Title IV-E and others all of which are non-retirement income expenditures: although understanding the various SSA Titles to produce the funding for misandristic incentives, have we realized that non retirement income expenditures diminish the promise the Social Security Trust offered before 1964, and then, understand why there may be those who wish to allow individuals to privately invest those savings to keep the saved money out of an un-trusted general account? We have all read the peer reviewed empirical evidence demonstrating the criticality of Fathers to their Children’s Development [or find the studies in the files section here: West Michigan DADS]

We have read about Joe Biden’s authorship of VAWA, we have participated in the calls for VAWA to address all domestic violence, we wrote to Hillary while John Murtari was incarcerated, we have read R.A.D.A.R.’s [http://www.mediaradar.org/] reports.
Some of us at least have read Obama’s Responsible Fatherhood Act that after three paragraphs of father involvement banalities paraphrased from the National Fatherhood Initiative [http://www.fatherhood.org/] and then reiterates child support sixty-five times.

We have ignored President Bushes Responsible Fatherhood Initiatives of 2005 which include Father access and involvement [http://fatherhood.hhs.gov/] et al and which directed the States in receipt of certain funds to become more Father Friendly We ignored the Federal Legislature passing on to Custodial Parents the “Child Support Collection Surcharge Fee” in the summer of 2008, announced by Republican Congressman Vern Ehlers and others. We should all be aware of Santorum’s efforts, we know of Hoogendyk’s, Steil’s, Green’s, Jansen’s, Sheen’s et al efforts to support Fathers, Families Children and Marriage. McCain has adopted the position of Father’s Rights is a State issue the same position he takes on abortion. We have some certainty that McCain prefers a reduction of non retirement income expenditures from the Social Security portion of the General Fund. We know that the Federal Department of Justice holds that Duluth is not an appropriate therapy for Domestic Violence. No, McCain has not taken a flashy position on Father’s Rights, or Children’s Rights or Family Rights.

We could simply ask which candidates are most likely to advance our position in public policy: Republicans, as individuals and as a party have demonstrated a solid track record on that. We could read McCain Is Right On Father’s Rights But Does He Know It? – Roger F. Gray [http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/08/27/mccain-is-right-on-fathers-rights-but-does-he-know-it/]

We could note that not all women are the same, and, certainly that NOW does not stand for all American women: NOW President Kim Gandy attacked Sarah Palin as soon as her Vice Presidential Candidacy was announced. Most telling is Gandy’s recitation of Obama and Biden’s misandry in the NOW endorsement of their candidacy [Gandy's comments in NOW...