Recent Blogs Posts

That last part is a major disclaimer. I hear a lot of people say that “equality among the sexes is impossible”. I disagree. Things will never be 100% perfect. I get that. But shouldn’t we atleast try to get as goddam close as we possibly can? Im a cynic, but even I see that we can improve things.

So here are some of the arguments that people have made against equality, which I argue aren’t really about equality. Lets look at some major blogs

From Angry Harry’s Blog

“For those who think, Yes, (because there are more women voters than men voters) then it follows that they also believe that those in a minority should have less of a say in what affects them.
They believe that the largest group (women) should have the greatest power.”

This isn’t true, you are saying one group should have more power, rather that each individual should have have equal amount of voting power. Women do not vote as a completely unified group. They may think similarly, but there is no female hive-mind being somewhere telling them all to think and vote the exact same way.

For example, if men and women are doing the same job for the same number of hours, then a superficial analysis would suggest that they should get paid the same amount.
But, should they?
For example, should a man who has been lawyering or bricklaying for 20 years be paid the same as a woman who has been doing such jobs for only 10 years?
Should a man who can carry two bricks in his wheelbarrow earn the same pay as a woman who can only carry one?
If you answer Yes to either of the above questions, then I would argue that your notion of 'equality' is very strange.

Actually its not, this goes back to the topic of equality for all practical purposes. They are equal. They are treated equally based on relative factors of skill and pay. Equal treatment does not necessarily mean equal outcome. Paying people the same regardless of work done and/or hours put forth (based on the business’s decision) would be equal, but it certainly wouldn’t be fair.

However if you put forth more work, negotiate a better wage, etc. It certainly is equal treatment to get more. This is because you took the chances and did more work. They had the opportunity to do so, and didn’t. That is their loss. Generally speaking the person who worked twice as many years would be paid more and that would be equal.You have to add in the reality factor.

more here

Feminism has a love-hate relationship with globalization and multiculturalism. As ive pointed out they use it for the blame of the male identity crisis. Multiculturalism has been a great eye opener for business, technology and social norms. Social norms are great in many ways, especially regarding some of the more lassaiz-faire philosophies became more mainstream, and ethical approaches to things have been analyzed as well. There is no one perfect road and as they get blended together we take many aspects of cultures (from food and style to government policies and business)

Then we get to the horrible things. Men taken away due to apartheid in south africa and women being raped and tormented in Islamic cultures. As a result an entire religion is being condemned based on being hostile towards women. Of course we ignore that men are murdered while women are raped when you live to tell the tale you get a lot more attention and concern

more here...

For those of you who havent heard of it, Idump4u.com is a website where you can pay a guy 10 dollars and you can have someone dump your girlfriend/boyfriend. Its sleazy, I know. However they also put alot of the audio recordings on youtube . If you like laughing at others pain or horrific situations then this is for you. Normally you get the clingy people, those bad in bed, or just strange people-and fun is had by all (listening) however this recently came up.

Yes, Dennis was in an abusive relationship, had a glass thrown at him and his head cut for ruining the season finale of dexter.

Bradley makes a huge deal out of the abuse, and tries to pound it through the bitch's head that its a problem. Clearly he gets it as a cause of breakup, but i dont think the average listener will start thinking about the impact of male victims of domestic violence.

Of course, thats not why I am pointing this out, I say this because it can be used as a tool in order to avoid an abusive partner.

More here...

Feminists have claimed the male identity has been lost not due to feminism but due to the fact jobs are being shipped overseas and low skill jobs were gone leaving men without a place. This is tactic number one for the male identity being lost without blaming feminism.

Now as I have already pointed out, according to feminism the male identity crisis is caused by globalization but the change of gender roles (the positive aspects that come with it) are due to feminism. So essentially what they are doing is trying to change the topic, using globalization as a scapegoat while feminism remains the cure. Anyone buying that? Im not

But lets look at things deeper, maybe they are onto something, has globalization changed the male identity?

More here...

We have all heard the sex/gender debate. So let me clarify this now, when I say gender I also mean sex. So this is regarding men seeing themselves as a separate entity from women or the social norm. When I say gender, I mean men as a group.
The reason I am asking this is because it seems a lot of men don’t look into men’s rights. They may question things, when told to open doors for women, or register for the draft. But few go to a great extent beyond that

Theres often mocking or criticizing of the idea of “white culture” because, in America white is the social and cultural norm. So there is little to no analysis in regards to how people are discriminated against regarding being white (even though in 2000 they were the fourth largest group of victims of hate crimes after blacks, jews, and gays-collectively). “Men’s issues” might be seen similar to most along the idea “white culture”. They live it as a social norm, so they don’t really think about it that much. If you look at the male gender as what we consider the cultural norm, for better or for worse it makes sense why most men wouldn’t question what men have to go through.

