This is sickening the ongoing situation that Fathers face in every country in the world today. Violent women are encouraged to do whatever they want with any consequence..

Read and be sickened like I was by the blatant sexism courts encourage..

Like many in Canada-A story from Washington State:


"Jennifer Jean Worley, Auburn, Washington 98001, white female, 5'5" 180 pounds, green eyes brown hair DOB June 17, 1971 Voted on November 2, 2004 has not voted since.

she was initially charged with Assault 2, a felony, assault with a deadly weapon, specifically a knife, and she copped a plea to the reduced charge of Assault 4, domestic violence, a misdemeanor. 12 month suspended sentence. 3 days of imprisonment already served. She keeps her right to vote, but as this case is post Brady Bill and after Washington's incredibly multi-subject Violence Reduction Act of 1994, her right to keep and bear arms is gone.

The Certificate of Probable Cause filed with the Information alleges: She was living with the father of her child and the child, a nice evening at home. Started screaming at the father, accusing him of neglecting their child. The father suggested that she was setting a poor example for the child by yelling at him. This prompted the more appropriate behavior of physically assaulting the father while he sat on the couch, hitting and scratching him.

The father, faced with a choice between risking the county jail or the county morgue, chose to risk the morgue. Rather than counter-attack in self defense, he retreated through the kitchen and dining room, whereupon dear sweet Jennifer Jean made use of the kitchen utensils. She threw several knives at the father screaming: "I'm gonna kill ya!" One knife punctured the father's left forearm. Jenny Jean picked up a kitchen pot and swung it
at her man, then threw it at him hitting his left elbow, bruising it. The father continued his retreat and Jenny followed him ripping his shirt. This father tried to calm Jenny Jean by handing her their now screaming child.

As this did not work, he handed the child off to his brother, the kid's uncle.

Upon contact with the police, Jenny Jean admitted throwing the knives but denied stabbing her man with them. She admitted the scratching and the throwing of the pot at him. Deputy Prosecutor summed up by declaring that Jenny Jean poses a threat to the community as evidenced by her lack of control in the presence of her child and her use of multiple weapons.

While still under probation for her Assault 4 conviction, Jenny Jean had the AUDACITY to petition for a restraining order against this same man she was CONVICTED of ASSAULTING!! In her petition in No.
<http://dw.courts. wa.gov/index. cfm?fa=home. casesummary& casenumber= 97-2-09519
she alleged that he was arrested for domestic violence by the Kent Police Department. We can see how this happens: she throws a temper tantrum and he gets arrested for it! The other really TERRIBLE thing he did was that he kept visiting his child at the daycare center! Imagine that!! A father looking after his child at the daycare center! Next thing you know he will be taking the kid fishing and to ball games and be wanting to talk to his school teachers. He might get in their faces if they try to make the kid take Ritalin! We can't have that! The temporary order imposed a 300 foot exclusion radius, including his child's day care center. The matter came to hearing before Commissioner <http://pro.wsba. org/PublicView- Member.asp? Usr_ID=752350> Harry Richard
Slusher, both parties present and examined by Commissioner <http://pro.wsba. org/PublicView- Member.asp? Usr_ID=752350> Slusher.

It is impossible for me to believe that the man completely forgot about the violent incident and the resulting conviction of this woman for assaulting him. Nevertheless, Commissioner <http://pro.wsba. org/PublicView- Member.asp? Usr_ID=752350> Slusher imposed a one year restraining order, increasing the exclusion radius to 500 feet, with no visitation with his child!! The only redeeming quality of this order is that there is a notation that it is subject to change in a pending divorce or paternity action. While most paternity actions are brought with intent to nail the guy for child support, sometimes the father winds up with custody or at least visitation or shared parenting rights. Unfortunately such results are too few and too far between. "

Many thanks to:

Roger Knight FRA

Washington State

"Domestic violence 'research' has been misleading, in that data has been
extracted from crime reports and/or 'crime victim surveys - in which men
underreport more than women - and have been publicized as indicating
domestic violence is a gender issue (male-perpetrator/ female-victims) . In
fact, when larger surveys with representative samples are examined,
perpetration of domestic violence perpetration is slightly more common for
females..."

Dr Don Dutton

Professor of Psychology

University of British Columbia

Something went wrong with this text, please correct it.

And NO, not everywhere in this world fathers are restricted or husbands have to accept all and everything, what the violent wife is calling on him.

This is only where feminism is rampant - for sure it is not where I am living now since decades, for sure it's not the case in most other Asian countries I know - Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand, Cambodia, Laos etc. etc...

there is a saying

"whom the gods want to destroy they firsr drive mad"

any guy who expects anything but chop logic from the feminit legal system is investing in mental conflict which over a period can undermine his sanity

feminitismis dereistic thinking is like that of children they think wishing for good things will materialise them for enjoyment

such thinking suite the feminits

what ever they do they complain about and thier victime is the culprit

feminit thinking and lawis designed to demoralise and compromise objective thinking used by men

it is as if to say I hold up a store and get my come upins from the proprietor

the proprietor is then incarcerated for assulting me and I get compensated


it is Kafkaesque insanity on the hoof and meant to me so by the feminits and their handmaidens the manginas

At his trail for murder during the Boer War, Lt. 'Breaker' Morant was asked which Rule of Engagement he had used when he had shot the prisoners he had taken.

"Rule 303, Sir".

One that would apply well with this Shuster fellow.

I was assaulted by my exe six times before and during the divorce. I tried dozens of times to get a restraining order and failed. This was as more assaults were occuring before and after surgery to repair prior assault injuries. My doctor had me wear a velcroed on half cast to protect my just-operated on elbow. This was held against me as it would create the impression for the child that his Mom was violent. Which she was and admitted to being. Then I got kicked out of my house and things got much worse for my son.

To me it seems wrong that I was attacked again and again while asking for help and then kicked out of my own house. With no sanctions of any kind for the violent person. And then the child experience violence from the same violent person. And the child could not get help with this person, his Mom.