So let's see, about 1 million kids in Australia would mean that 150,000 to 200,000 kids are living with the wrong parent or doesn't even know their real Father.

Isn't that some form of child abuse. Have women found another way of abusing children, legally?

Absolutely..

Cheating mums' DNA test

By Clair Weaver

September 09, 2007 12:00am

SUSPICIOUS fathers are fueling a surge in the number of DNA paternity tests secretly being performed on children in Australia.

Thousands of men who suspect their partners of infidelity are ordering checks on their sons and daughters to establish whether they are biologically related.

They send swabs taken from their child's mouth, old toothbrushes, used cotton buds, fingernails and hair samples to laboratories for testing.

Between 15 and 20 per cent come back with a negative result, meaning those involved find out they are not related, according to laboratories.

The trend for secret testing through online companies without consent has sparked ethical concerns for the emotional wellbeing of children and fathers who discover they are not related.

DNA Bio Services managing director Gary Miller told The Sunday Telegraph suspicion was the main factor driving people to arrange tests.

"About 80 per cent would be fathers who want to check their child is actually theirs.

"Ten years ago, there were about 200 DNA tests a year done in Australia, but now we would see 5000.

"The growth has been phenomenal.''

Professor Patrick Parkinson, a family law expert at Sydney University, has raised concerns about the ethics of DNA tests without parental consent.

Whenever I see this I get really suspicious about the possibility of this (expert)not being a neutral observer and possibly just another feminist lackey..

Probably why we have the comment about Fathers not seeking the "parent" permission, meaning the women ofcourse...

Let's see what the Professor has been doing lately ?

Parkinson P, ‘Review: Scott-Hunt, S and Lim, L (eds), "Feminist Perspectives on Equity and Trusts"’ (2003) 22 Feminist Legal Studies 93-97.

You can be guaranteed that whenever a female journalist does any article where there is some male-angle, she will get some response from some feminised drip-fed mangina or some male-hating neurotic feminist so-called Professor...

So I do not know whether he just reveiwed it or it's part of his POV..?

Without fail though, feminised female journalists just cannot give an inch can they...

Keep up the male-hate.

More...

Only I million Cj?

How old is a kid? 3? 10? Let's see. Pop 20 million. Under 15 y/o, about thirty percent (a guess). That's 6 million. 15% - 20% gives 900,000 to 1.2 million.