If men do not see themselves as a group, it is clearly problematic. They put less concern on prostate cancer, suicide, social conscription, etc. Because men are individuals and independent by nature, they do not see men as a gender.

So men don’t see men as a gender. As the cultural norm they do not look past things regarding the way they are, they do not see the big picture because they do not really question things to the extent that they should be questioned.

More here...

No one likes the use of a draft in the military, its more efficient when you have only people that want to be there. However it happens when someone wants to start conquering the world around them (Persian Empire immortal’s were chosen at birth, Napoleon used conscription) or when we are in a war we should or shouldn’t be in and we are short infantry (Vietnam, The Civil War)

However what the draft does to those who don’t get selected is puts them in a state of fear and anxiety. If you read my interview with Paul Nathanson he talked about it as well. Men would do anything they could to distract themselves in order to keep their mind off of the fact they could be pulled out of school to become potential cannon fodder.

Yes, signing up might not be a big deal to the average guy nowadays (it does make you question things but it isn’t as much a threat now, that soon may change) however during wartime it gives every man a mass anxiety attack, its not too hard to see groups of kids freakin out on a daily basis because of this

Anyone ever read the story “the lottery”, you’ve probably heard of it, the classic where they have the lottery and the “winner” dies. Its sort of like that, only the winner is put into a deadly situation.

And why do we do this? To protect the women!!!!

more here...

ok thats a bit of a stretch but im in a publicity mode and starting to put my links on the mens rights reddit id appreciate it if you guys would give it a "thumbs up" (or whatever its called ive been following reddit for a few weeks but am just starting to get into it) whenever you guys check the site out id appreciate it

thanks

For those of you who might have been hibernating in a cave these past few weeks, Proposition 8 was overturned and now in California gays can legally marry. The argument made can be summed up simply in two major arguments

“We cannot leave who is discriminated against up to a vote”

and…

“Tradition is not a legitimate reason to uphold a definition if it discriminates”

Pretty straight forward, right? And think what you will of gay marriage, those two things are big. We cant let discrimination be put up to a vote and tradition isn’t valid for discrimination.

This means that we have essentially found and validated a way to make everyone who runs a domestic violence shelter’s mind explode and wallet crumble. We can take this and use it to our advantage. To those who are more politically active than I, and if any politicians see this-WE HAVE BEEN GIVEN A GOLDEN TICKET LETS USE IT!!!!!!!

That’s right bitches. VAWA is going down.

more here...

Sometimes shit needs to happen for things to get better, the whole two steps forward one step back idea. So does the masculinity crisis count? I am going to say probably. Radical things were done to change the role of women in society, it has led to less happiness (but worth it in my opinion) and battles with oneself for which path to take. Nothing comes without a cost. In order for the role of men to change. there needs to be a state of shock which we now have. We have acted far too late but its not too late to stick up for ourselves, let ourselves be respected in “female” careers, stay at home fathers, and most of all-not be demonized and/or expendable, we are valuable because of who we are we aren’t social cannon fodder.


more here...

Family courts routinely deprive men of their fundamental right to parent their own children by charging them with a wide variety of trivial offenses. Family courts generally uphold feminist demands to kick a man out of his own home, and take control of their children and his money, based on a woman’s unsubstantiated allegations. A major weapon in this ongoing battle between men and women who don’t get along is the Violence Against Women Act. This law was passed in 1994 as a payoff to the radical feminists for helping to elect Bill Clinton President in 1992.

The Violence Against Women Act shows the hypocrisy of noisy feminist demands that we kowtow to their ideology of gender neutrality, to their claim that there is no difference between male and female, and to their opposition to stereotyping and gender profiling. There is nothing sex neutral about this law. It is based on the proposition that there are, indeed, innate gender differences: men are naturally batterers and women are naturally victims. This law is not designed to eliminate or punish violence, but to punish only alleged violence against women. Most of the shelters financed by the Violence Against Women Act do not accept men as victims.

This law has been known from the getgo as “feminist pork” because it puts $1 Billion a year of U.S. taxpayers’ money into the hands of the radical feminists. They have set up shop in domestic violence shelters where they promote divorce, marriage breakup, hatred of men, and false accusations, while rejecting marriage counseling, reconciliation, drug-abuse treatment, and evidence of mutual-partner abuse. There is no accountability for the taxpayers’ money spent in these shelters. This law provides the woman with free legal counsel to pursue her allegations, but not the man to defend himself. He is on his own to find and pay a lawyer.


Contributing Editor, Phyllis Schlafly, is the Founder and President of Eagle Forum. Used with permission.