Dear Harry,

Sitting here on the porch, out in Canada, drinking cold beer on a
warm July night and reading your website, as I often do...getting a little
tipsy now, as I often do (Hey, I'm Canadian!).

Great Work!

I was reading your piece titled "Are You a Computer Simulation" and
was intrigued as I often contemplate such inane concepts myself!

I also read elsewhere on your blog how you found reading on the
internet to be a form of relaxation much better than the TV etc, something
which I wholeheartedly agree with and find myself doing with virtually
all of my free time now. TV is background noise for me now and I rarely
can even tell you what it is I currently have the channel tuned to...

Anyway, in regard to your article, and while I know this is somewhat
off topic, it reminded me of a website that I came across perhaps a
year ago that entirely enthralled me with its insights. I thought that if
you enjoyed reading on the web so much that your intellectual mind
might particularly enjoy spending a few days ensconsed in this mind blowing
theory as I did.

http://www.atlan.org/

I know this website concentrates on the lost continent of Atlantis,
which may to some seem frivolous, but what grabbed me the most was the
concept/connections made between all major religions and the implication
that something "bigger" is going on here!

Anyway, thought I would make you aware... If you are up for some
penetrative literature that boggles the mind, which you seem to enjoy as
much as I do!

R

(A little bit of fun, anyways. This website still sticks in my mind after a year! I want to grab onto a religious scholar and discuss the "Nephilim" described in Genisis 6! I have also concluded on my own that perhaps the "fall" of society was due to the excesses of feminist neandertals and cro-magnons! LOL!)

.............

OK, still drinking beer on the porch here...

Here is a concept that has going on in my mind for quite some time now.

What if... What if there was a society that preceded us...

What if... What if we were placed on Earth by aliens...

What if... As you claim, that humankind only has a 50% chance of surviving the next 100 years?

If our human society were to virtually be wiped out... there would be some survivors, yes or no? SOME would survive! Even if they were people who lived in biologically contained "shelters?" There are these people out there!

So... technology would be destroyed, morals would be destroyed etc etc. Eventually all knowledge of the previous existence would be destroyed, for how would we document such existence without elecricity and knowing that paper would disentegrate in the thousands of years that it would take for technology to recuperate?

What would you leave in its place? If YOU were the last person of "our" time, teaching the new generation? Think Mad Max.

I would leave religion.

Why does all religion have such similarities? Why all the fall from paradise? Why all the hope to return to it? WHY DO ALL RELIGIONS PORTRAY WOMEN AS SHOULD BE MANDATORILY SUBSERVIENT TO MEN?

If you, Angry Harry, were the last man on earth from the times of old, and had to leave instructions on how to form society... how would you dictate the societal structures between men and women, knowing what you know today about the power dynamics inherent between the genders?

..................


Hi R

Sorry for the delay, but my missus has not been well recently, and she has just had a lump removed from her breast. We are going to find out next week whether or not the cancer is likely to have spread, in which case its radiotherapy and chemotherapy for a while.

I have been scanning the internet for all sorts of information and I think that the prognosis is very good indeed - so, at the moment, I am very optimistic. And I think that it has been caught VERY early. But she is very uptight about it all at the moment.

My email address at, ....

angryharryspost@yahoo.com

... should work; or, ...

harrysnews@gmail.com

I shall definitely pop along to the Atlantis website and have a good look.

Your point about all major religions reckoning that men should dominate over their women is very interesting, and I have recently been discovering that many MRAs seem to be waking up to the same conclusion - viz; that if women are given too much power, then societal chaos seems to arise.

And while I am beginning to believe that this is most probably the case, I suspect that one of the main reasons that all these religions managed to come up with this idea - and maintain it - is because men quite approved of it! And I reckon that many women were more than happy for the men to take responsibility that went along with the power.

But you are quite right when you suggest that if I had to leave some small legacy - some 'gender' advice - for future generations of a thousand years hence, then the notion that men should be dominant over their women would, indeed, seem to be an extremely important part of that advice and, as you imply, perhaps the **most** important part!

I have never quite thought deeply enough about gender matters in this way before, but I think that you are on to something. And I even think that it might be the case that this notion - that men should be dominant over their women - could be a very attractive rallying call; with considerable power to change the society in which we live - for the better.

I am going to post this up on Karl's forum - if that's OK - and test the waters!

Thanks R - much appreciated.

Harry

Now this is something I've wondered about too. I recall when I first really started comprehending the consquences of 'feminism', one of the analogies I drew in my mind's eye was that of feminism being akin to a religious cult. A cult that allowed female dominance in virtually all forms (i.e. political, educational, media, legal, etc.) and teachings. As I pondered this concept it also occured to me, having come from a C-of-E background, mixed with a spout of Jehovah's Witnesses and even discussions with Mormons it occured to me that each of them (plus others I'd not tangled with but had heard/knew of) had all said the same thing: "Man is in charge". Now I don't consider myself a superior being in any manner, but on the otherhand there HAS to be a reason for this. Comparing the consequences of society's that live by the "man in charge" system seems to have done well while feminism, or more aptly named "female dominance", seems to being going down the pan somewhat rapidly. Very rapidly. Thousands of years under "Man in charge" systems vs a few decades of "female dominance" and you only have to look at the TV or read the papers to see the destruction & incompitance we live under on a daily basis.


BTW, AH, My best wishes to your wife. I genuinely hope her situation has been dealt swiftly with. I'm in a similar position as my mother has similar in her lung & liver, despite having recovered once from it already. My fingers are crossed for all.

According to the bible it was a command to man to dominate.
I believe that if men are weak and allow women to rule then we all pay..
Men must understand this balance. We try to be nice and give into women's desires and it bites us in the ass.


Notice this verse from the KJV was talking about the past but a warning to the present.
Isaiah 3:12
- As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.

They which lead thee cause thee to err, women who were/are ruling and they have helped the children to become oppressors. Are children oppressors today? Rotten, rebellous, disrespectful..

God was warning mankind. I know you don't believe this although I do.

verse 16:
Moreover the LORD saith, Because the daughters of Zion are haughty, and walk with stretched forth necks and wanton eyes, walking and mincing as they go, and making a tinkling with their feet:

(Spoiled rotten, proud and wanting everything.
Because of all these things the entire population will pay dearly for this..)

-Going back up a bit.

4: And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them.
(Women promote inexperienced or inmature men to act as ruler. Those who suck up to women and allow women to lead.) manginas

5: And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour: the child shall behave himself proudly against the ancient, and the base against the honourable.
(The older wiser men will have no respect from the young rulers)

9:The shew of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul! for they have rewarded evil unto themselves.

Notice when women rule there is a hint that homosexuality becomes common.




`

You dudes are scaring me. I think you're right. But it seems to me that restoring the balance is going to necessarily involve violence. And what is that going to mean to those of us women who are anti-feminist? We look just like the enemy.

Feminists have relied on violence to get their points across. In a thread not so long ago, I asked for a pointer to an occasion that made the news in England whereby feminists used a bomb at a TV station. This was going back to the very early 80s.
Men (at a general level) are not innately violent. I genuinely doubt it will be a violent resolve. I certainly hope it isn't.

I think you're correct, although The violence would be a rebellion against government or political leaders. I really believe the governments have forced feminism on the world. They have goals which they have achieved thru feminism.

I really just don't see a massive rebellion coming anytime soon.
There are too many guys who have no clue and they act as manginas until they experience the worst on their own.

The world has become a sad place.

The men who become violent are more likely to lash out on their own.
This is and has happened.

1 guy who shot the judge supposedly.
2 guys who made a final stand in court.

It don't help our cause since they just strike them off as being insane.

I hope you're right. I'm not as optimistic. Haven't you ever been so mad you've seen red? Or heard of a mob tearing up a city?

I just keep thinking of the French Revolution, ya know? We ARE talking revolution of a kind here.

While feminist make me see red and bring a side of me I don't reveal oft.
I think most women even though they have a dose of the feminist virus and cluelss about it or not really the enemy. They may act like the enemy but they are just ignorant. Women are easily infuleneced.

I grew up with a real love for women only to be shot down by those in my family and others which made me change. over time I have watched women grow colder and more selfish.

Men didn't want no war with women and still don't.
It's not our natue to fight with or compete with women. (women don't understand this)
But to protect and nurture them. I believe men are too nice to most women.

While many young men are turning against women(I don't blame them)
I don't think they would ever resort to violence against them in any large sense. But watch out for those depressed loners. Those are the ones used to generalize us all.

Thank you, guys. That does make me feel a little more secure. Just watch your backs. Because when it happens, you may be surprised. Women won't hesitate to turn on you. Maybe even some you didn't expect it from.